Nick Devito wrote:
It wouldn't be a hard task to accomplish (to put the sources on the
mirrors), since *most* of the source is already on the mirrors in some
form or another. We could make an option when downloading the livecd to
either download ones with the sources included, or without, and,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an opt-out system
rather
than opt-in ? instead of adding things like:
dmi
icc
mmx
svga
...
to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask and
then un-mask them in default-linux/x86 ?
Curtis Napier wrote:
Two names I see missing from this (otherwise very good) list are Chris
Gianelloni (wolf31o2) and Donnie Berkholz (spyderous aka dberkholz). I
think everyone knows exactly how much work these two put into Gentoo and
how valuable that contribution is. Their knowledge would
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an opt-out system rather
than opt-in ? instead of adding things like:
to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask and
then un-mask them in default-linux/x86 ? doesnt that make more sense ?
Zac Medico schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
When FEATURES=mirror, and you try to fetch, it does indeed contain unevaluated
USE flags. However for FEATURES=-mirror, the content of it is correct - no USE
flags at all.
Are you sure about the SRC_URI
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 04:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an opt-out system
rather than opt-in ? instead of adding things like:
to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask
and then un-mask
* Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
However, with baselayout-1.12 we intercept calls to start-stop-daemon
and store information about what was started (binary, pidfile) so
when root then does /etc/init.d/foo status we check to see if all
the binaries are still running. If not
* Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Yes, would be better, if it's included in the gpm release.
But: it should be possible to build/install it independently from
gpm, and also to build gpm against an already installed libgpm.
So actually two separate packages, maybe
I've just forwarded my last mail to the gpm list, since it better
should be discussed there. So please anwser to there too and
let's table this topic here, until we've got something new from
the upstream
cu
--
-
Enrico
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:09 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
I'm open to arguments in favor of such a project, tho, if people have
real plans. Certainly, an easier way to generate and maintain root
filesystems for UML would be nice.
As far as VMware is concerned, I see no point in this herd.
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 03:08 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
It would be nice to have this in 2006.1 (I suspect catalyst/genkernel
could probably benefit greatly from it).
We've already made the snapshot. Also, catalyst uses genkernel for all
of the external modules builds, and we've already got
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 07:59 -0600, Nick Devito wrote:
Yeah, to me, having those in the emulation category just
doesn'tfit there, but, that's just me. Maybe we could take xen,
vmware, qemu, and related packages out of app-emulation, and make a new
category, app-virtualization. That would
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:59 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:12 +, Duncan wrote:
For example, if we hand out CDs at conventions etc, we would have to
also hand out source CDs.
As my reply there, however, Gentoo does still have it better
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the binary one? Just
make a cd with all the distfiles used in the ISO, and keep the source
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 15:43 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
No it's not a trivial amount, but it's also important that we comply
with the licenses of the software that we distribute. I think that
storing a gig or two extra on the mirrors (or more on the mirrors that
archive /historical) is fairly
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the binary one? Just
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 14:15 -0600, Nick Devito wrote:
It wouldn't be a hard task to accomplish (to put the sources on the
mirrors), since *most* of the source is already on the mirrors in some
form or another. We could make an option when downloading the livecd to
either download ones with the
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 22:31 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Incidentally, the sources don't have to be on all the mirrors,
assuming that's a problem at all. We could supply just one source server
and rate-limit it; after all over the long term very few people will
actually need to retrieve source
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 21:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an opt-out system
rather
than opt-in ? instead of adding things like:
dmi
icc
mmx
svga
...
to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask and
then
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 09:00 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but couldn't it be made
to create a source CD ISO when it is generating the binary one? Just
make a
On Saturday, 1 July 2006 02:46, Mike Frysinger wrote:
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating
people for the next Gentoo Council
Hi all,
I would like to nominate:
Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
Mike Frysinger (vapier)
Michael Sterrett
* Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
We can simply burn them all to a DVD and put an offer on the CD on how
to get the sources, then distribute it for the cost of the DVD/shipping.
Another idea would be to put the CD/DVD/whatever on the store, with 0
mark-up. That would mean we
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i guess i'll start off some mass nominations of random people off the top of
my head who i think would do a good job ... there's a bunch more people i
think would do a good job, but i'm going to cut my list short as it's already
ridiculously long ...
