I think we have two cases here that we need to treat differently:
public and private code. In the case of publicly developed code, we
can easily check the public source repository and mailing lists and
say hey, these people did contribute to the project. I the case of
privately developed
+1 to the general idea.
Yoav
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 09:51:40PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating
robert burrell donkin asked:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony.
The list of committers on the proposal are the people we
expect to show up, but we won't be creating accounts by
default - we'll need to have each person say yes, I'm ready
