Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 11 mai 2010 à 06:35 +0100, Graham Murray a écrit : Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes: if you're digging around then clearly you havent done the obvious and run revdep-rebuild ? that is pretty user-friendly. I do not know if I had done something wrong beforehand, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread Petteri Räty
On 05/11/2010 01:41 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: lafilefixer is not the right tool for this. At least it's current scope is to replace usage of la files in la files, not to replace occurences of one lib with another. Plus the problem of lafilefixer not changing the hash of the installed

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread George Prowse
On 11/05/2010 04:52, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 10 May 2010 23:10:48 Markos Chandras wrote: provide a user friendly way to migrate to the new libpng without the need to spend so many hours digging around on which packages to rebuild. if you're digging around then clearly you havent done

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 16:05:19 George Prowse wrote: On 11/05/2010 04:52, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 10 May 2010 23:10:48 Markos Chandras wrote: provide a user friendly way to migrate to the new libpng without the need to spend so many hours digging around on which packages to

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread Graham Murray
George Prowse george.pro...@gmail.com writes: I have run revdep-rebuild about 30 times and I still can't fix it. revdep-rebuild does not fix it and libpng needs to have some serious action before it goes stable because I booted into, basically a completely broken machine because I had to stop

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-11 Thread Francesco R
2010/5/11 Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk George Prowse george.pro...@gmail.com writes: I have run revdep-rebuild about 30 times and I still can't fix it. revdep-rebuild does not fix it and libpng needs to have some serious action before it goes stable because I booted into, basically

[gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hello guys, as I'm sure some of you already experimented, the libpng upgrade didn't exactly went smoothly on my chroots. Reason seems to be that libpng usage is odd, it provides both libpng14.* and libpng.* files. Some packages likes to use versioned libs while some other don't and it seems to

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Peng Hsin-shun
Mask it. It's too new to adapt. 2010/5/11 Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org Hello guys, as I'm sure some of you already experimented, the libpng upgrade didn't exactly went smoothly on my chroots. Reason seems to be that libpng usage is odd, it provides both libpng14.* and libpng.*

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/10/2010 08:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Hello guys, as I'm sure some of you already experimented, the libpng upgrade didn't exactly went smoothly on my chroots. Reason seems to be that libpng usage is odd, it provides both libpng14.* and libpng.* files. Some packages likes to

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 5/10/10 7:27 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: Should we advise users to do something like: find /usr/lib -name '*.la' | xargs sed -i -e '/^dep/s:-lpng12:-lpng14:' lafilefixer --justfixit is easier to remember. Does it work equally well? Paweł signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 05/10/2010 08:34 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 5/10/10 7:27 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: Should we advise users to do something like: find /usr/lib -name '*.la' | xargs sed -i -e '/^dep/s:-lpng12:-lpng14:' lafilefixer --justfixit is easier to remember. Does it work equally well? Paweł

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 5/10/10 7:42 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 05/10/2010 08:34 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 5/10/10 7:27 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: Should we advise users to do something like: find /usr/lib -name '*.la' | xargs sed -i -e '/^dep/s:-lpng12:-lpng14:' lafilefixer --justfixit is easier to

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 10 May 2010 13:27:48 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 05/10/2010 08:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: * what is the recommended way to link to libpng (versioned lib or not) * corollary to previous question, should we enforce link to versioned lib only ? You get correct lib to link

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Monday 10 May 2010 20:22:28 Peng Hsin-shun wrote: Mask it. It's too new to adapt. 2010/5/11 Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org Hello guys, as I'm sure some of you already experimented, the libpng upgrade didn't exactly went smoothly on my chroots. Reason seems to be that

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
lafilefixer is not the right tool for this. At least it's current scope is to replace usage of la files in la files, not to replace occurences of one lib with another. Plus the problem of lafilefixer not changing the hash of the installed files to match the one recorded in vdb is not solved so I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On Monday 10 May 2010 23:09:22 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 05/10/2010 10:52 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On Monday 10 May 2010 20:22:28 Peng Hsin-shun wrote: Mask it. It's too new to adapt. Gentoo's ~arch is now fully migrated to libpng-1.4. So is Arch Linux, btw. After releasing it in ~arch,

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 10 May 2010 23:10:48 Markos Chandras wrote: provide a user friendly way to migrate to the new libpng without the need to spend so many hours digging around on which packages to rebuild. if you're digging around then clearly you havent done the obvious and run revdep-rebuild ? that

Re: [gentoo-dev] About libpng-1.4 handling

2010-05-10 Thread Graham Murray
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes: if you're digging around then clearly you havent done the obvious and run revdep-rebuild ? that is pretty user-friendly. I do not know if I had done something wrong beforehand, but simply running revdep-rebuild did not work for me - a number of