[gentoo-user] devfs and zip (Was: Progress bars??)

2004-02-01 Thread Fred Labrosse
gabriel writes: devfs is awesome. it found my compactflash cardreader with no problems whatsoever. i can't possibly condone a switch. Maybe, but it only finds my zip drive if I have a disk in it when I boot. Or am I missing something? Fred -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Collins
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:34:59 -0800 Ben Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. I wound up pretty much redoing the install. Everything seems to work now... so far. And while I was working on the reinstall, it occured to me what the original

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
thanks for taking the time to let me know that... i wunder what the heck the problem was... b Collins wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:34:59 -0800 Ben Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. I wound up pretty much redoing the install. Everything

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Jerry McBride
On Thursday 01 January 2004 01:34 am, Ben Munat wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. I wound up pretty much redoing the install. Everything seems to work now... so far. And while I was working on the reinstall, it occured to me what the original problem probably was.

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Collins
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:51:50 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 January 2004 01:34 am, Ben Munat wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. [ snipped ] Call me OLD FASHION, but devfs is the first thing I dump after installing gentoo on a new

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 14:13, Collins wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:51:50 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 January 2004 01:34 am, Ben Munat wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. [ snipped ] Call me OLD FASHION, but devfs is the

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
I had compiled the kernel w/o devfs... gentoo kept telling me I should have it... recompiled the kernel with devfs... boot failed right after devfs was mounted cuz /dev was empty except .devfsd and initctl. Never figured out why it was doing that... reinstalled. Now that I'm running with devfs

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Collins
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:23:10 -0500 Lincoln A. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 14:13, Collins wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:51:50 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 January 2004 01:34 am, Ben Munat wrote: Just wanted to follow up in case

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2004-01-01 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 19:37, Collins wrote: On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:23:10 -0500 Lincoln A. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 14:13, Collins wrote: On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 13:51:50 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 01 January 2004 01:34 am,

[gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Munat
Hello, I recently built my first gentoo install, but discovered that I had inadvertently left devfs support out of the kernel. So, I recompiled (gentoo-sources) with devfs support and devfs mount on boot. However, I can't boot with this new kernel; the /sbin/rc script starts throwing

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Norbert Kamenicky
Ben Munat wrote: Hello, I recently built my first gentoo install, but discovered that I had inadvertently left devfs support out of the kernel. So, I recompiled (gentoo-sources) with devfs support and devfs mount on boot. However, I can't boot with this new kernel; the /sbin/rc script starts

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Munat
Norbert Kamenicky wrote: AFAIK there is no possibility to disable /dev/null to work in .config, therefore I think your kernel failed to mount /dev filesystem ... Have you got /dev directory ? What about other devices ? (e.g. /dev/hda1) noro Noro, Thank you very much for responding. I was just

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Norbert Kamenicky
Ben Munat wrote: Thank you very much for responding. I was just considering wiping all the drives and starting all over again... but it seems like there must be a (fairly) easy solution to this. Agreed, it must be some problem with config. I wasn't thinking I had disabled /dev/null in the

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Munat
Norbert Kamenicky wrote: h ... which mount devfs command ? In which script ? AFAIK kernel is mounting /dev itself (if devfs support is compilled in). I do not have any line for devfs in /etc/fstab also ... if u have one, comment it out ! The mount devfs command is in /sbin/rc. I tried taking

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem

2003-12-31 Thread Ben Munat
Just wanted to follow up in case anyone was wondering. I wound up pretty much redoing the install. Everything seems to work now... so far. And while I was working on the reinstall, it occured to me what the original problem probably was. When I recompiled the kernel to add in devfs, I don't

[gentoo-user] devfs problem: permission denied on /dev/null... boot fails

2003-12-30 Thread Ben Munat
I've been working on getting my first attempt at installing gentoo working for the last three days. Well, I actually had the basic system installed, was able to log in, started working on installing X, etc. But, everytime I rebooted, the gentoo startup script was kind enough to rub it in that

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs problem: permission denied on /dev/null... boot fails [update]

2003-12-30 Thread Ben Munat
Update: I've been studying the rc script where the error (/dev/null: permission denied) occured. I'm no expert on shell scripts, but I was able to figure out how to put in an if statement to test if /dev/null exists. And guess what? It doesn't! In other words, permission wuz denied cuz it don't

[gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and toward udev? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Collins
On Friday 26 December 2003 23:16, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and toward udev? You should read this discussion http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1893. devfs has been

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Saturday 27 December 2003 08:16, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and toward udev? First, obsolete means not, that it will disappear suddenly. There were functions obsolete

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Redeeman
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 16:17, Collins wrote: On Friday 26 December 2003 23:16, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and toward udev? You should read this discussion

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Collins
On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:37, Redeeman wrote: On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 16:17, Collins wrote: On Friday 26 December 2003 23:16, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs and udev (kernel 2.6 and beyond)

2003-12-27 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:16:44 -0500 Lincoln A. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The 2.6.0 series kernels and later consider devfs obsolete. | | Does anyone know the gentoo road map for moving away from devfs and | toward udev? The ~arch baselayout supports udev. There's a bug about this

[gentoo-user] DEVFS question - are compatibility names necessary?

