On 4 September 2014 06:34, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Changed the coding style.
2014-09-03 Guozhi Wei car...@google.com
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Thank you. OK /Marcus
On 20 August 2014 20:51, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Good suggestion. Add the testcase.
thanks
Guozhi Wei
2014-08-20 Guozhi Wei car...@google.com
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Index: pr62040.c
On 20 August 2014 00:43, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Hi
Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
vector mode only.
As suggested by Andrew
Changed the coding style.
2014-09-03 Guozhi Wei car...@google.com
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Index: pr62040.c
===
--- pr62040.c (revision 0)
+++ pr62040.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0
AArch64 maintainers, could you help to review following patches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01966.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02060.html
thanks
Guozhi Wei
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
Good suggestion. Add the
Hi Carrot,
cc'ing the aarch64 maintainers...
On 20/08/14 00:43, Carrot Wei wrote:
Hi
Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
vector mode only.
As
Good suggestion. Add the testcase.
thanks
Guozhi Wei
2014-08-20 Guozhi Wei car...@google.com
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Index: pr62040.c
===
--- pr62040.c (revision 0)
+++ pr62040.c
Hi
Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
vector mode only.
As suggested by Andrew in the bug entry, I split the original insn
patterns to avoid