On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:14:37 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 28 July 2003 12:27, Collins Richey wrote:
3. XF86Config has
load glx (no load dri)
using driver 'nv'
'nv' is the xfree86 driver. The name of the nvidia driver is 'nvidia'.
Change you XF86Config
Have converted to the nvidia drivers. Looks ok, but glxgears will not
run:
Xlib: extension GLX missing on display :0.0.
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
After much googling, I don't see the answer.
I have
1. emerged nvidia-kernel and nvidial-glx (4363)
2.
Have converted to the nvidia drivers. Looks ok, but glxgears will not
run:
Xlib: extension GLX missing on display :0.0.
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
After much googling, I don't see the answer.
I have
1. emerged nvidia-kernel and nvidial-glx (4363)
2.
On Monday 28 July 2003 12:27, Collins Richey wrote:
3. XF86Config has
load glx (no load dri)
using driver 'nv'
'nv' is the xfree86 driver. The name of the nvidia driver is 'nvidia'. Change
you XF86Config to that and everything should work fine.
Jason
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 05:35:13PM +1200 or thereabouts, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:22, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
Are you using the driver from Nvidia site? It's one file and needs to be made
executable. After doing this, from a console (can't install this driver while in
be in X ( eg. X = RGB, monitor manufacture =
RBG) so a slight color distorment may happen.
Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rasile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2003 00:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia Drivers
On Tue Jun
Has anybody upgraded to 4363-r2 drivers? I am running a Ti4600 and
wondered if any problems had been encounted - performance
degregation/gains?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202 9A82 82AC B1EA 402E 340E]
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 402E340E
On Mon Jun 02, 2003 at 08:46:51PM + or thereabouts, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Has anybody upgraded to 4363-r2 drivers? I am running a Ti4600 and
wondered if any problems had been encounted - performance
degregation/gains?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202 9A82
Why didn't you use the one in portage? what changes did you make in your
XF86Config file?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202 9A82 82AC B1EA 402E 340E]
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 402E340E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi,
On Monday 02 June 2003 22:46, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Has anybody upgraded to 4363-r2 drivers? I am running a Ti4600 and
wondered if any problems had been encounted - performance
degregation/gains?
I did.
Nothing visibly changed, they are just working.
(with a gf 4-mx 440)
Glück Auf
Volker
I did.
Nothing visibly changed, they are just working.
(with a gf 4-mx 440)
Same for me (same GPU). :).
Dmitry.
--
Gentoo Linux 2.4.20 #1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon Jun 02, 2003 at 09:38:18PM + or thereabouts, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Why didn't you use the one in portage? what changes did you make in your
XF86Config file?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202 9A82 82AC B1EA 402E 340E]
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 10:19, Michael Rasile wrote:
On Mon Jun 02, 2003 at 09:38:18PM + or thereabouts, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Why didn't you use the one in portage? what changes did you make in your
XF86Config file?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
GPGKID [402E340E] [182C F930 C7E4 CA70 A202
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 02:28:38PM +1200 or thereabouts, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 10:19, Michael Rasile wrote:
On Mon Jun 02, 2003 at 09:38:18PM + or thereabouts, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Why didn't you use the one in portage? what changes did you make in your
XF86Config
Huge gains over 3191 with 3d, and 4191 in 2d... for me. :)
---
Scott Carmichael
http://jobeus.net/
--[ UxBoD ]-- said on 06.02.03 at 20:46:
Has anybody upgraded to 4363-r2 drivers? I am running a Ti4600 and
wondered if any problems had been encounted - performance
degregation/gains?
--
Are you using the driver from Nvidia site? It's one file and needs to be made
executable. After doing this, from a console (can't install this driver while in X)
you simply type ./Name of driver and everything should be taken care of. It will not
find a module in the kernel for this
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 03:22:07PM +1200 or thereabouts, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
Are you using the driver from Nvidia site? It's one file and needs to be made
executable. After doing this, from a console (can't install this driver while in
X) you simply type ./Name of driver and everything
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 11:33, Michael Rasile wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
HMMM...Well, if you are using Gentoo (:-)) then you have the kernel source and the
header files. What flavor of kernel are you using. This should not make a
difference, though. I'm using gentoo-sources and I
An interesting note. At work we run alot of Geforce cards and have been
having problems with them when using any driver after 2880. Recently
learned from nVidia people that all Geforce cards do not lock well to
vertical retrace when used in a vertical sync locked GL mode, which
matchs our
The key here is the unresolved symbols. I would guess that you have
recompiled your kernel. nVidia's kernel module has a core of
propriatary binary. Which means you have to be extra careful. Do a
"make clean" before every kernel build and build both bzImage and
modules. I also think that it is
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:22, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
Are you using the driver from Nvidia site? It's one file and needs to be made
executable. After doing this, from a console (can't install this driver while in
X) you simply type ./Name of driver and everything should be taken care of. It
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 00:35, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:22, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
Are you using the driver from Nvidia site? It's one file and needs to be made
executable. After doing this, from a console (can't install this driver while in
X) you simply type ./Name
Collins wrote:
Just idle curiosity. I have a Geforce2 64Meg card, and I'm using the standard
xfree driver for desktop work without any problems. I don't do games.
Is there any benefit from screwing around with the kernel and various Nvidia
drivers for desktop users?
In a nutshell: no.
The
23 matches
Mail list logo
