[Ganglia-general] Gmetric Repository offline?

2005-11-03 Thread Kenneth Young
Hi all, Opening browser to http://ganglia.info/gmetric/ returns the following error. Is the page temporarily offline? *Warning*: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to MySQL server on 'mysql' (113) in */home/groups/g/ga/ganglia/htdocs/gmetric/header.php* on line *6* Could not connect to database

Re: [Ganglia-general] Gmetric Repository offline?

2005-11-03 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Ken, I am afraid that we are victim of the MySQL changes at SF - which we apparently ignored :-( Matt, could you contact them and ask about moving our stuff? Cheers Martin --- Kenneth Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Opening browser to http://ganglia.info/gmetric/ returns the

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi, hmm. interesting. Was the Bytes-Out the only metric showing problems at that time? What about Packets-Out. Loss of metric data is not unheard of, but only one metric affected is strange. What platform and version (gmond, gmetad web-frontend) are you running? Cheers Martin --- G.

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread michael chang
On 11/2/05, G. Francisco Perin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having a strange issue with ganglia reporting (not reporting) network traffic on a high volume web site. The graphs are reporting Any ideas what might be causing the chart to do this? Do you think I am looking at a real problem or

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread Ian Cunningham
Two more possibilities. 1. ganglia is using a variable that does not have enough bits and there is overflow. 2. ganglia is looking an a different network interface or it is not aggregating the data for all interfaces. Ian michael chang wrote: On 11/2/05, G. Francisco Perin [EMAIL

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread G. Francisco Perin
Yes - good questions. Packets out was un-affected. The only chart that shows a dip is Bytes/second out so sorry (Tx). But the Sar data is conclusive - it shows about the same throughput as Ganglia reports but does not show any big drops. I was thinking maybe ganglia is getting one bad data