Leo Simons wrote:
As long as we agree that nothing should get into the way of
site functionality (and we do), why would you oppose a site that
also is easy to navigate and looks good?
The only thing I oppose is the idea something being set in stone or
approved by some mythical
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 17:12, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a small screenshot of the maven page with a white
header.
Aaah WINXPCRAP! :)
+1
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: subproject layout conventions
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a small screenshot of the maven page
Leo Simons wrote:
I very much agree. I was under the impression though that at this point,
there are some designers available somewhere. It would be good if they
would explain which things would be good to change so we can put that
into the system.
There is no paid staff, and AFAIK, no
On 3/29/02 8:26 AM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: subproject layout conventions
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
There is no paid staff, and AFAIK, no designers who are also
committers.
The maven layout looks like it has been designed by a designer.
except that the website is not only for geeks. It's also for people
that make decisions and have money.
Says who?
Me. I wan't to use jakarta stuff
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On 3/29/02 8:26 AM, Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a small
Leo Simons wrote:
As long as we agree that nothing should get into the way of site functionality (and
we do), why would you oppose a site that also is easy to navigate and looks good?
The only thing I oppose is the idea something being set in stone or
approved by some mythical designer.
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 01:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/03/2002 08:15:53 AM:
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:13, Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I propose we
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 09:05, Berin Loritsch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:13, Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 09:05, Berin Loritsch wrote:
I would definitely like to see a Maven like system across
the projects
in Jakarta--even if the main site is not altered much. It would be
good to give the
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 09:53, Berin Loritsch wrote:
The only thing I would want to customize are:
1) Project Logo
2) Project color-scheme
No problem :-)
That's it. I really don't think that is too much to ask. The
layout should remain constant without a doubt.
We are in agreement
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Everything should definitely feel the same. However, color is
a definite clue that you have changed contexts. By drilling
down a Project's heirarchy, it helps to have a visual clue that
you are not at the same level you used to be.
Color
-Original Message-
From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
another lenghty post, so I'll start with a summary:
- color variations (and all other lf changes) should be
part of the original look-and-feel design. Giving
programmers free reign to do this spells disaster.
- color variations (and all other lf changes) should be
part of the original look-and-feel design. Giving
programmers free reign to do this spells disaster.
It would be best to have the original designer of a
look and feel work this out. Very strictly.
:(
Seriously, I
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/03/2002 12:53:36 AM:
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 09:53, Berin Loritsch wrote:
The only thing I would want to customize are:
1) Project Logo
2) Project color-scheme
No problem :-)
The only other thing I've found handy is if there's no
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a small screenshot of the maven page with a white
header.
Aaah WINXPCRAP! :)
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, I'm a programmer myself ;)
as a reassurance:
the changes this discussion talks about will happen in jakarta-site2,
and will consist of backwards-compatible changes to site.xsl and
site.vsl. Projects that depend on jakarta-site2 will change to the
new look and feel automatically. For
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:13, Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I propose we draft a set of guidelines (_not_
rules) on a general structure.
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/maven/
There's a sample
Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I propose we draft a set of guidelines (_not_
rules) on a general structure.
Lets start with some discussion :)
All this and more is being tackled (slowly but steadily)
on 3/27/02 2:26 PM, Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All this and more is being tackled (slowly but steadily) in Forrest -
and having some Jakarta people involved for cross-pollination would be
good.
There's not much yet except for the foundation and build environment and
some static
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:23:35PM -0800, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 3/27/02 2:26 PM, Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All this and more is being tackled (slowly but steadily) in Forrest -
and having some Jakarta people involved for cross-pollination would be
good.
There's not
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/03/2002 08:15:53 AM:
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 17:13, Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I propose we draft a set of guidelines (_not_
rules) on a general
From: Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leo Simons wrote:
It has been brought up by many people that there
is no common way of organising subproject websites.
I propose we draft a set of guidelines (_not_
rules) on a general structure.
Lets start with some discussion :)
All this and
24 matches
Mail list logo
