On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Francesco R wrote:
The ready to cut ebuild at the bottom print it's environment (variable
and functions) to a bunch of files into /var/tmp/fakebuild/.
May be useful for who want to have a look at what and when is
avaible during the various emerge
Ladies Gentlemen,
Some of you may know me from lurking on #gentoo-dev or moderating
#gentoo or any of another handful of channels that I'm in. Anyway, I'm
trying to become a developer and to learn the Gentoo way. I have been
assigned an old bug to try and resolve, Bug #5113, New
Dave Nebinger posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:46:13 -0400:
Wouldn't it be better to use the
associated portage-provided packages?
That's the goal - strip out the parts from their distribution that have
exiting components already within the portage tree
On 03/10/05, Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer if the patch was left out for amd64 users, or included via a
use flag. reiser4 isn't yet stable or proven on amd64.
A quick search found this quote: The topic in channel #gentoo-amd64
on irc.freenode.net has said Reiser4 is evil for
Tres Melton posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:49:29 -0600:
However, this is going to take a couple of weeks to write entirely in
bash so that it is both portable and can be used on the most minimal of
systems.
Imagine seeing /you/ here! =8^)
Portability is
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Francesco R wrote:
The ready to cut ebuild at the bottom print it's environment (variable
and functions) to a bunch of files into /var/tmp/fakebuild/.
May be useful for who want to have a look at what and when is
avaible during
On Monday 03 October 2005 11:14, Duncan wrote:
Portability is good, but as I've been reading Diego Flameeyes various
posts as he struggles to get Gentoo/FBSD up and running, and with
Gentoo/Darwin and etc. in mind, I'm sure one of the requests is going to
be making it full borne shell standard
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:04 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 03 October 2005 11:14, Duncan wrote:
Hello Duncan.
Actually, bash is fine, as long as you declare #!/bin/bash the script. Every
Gentoo/ALT system should have bash installed as part of base system, as bash
is what
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 10:10 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 03/10/05, Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer if the patch was left out for amd64 users, or included via a
use flag. reiser4 isn't yet stable or proven on amd64.
A quick search found this quote: The topic in channel
On Monday 03 October 2005 13:39, Tres Melton wrote:
I've coded the parts that
extract and parse the information from the /etc/{passwd,group} files
I think with this you're already out of portability. /etc/passwd structure in
Linux and FreeBSD is different, and on Darwin the users part is
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:02 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be
included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel
in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
supposed to be completely autonomous,
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 17:43 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to remind you guys that this is about the last chance you
have to send me your GPG keys to be added to the list. For instructions
please see http://dev.gentoo.org/~cryos/keysigning_lwe_05.html and email
me your key.
Look forward to seeing you guys down at the expo in
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:57 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:10 pm, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
|
|I was wondering if there's any chance of having the reiser4 patch for
|grub (or even the whole
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 10:10 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 03/10/05, Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer if the patch was left out for amd64 users, or included via a
use flag. reiser4 isn't yet stable or proven on amd64.
A quick search found this quote: The topic in channel
Chris Gianelloni posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 03 Oct 2005 08:54:21 -0400:
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 10:02 +, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
whatever stirs your
maillog: 03/10/2005-08:56:57(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
| use-flag based RESTRICT...
No, because then that would encourage even more people
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
| use-flag based RESTRICT...
No, because then that would
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:39 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
| use-flag based
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
C) 15 hour upgrade/build, hanging an hour into it is going to be an
ass biter.
This is actually why I've been doing something I would normally *not* do
and have been breaking up some games ebuilds that require a CD into a
$foo and
Brian Harring wrote:
Ebuilds are non-interactive compile/install... that's the design, and
intention of them.
Sure, I thought that RESTRICT=interactive would just tell the user that
she would have to provide some feedback in cases like those that
wolf31o2 mentioned (games from CD).
I don't
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 03:05 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola.
Subject says it all; SANDBOX_DISABLED functions as (essentially)
RESTRICT=sandbox, except sandbox is left on for pkg_setup .
This is pretty much redundant, considering it's usage. People stick
it in the global scope; if you
I've attached the whole file because the patch was pretty much nonsensical.
* Cleaned up initialization
* Check that the ebuild specified is the ebuild that portage will use and
adjust paths if it isn't.
* Alter clean behavior when FEATURES=noauto to bring it into line with
Brian's changes to
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:06:35AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Don't like the size of this patch, but it's quite repetitive so...
Wouldn't worry on the repetitive, it's repetitive due to the fact the
*dbapi classes don't (ab|)use inheritance...
* Make all aux_get() functions return a list of
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 03:30, Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:06:35AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Don't like the size of this patch, but it's quite repetitive so...
Wouldn't worry on the repetitive, it's repetitive due to the fact the
*dbapi classes don't (ab|)use
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:27:09AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 03:30, Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:06:35AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Don't like the size of this patch, but it's quite repetitive so...
Wouldn't worry on the repetitive, it's
31 matches
Mail list logo
