The reporter for Calcite is at this link:
https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite
Not sure if it works for SDAP, but you should be able to see a list of
all your projects here: https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/
Francis
On 21/03/2024 10:36 am, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I’m not
Hello Yonglun,
My name is Francis Chuang. I am on the PMC of Apache Calcite and have
been involved with the project for many years.
I mostly write code in Go and am very interested in APM and
OpenTelemetry. I have been following this thread and the discussion of
your proposal and it looks
Hey Apratim,
Those files are stored in a subversion repository, therefore, you will
need to install subversion (svn) to checkout and commit to the repository.
I can see that you are already a committer on incubator, so your ASF
account should have sufficient permissions to edit the file.
+1 (binding)
Francis
On 29/03/2024 5:24 pm, Zhang Yonglun wrote:
Hi Incubator,
Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for HertzBeat[1],
I am starting this official vote for the HertzBeat project.
Here is their proposal:
Thanks, Chao Gong, for addressing those issues in
https://github.com/dromara/hertzbeat/commit/1284914c4a2d42c8355417c164810787fb64e588
Looking at the updated website, the issues raised have been taken care of.
Regarding keeping the website's source code and project code in the
project
My vote is +1 (binding)
- Checked SHA512 signatures - OK
- Extracted contents of binary and source archives - OK
- Checked GPG signatures - OK
- Checked README - OK
- Checked NOTICE - OK
- Checked LICENSE - OK
- Went through release notes - OK
- Ran tests and built: mvn clean install - OK
It's a Category A license, so it should be compatible with the Apache
License 2.0 [1]. It's listed as Creative Commons Copyright-Only
Dedication and links to the CC0 1.0 Public Domain page.
[1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
On 23/04/2024 7:22 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
I think this is a well thought-out and change. It reduces the load on
Infra and allows the project's contributors to take ownership of
removing the (incubating) disclaimers and annotations after graduation.
On 23/04/2024 11:22 am, tison wrote:
Hi,
Recently, the new added podlings, namely
+1 (binding)
I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach.
Francis
On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote:
Hi,
Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following
proposals:
1. Establish a consensus to allow and finally converge podling's GitHub repo to
have a