Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi, hmm. interesting. Was the Bytes-Out the only metric showing problems at that time? What about Packets-Out. Loss of metric data is not unheard of, but only one metric affected is strange. What platform and version (gmond, gmetad web-frontend) are you running? Cheers Martin --- G.

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread michael chang
On 11/2/05, G. Francisco Perin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having a strange issue with ganglia reporting (not reporting) network traffic on a high volume web site. The graphs are reporting Any ideas what might be causing the chart to do this? Do you think I am looking at a real problem or

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread Ian Cunningham
Two more possibilities. 1. ganglia is using a variable that does not have enough bits and there is overflow. 2. ganglia is looking an a different network interface or it is not aggregating the data for all interfaces. Ian michael chang wrote: On 11/2/05, G. Francisco Perin [EMAIL

Re: [Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-03 Thread G. Francisco Perin
Yes - good questions. Packets out was un-affected. The only chart that shows a dip is Bytes/second out so sorry (Tx). But the Sar data is conclusive - it shows about the same throughput as Ganglia reports but does not show any big drops. I was thinking maybe ganglia is getting one bad data

[Ganglia-general] TCP/IP Bad Data

2005-11-02 Thread G. Francisco Perin
I am having a strange issue with ganglia reporting (not reporting) network traffic on a high volume web site. The graphs are reporting points of zero (0) data when SAR data is not showing the same information. Its disconcerting because if Ganglia is reporting good information then I have a