[Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

Hello! I could have missed it but i do not see any ability to view/edit JPEG/PNG image comments. Which is good to have in Geeqie, i think. At least viewing. Geeqie already uses libexiv2, so adding this feature should be mostly UI job. For example, it can be implemented as an enhancement of the

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:34 -0800, Jack Craig wrote: Hi Alexander, I find that opening the info pane shows a comments box. add/update works if you click the lower right metadata icon. it works for me, how about you? hth, jackc... Yes, I saw this pane. But the comments entered in it

Re: [Geeqie-devel] JPEG image comments

Hi Klaus, On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:16 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: Hi Alexander, I do not see the point. You still can have all kind of exiv stuff, also comments, in the side pannel. Just drag and drop it from the exif pannel or enter it by hand. What is wrong with this way? Gruß Klaus

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Consider adding an Up button

On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Klaus Ethgen klaus+gee...@ethgen.de wrote: Am So den 15. Sep 2013 um 0:31 schrieb Jeffery Small: [Sensless add] Who is adding these obnoxious ads? Is Sourceforge responsible, or someone else? I think, that is the new policy of sourceforge; to make money out

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > While I also much prefer Geeqie to stay just a viewer, plus maybe a kind > of "shell" for editors [1], I disagree that Linux lacks lightweight > viewers. feh is currently my other favorite. > > [1] > On this topic, would

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Josef Kufner wrote: > ... > I think there is a better way, but it would be a bit more complicated > to implement. I wonder if it is a bit too complex for a simple > use-cases. It is called "block programming". It is quite an old idea: > ... >

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Alexander Antimonov <alexander.antimonov.od...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Omari Stephens <x...@xsdg.org> wrote: >> On 12/26/2016 10:37 PM, Alexander Antimonov wrote: >>> Is there any plan, enha

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

Hi, I could take part in porting Geeqie to C++1x if it is decided to do so. I've been using different kinds of C++ (98/2003/201x) for more than 10 years. I believe the fundamental thing why C++ is better than C is C++ destructor and all the automatic actions that can be taken in it. It is very

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Omari Stephens <x...@xsdg.org> wrote: > On 12/26/2016 10:37 PM, Alexander Antimonov wrote: >> Is there any plan, enhancement list, users' whishlist? > > There is a bug list, which does have some feature requests as well: > https://github.co

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > I for myself have technical reasons why I dislike C++. And I also have Could you, please, provide a list of your dislikes of C++? > concerns about maintainability. Many times the encapsulating breaks > necessary

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams

> We should have a good expectation of improving life for our users ... Users are important, but with such move we could improve developers' life at least. > - Introduce new bugs (because big rewrites always do) Sure, but with C++ port we can also simplify code, and less code - less bugs. Now