On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to
our users.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5 March 2010 21:51, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
are going to
El vie, 05-03-2010 a las 22:06 +0100, Ben de Groot escribió:
If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
are going to split it up again, you will have some explaining to do to
our users. I
Do we have any Courier maintainers?
courier-authlib is vulnerable to CVE-2009-3736 (internal copy of
libltdl) [1]
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254062
It seems a bit too important package to be masked, but that's what will
happen if noone cares
On 6 March 2010 10:11, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
If no, I can split off utils from poppler - with CMake it's effortless.
We just rejoined the split poppler into one package again. So if you
are going to
On 03/05/2010 08:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 5 March 2010 04:18, Graham Murraygra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
3. Include one or both of the packages in the stage tarball.
None of the packages involved (gtk+, cups and poppler) is in any
shape or form essential, so you will have a very hard
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010)
# Doesn't compile wrt #287698 and is untested with libxklavier-4
# and libxklavier-5. Also deps on dummy gail package.
#
# Masked for removal in 60 days unless someone picks it up.
#
x11-misc/glunarclock
On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and
for supplementary information Status Whiteboard could be used.
I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient,
Am Samstag 06 März 2010 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
Do we have any Courier maintainers?
I sort-of maintained courier in the past, although due to the number of issues
and the complexity, I hesitated to add myself as a maintainer.
I'll take care of the security issue and try to get that handled
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs. Otherwise it will be a real
trouble for us to sort things out. If adding more than one keywords
breaks anything, then I can tell you now it is already broken.
The only thing that
On 03/06/2010 04:24 AM, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 5 March 2010 04:18, Graham Murraygra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
3. Include one or both of the packages in the stage tarball.
None of the packages involved (gtk+, cups and poppler) is in any
shape or
+# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010)
+# Masked for QA, treecleaners, security
+#
+# Internal copy of vuln. dev-libs/expat
+#
+# Masked for removal in 60 days
+dev-lisp/cl-albert
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Would it be possible to make cups a PDEPEND in gtk+ or is it really
needed at compile time?
cups is definitely needed at compile-time
The same for cups: can we make poppler a PDEPEND? Maciej, did
you get any further with
On Saturday 06 of March 2010 18:05:20 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Would it be possible to make cups a PDEPEND in gtk+ or is it really
needed at compile time?
cups is definitely needed at compile-time
The same for cups:
On 03/06/2010 02:11 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
What we use in Java is JAVA_PKG_OPT_USE to declare what use flag the
DEPENDs should be under. This approach doesn't allow the ebuild
maintainer to forget adding the depends.
That approach also disallows (or makes unduly difficult) making the
On Sex, 2010-03-05 at 19:03 +0100, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2010 17:12:23 Roy Bamford wrote:
That's not a new install as per the handbook. Neither are you a new
user as you have a premade make.conf and world file and some experience
with Gentoo.
Put yourself in
On 03/06/2010 08:28 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 03/06/2010 02:11 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
What we use in Java is JAVA_PKG_OPT_USE to declare what use flag the
DEPENDs should be under. This approach doesn't allow the ebuild
maintainer to forget adding the depends.
That approach also
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's flags mechanism is for.
Now that's what I wanted. Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:09 PM, David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This
On Friday 05 March 2010 20:22:44 Duncan wrote:
Ed W posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:33:43 + as excerpted:
I think I have mostly upgraded my machines, but I completely agree - I
sometimes let some old virtual machines sit unbooted for a year and then
suddenly want to use them and bring
On 03/07/2010 12:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2010 20:22:44 Duncan wrote:
Ed W posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:33:43 + as excerpted:
I think I have mostly upgraded my machines, but I completely agree - I
sometimes let some old virtual machines sit unbooted for a year and
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (07 Mar 2010)
# These won't compile against =dev-libs/dvutil-1.
#
# Also, dvutil-1 is unslotted and won't compile with recent
# toolchain.
#
# No updates available from upstream.
#
# Bugs 247054, 251605 and 251608.
#
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
On Saturday 06 March 2010 17:47:04 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 03/07/2010 12:31 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2010 20:22:44 Duncan wrote:
Ed W posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:33:43 + as excerpted:
I think I have mostly upgraded my machines, but I completely agree - I
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like -Wl,-O1,--as-needed won't be affected by any
kind of filter since there are no spaces to separate each
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
If no one objects, I will look forward to committing the patch in a
week or two.
commit it already :p
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 03/06/10 20:09, David Leverton wrote:
This sounds like the sort of thing Bugzilla's flags mechanism is for.
http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html
Good idea!
What I wonder now is:
- Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
- Can certain flag states be required
On 03/06/10 08:08, Petteri Räty wrote:
After the move is done could you please come up with a list of all the
things you needed to take into account and then work with me for example
to get it included in devmanual.
Good idea.
I opened a bug for it so we don't forget about it.
On Thursday 04 March 2010 19:32:10 Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:07:17PM -0600, Dale wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So I
Fabian Groffen wrote:
# Fabian Groffengrob...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010)
# Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to
# support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928
# Pending removal on April 6, 2010
app-antivirus/f-prot
I use f-prot once in a blue moon and have
29 matches
Mail list logo