Thanks for the
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 15:59 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
It would be enough, regularily burning not yet archived tarballs
on an CD and collecting them in some box where they can be catched
if someone requests it. This should be done by several people, so
in case of disk errors, fire, dead,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:38:42AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:00:29AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:34 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Patrick McLean schrieb:
I have absolutely zero experience with catalyst, but
Hi folks,
I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too.
As the documentation states ~x86 means, it's working, but not
properly tested on this platform (ie. x86).
How does the process of proving packages work ?
I've made good experiences with bugzilla-2.22 - the whole
Please move this thread to the appropriate mailing list..
(ie not this list)
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 14:31 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Yes, would be better, if it's included in the gpm release.
But: it should be possible to
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
How does the process of proving packages work ?
Please file a stabilization bug on b.g.o with ebuild version and `emerge
--info`.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache...
signature.asc
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Anyway, I really am starting to like the DVD available via the store
idea more and more, as it only means Release Engineering needs to do a
little extra work, and it requires no extra work for our mirrors or
Infrastructure team.
The source DVD sounds like a great
Brian Harring wrote:
don't see why we need to have a public system setup as long as we can
provide the source when asked. As far as a I know, the GPL doesn't
dicate that we have to provide the sources in an internet media form.
They just need to be available when requested. Perhaps we can
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:09 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
I'm open to arguments in favor of such a project, tho, if people have
real plans. Certainly, an easier way to generate and maintain root
filesystems for UML would be nice.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to nominate:
vapier/SpanKY
flameeyes
Kugelfang
uberlord
wolf31o2
seemant
solar
Mr_Bones_
KingTaco
I would add dsd and spyderous if they hadn't both already turned down
nominations.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too. As the
documentation states ~x86 means, it's working, but not properly
tested on this platform (ie. x86).
How does the process of proving packages work
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
don't see why we need to have a public system setup as long as we can
provide the source when asked. As far as a I know, the GPL doesn't
dicate that we have to provide the sources in an internet media
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
x86 AT O_o *bonks nightmorph on the head* you're a developer! that's
almost, well entirely, a step in the opposite direction. We could use
the help on the x86 team as well. And we're not overbearing, only
needing you to test 4 packages in a month with
Brian Harring wrote:
That said, y'all _should_ have a fairly vanilla base configuration
across all servers (base kernel config, firewalling, grsec config,
etc). Further, y'all were running lighttpd last I knew- so y'all
should be tracking it for securities concerns already... and this
On Wed, Jul 5, 2006 at 18:20:08 +0200, Patrick McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to nominate:
vapier/SpanKY
flameeyes
Kugelfang
uberlord
wolf31o2
seemant
solar
Mr_Bones_
KingTaco
Please correct me if I am wrong, but there is no point in
Mike Frysinger wrote:
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating people
for the next Gentoo Council
for the quick low down:
- nominations are from July 1 through July 31
- anyone can nominate
- only Gentoo devs may be nominated
so get with the nominating
* Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of
directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It
makes it easier for the arch team to not have to filter through bugs
and track down maintainers ourselves.
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 09:00 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, I really am starting to like the DVD available via the store
idea more and more, as it only means Release Engineering needs to do a
little extra work, and it requires no extra work for our
Curtis Napier wrote:
If it's decided to go with this idea I think we should mark it up a little,
even if it's only a dollar or two. People actually don't mind paying a
little if it's going to go towards helping Gentoo. We get tons of
threads asking about donating in the forums so this would be
On Wed, Jul 5, 2006 at 19:15:50 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of
directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It
makes it easier for the arch team to not
Jakub Moc wrote:
[snip]
3. b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution , a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
If it's decided to go with this idea I think we should mark it up
a little, even if it's only a dollar or two. People actually
don't mind paying a little if it's going to go towards helping
Gentoo. We get
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 05 Jul 2006
14:18:45 +0200:
* Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
However, with baselayout-1.12 we intercept calls to start-stop-daemon
and store information about what was started (binary, pidfile)
Patrick McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:47:37 -0400:
The source DVD sounds like a great idea to me, no need to keep anything
around on mirrors, and we fulfill all the requirements of the GPL.