2003-07-21 Thread Andy Arbon
Hello, How long are the compatibility names going to be necessary for devfsd? I tried turning them off in /etc/devfsd.conf to see what would happen and bootup didn't proceed very well, as fdisk was not able to find any /dev/hda* devices to work on. This leads to two questions - is there a

Re: [gentoo-user] DEVFS question - are compatibility namesnecessary?

2003-07-21 Thread brett holcomb
As long as nothing needs the names you can ditch them - the rub is what needs the names G. For fstab you could probably put the full device name in instead of /dev/hda put /dev/.. However, if an app doesn't let you specifiy a device but assumes somethng such as /dev/hdc then you need

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-15 Thread Spider
begin quote On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 22:12:51 -0400 Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett I. Holcomb wrote: Per the Install docs - make sure experimental options is checked. I hate to say this, but can't these LiveCD default settings be baked into the gentoo-source kernel image so we

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-15 Thread Tom Allison
Spider wrote: begin quote On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 22:12:51 -0400 Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brett I. Holcomb wrote: Per the Install docs - make sure experimental options is checked. I hate to say this, but can't these LiveCD default settings be baked into the gentoo-source kernel image

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Tom Allison
I can fix this with appending devfs=mount into the kernel options. Actually, I can't. It's not working. I also read through some of the other emails and I don't have a /proc/config entry to read off my kernel configuration, but 'grep DEVFS /usr/src/linux/.config' shows that I have:

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Hello all, I am happy to find this thread because I have a strange problem: This morning I recompiled my kernel (I used stage3 default), and kept the old one in /boot in case my setup didnt work. When I rebooted I had an error message telling me that devfs was missing and then I rebooted in the

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Tom Wesley
On Saturday 14 June 2003 15:48, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: Hello all, I am happy to find this thread because I have a strange problem: This morning I recompiled my kernel (I used stage3 default), and kept the old one in /boot in case my setup didnt work. When I rebooted I had an error

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Collins Richey
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:20:34 +0200 Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev file system support (EXPERIMENTAL) [*] Automatically mount at boot (These are called CONFIG_DEVFS_FS and CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT in your .config file)

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Per the Install docs - make sure experimental options is checked. Hello all, I am happy to find this thread because I have a strange problem: This morning I recompiled my kernel (I used stage3 default), and kept the old one in /boot in case my setup didnt work. When I rebooted I had an

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Le samedi 14 juin à 16 h. 00, Tom Wesley a écrit notamment: Content-Description: signed data On Saturday 14 June 2003 15:48, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote: Hello all, I am happy to find this thread because I have a strange problem: This morning I recompiled my kernel (I used stage3 default),

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Tom Allison
Brett I. Holcomb wrote: Per the Install docs - make sure experimental options is checked. I hate to say this, but can't these LiveCD default settings be baked into the gentoo-source kernel image so we aren't always stumbling against the same problems over and over again? Or perhaps we could

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-14 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Well, we don't want the LiveCD stuff baked into the Gentoo source - or any kernel. The point of the kernel building section is to produce a kernel for our systems - not a generic, safe, will work anywhere one. To make a useful kernel means we select things like file systems, peripheral

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Mika Fischer
* Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 09:16]: Either way, you also have to specify that devfs is run automatically at boot time. Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount in your menu.lst Cheers, Mika -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Allison
Mika Fischer wrote: * Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 09:16]: Either way, you also have to specify that devfs is run automatically at boot time. Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount in your menu.lst Cheers, Mika -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list So I should be able to just

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread brett holcomb
You also need to build the kernel with autostart on boot for devfs. On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 22:20:32 -0400 Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little stuck. I didn't build my kernel with devfs support. So I set CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y rebuild the kernel copy to /boot/bzImage and then what? I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread tallison
You also need to build the kernel with autostart on boot for devfs. Thanks. I think there is already a bug report on this devfs problem. But it would save a lot of time to have it outlined in the Installation Docs. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Mika Fischer
Hi, Tom! * Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 12:50]: Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount So I should be able to just edit the grub menu and be done with this? There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev file system support (EXPERIMENTAL) [*]

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Allison
Mika Fischer wrote: Hi, Tom! * Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 12:50]: Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount So I should be able to just edit the grub menu and be done with this? There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev file system support (EXPERIMENTAL)

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Rasmus Wiman
Mika Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Tom! * Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 12:50]: Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount So I should be able to just edit the grub menu and be done with this? There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Allison
Mika Fischer wrote: Hi, Tom! * Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 12:50]: Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount So I should be able to just edit the grub menu and be done with this? There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev file system support

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Allison
Tom Allison wrote: Mika Fischer wrote: Hi, Tom! * Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-06-13 12:50]: Or use: kernel /boot/bzImage ... devfs=mount So I should be able to just edit the grub menu and be done with this? There are *two* relevant options in the kernel config: [*] /dev

[gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-12 Thread Tom Allison
I'm a little stuck. I didn't build my kernel with devfs support. So I set CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y rebuild the kernel copy to /boot/bzImage and then what? I'm using grub and I've never used it before. IIRC unlike lilo I don't have to run anything for it to be seen the next time I boot the PC. In

Re: [gentoo-user] devfs

2003-06-12 Thread Phil Barnett
On Thursday 12 June 2003 10:20 pm, Tom Allison wrote: I'm a little stuck. I didn't build my kernel with devfs support. So I set CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y rebuild the kernel copy to /boot/bzImage and then what? I'm using grub and I've never used it before. IIRC unlike lilo I don't have to run