+1
--
Duncan - List replies preferred.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Zac Medico schrieb:
If a version of SRC_URI that has all the conditionals evaluated is
needed in the ebuild environment, then I think we should use a new
variable name. Otherwise, it's ambiguous.
Doesn't $AA already satisfy
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted 060705
When will it the new baselayout (1.12.0) be ready ?
I've been using it since 060604 without any problems.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 13:04 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 09:00 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, I really am starting to like the DVD available via the store
idea more and more, as it only means Release Engineering needs to do
Zac Medico schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
Zac Medico schrieb:
If a version of SRC_URI that has all the conditionals evaluated is
needed in the ebuild environment, then I think we should use a new
variable name. Otherwise, it's ambiguous.
Doesn't
Hi,
I am trying to create an ebuild for the icecream monitor available at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/icecream/icemon-kde3.tar.bz2
Running 'configure' goes fine, but running 'make' just keeps running
configure over and over. If there's any autotools gurus who can have a
quick look, it'd
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:05, Marcus Furlong wrote:
Running 'configure' goes fine, but running 'make' just keeps running
configure over and over.
It's commonly caused when the timestamp of configure and the sources for
configure are messed up. Make sure no file has modification time in the
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 08:51 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
Every few months is a rough rate going by memory at 8:30am. Not huge,
but as said, if need to provide access to gpl'd sources for bin (not
just releng cds btw, people are forgetting we have precompiled pkgs in
the tree also), it _is_
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:05, Marcus Furlong wrote:
Running 'configure' goes fine, but running 'make' just keeps running
configure over and over.
It's commonly caused when the timestamp of configure and the sources for
configure are messed up. Make sure no
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed,
05 Jul 2006 16:28:10 -0400:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 08:51 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
Every few months is a rough rate going by memory at 8:30am. Not huge,
but as said, if need to provide access to gpl'd
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 16:39, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:46:59 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating
people for the next Gentoo Council
I nominate SpanKY, vapier and Mike Frysinger.
thanks, one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 16:39, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 02:46:59 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating
people for the next Gentoo
On Thursday 06 July 2006 01:36, Joshua Jackson wrote:
does that mean that only one third of your personalities will be
productive in meetings and the other two disruptive?
Probably only that one will be productive, two disruptive, and the other we'll
know when we'll see.
--
Diego Flameeyes
All-
Just thought I'd update you on some of issue's we've been having with
bugzilla.g.o lately. Yes, its been slow in the last few months, but
today has been even slower than normal. The primary reason being another
large OSS project's database was added to the same server which appeared
to cause
Yay for new servers! :) Hopefully, this should fix the performance
issues thats been occuring for the last 5 months or so.
~ Nick
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:45 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
All-
Just thought I'd update you on some of issue's we've been having with
bugzilla.g.o lately. Yes,
* Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
Sorry if that doesn't sound very nice, but could you please stop posting
to this list every time you have an issue, especially if the information
you are looking for is easily available (here for instance, just click
on the hyperlinks to see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
All-
Just thought I'd update you on some of issue's we've been having with
bugzilla.g.o lately. Yes, its been slow in the last few months, but
today has been even slower than normal. The primary reason being another
large
On 7/5/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, if this short question cannot be anwered with an short help
or an direct pointer to some help, it seems my contribution obviously
isn't wanted. So I won't waste anymore of your and my time on this
topic and don't file a bug. Just forget
Lance Albertson wrote:
Please thank GNI for helping us out! They really deserve a lot for
helping us :).
Thanks-
[1] http://www.gni.com/
Thank you GNI!
droolmmm blade cluster/drool
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
when merging things from ${D} to ${ROOT}, portage currently will make sure
that the permissions in ${D} for files are retained after merging into
${ROOT}, but not for directories
for example, consider an ebuild that:
- creates dir /usr/share/foo with foo:foo ownership and 777 permissions
-
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:04:07PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi everyone,
Has anyone noticed that java-pkg-2.eclass makes it difficult to use
pre/post phase hooks in /etc/portage/bashrc?
Yep, they were greenlighted _only_ because it's a workaround for bug
#56408, bad environment handling by
67 matches
Mail list logo
