Alan McKinnon schrieb:
If I have identically named packages with the *same* version number in the
portage tree and in an overlay, how do I mask the overlay version without
deleting the overlay?
I have kde-testing enabled to get koffice:2, but some packages conflict with
portage, like
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hi Dale,
currently I am runnning nvidia-drivers-173.14.15 for my FX-5600 and
kernel version x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
I don't know, if the driver 173.14.15 works for you, but if it does,
than kernel 2.6.27 might me a solution.
kind regards,
der Max
I was
Dale wrote:
zhen wrote:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Do you, or anyone, know if this is a kernel thing or
zhen wrote:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Do you, or anyone, know if this is a kernel thing or is this a nvidia
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel, namely
support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/elog/x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-173.14.09:20090401-103106.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/temp
=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc clean module
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/elog/x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-173.14.09:20090401-103106.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Well, I copied my old config over and ran make oldconfig. I did try to
boot it
SYSOUT=/usr/src/linux
HOST_CC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc clean module
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/elog/x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-173.14.09:20090401-120715.log'.
* The ebuild environment
zhen schrieb:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel,
Maximilian Bräutigam schrieb:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 05:34 -0500 schrieb Dale:
Maximilian Bräutigam
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
else.
Here is some info: From lspci:
00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Thank you for the reference! I've read the guide and now my combination
(nvidia
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
else.
Here is some info: From lspci:
Hi,
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.4.1.ebuild from layman/java-overlay
contains
CDEPEND=.
=dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.25-r1:2.4
What does that mean?
I have
dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-6.0.18
installed in the 2.5 slot.
But portage wants to emerge tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.27 which
is
2009/4/1 Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de:
Hi,
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.4.1.ebuild from layman/java-overlay
contains
CDEPEND=.
=dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.25-r1:2.4
What does that mean?
I have
dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-6.0.18
installed in the 2.5 slot.
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
else.
Here is some
Dale wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
else.
Here is some
Hung Dang wrote:
Dale wrote:
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
years ago for exactly the reason you mention:
dir mods of 02770 make it easy to share files
but require 002 umask. Fix was to set the
per-user group, allowing private dir's
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never
tried them on
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:55:31 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
years ago for exactly the reason you mention:
dir mods of 02770 make it easy to share files
but require 002
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:01:15 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never
tried them on (except in a couple of classroom exercises years ago),
so I don't know if they're any joy. Would they allow me to force all
files under a directory,
Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
That being said, is there anyone who
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 17:01:15 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
That being said, is
I was only able to test briefly and got it working, but only when i
did it manually.
Seems adding a rmmod line in local.stop doesnt help, I've been trying
to add other lines before like killall -9 mplayer (which is the main
prog using the sound device usually).
I'll be able to work my way!
I have a Brother QL-570 label printer printing on 29x90mm labels. My
goal is to have 6 characters printed across the center of the label.
It prints like this:
$ echo 123456 | lpr
but the text is in the upper corner of the label, it has the wrong
orientation, and the font is too small.
Florian Philipp schrieb:
Hi list!
A quick question:
If i install Gentoo on a system with a kernel version 2.6.9 (don't ask
...), are there issues I should be aware of?
Do I have to mask newer glibc-versions, newer kernel headers or some use
flags? What about the nptl use flag?
On 1 Apr 2009, at 17:52, Grant wrote:
...
Ah, postscript works!
...
Thanks a lot for the info and I'll
get to work on a postscript script.
Looks like text2ps might be worth a look.
http://pwet.fr/man/linux/commandes/text2ps
I can't find the Gentoo package, but `eix -S postscript` finds a
Reading what I can find about it, I'm not
sure it is necessary?
If so, can I renice it or only let it run once and a while,
it's a drag on system resources
ideas?
James
...
Ah, postscript works!
...
Thanks a lot for the info and I'll
get to work on a postscript script.
Looks like text2ps might be worth a look.
http://pwet.fr/man/linux/commandes/text2ps
I can't find the Gentoo package, but `eix -S postscript` finds a number of
similar-looking tools.
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
ease of reading and following the thread
down the posting. It's also just a standard
convention, not often follow in the windoz
world.
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, james wrote:
Reading what I can find about it, I'm not
sure it is necessary?
no
If so, can I renice it or only let it run once and a while,
it's a drag on system resources
ideas?
system-settings, advanced, 'desktop search' deactivate 'enable nepomuk
Hi group,
I posted the following at the sysrescuecd forum but I despair of ever getting a
worthwhile answer:
I've got a tripleE 900A with 4G SSHD running Xandros and I want to use the
sysrescueCD to install gentoo. But I have to be able to use the wifi
driver(ATH5K). There's no problem
* maxim wexler (bliss...@yahoo.com) [01.04.09 23:44]:
Hi group,
Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of Win98!
Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
--
Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. Karl Marx
s...@sti@N GÜNTHER mailto:sam...@guenther-roetgen.de
Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of
Win98!
Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
Xandros has already used up *all* of the HD on one partition. I can't format
the drive without destroying the OS which is installing it. There isn't even
enough room to download the
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:12:03 +0200, Sebastian Günther wrote:
Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
No gcc, no chroot, no good.
I used eeXbuntu to install mine.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 33: American history
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello all,
I followed the gentoo instructions to properly update to the new version
of GCC. I read from other posts that it isn't truly nessecary to
re-emerge any packages for this particular upgrade, but i'm still fairly
new to Gentoo so i figured i'd do it just for the practice.
so anyway,
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
I ran emerge -eav system followed by emerge -eav world. Needless to say
this produced several packages that needed to be rebuilt. 168 for system
and 630 for world.
My main question is what exactly does the -e option do
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:55:31 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark lemb...@wrkhors.com wrote:
That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
years ago for exactly the reason
James wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
ease of reading and following the thread
down the posting. It's also just a standard
convention, not often
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
OK. Everyone that hates top posting please reply with a +1. I'll start.
+1 No top posting
* maxim wexler (bliss...@yahoo.com) [02.04.09 01:04]:
Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of
Win98!
Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
Xandros has already used up *all* of the HD on one partition. I can't
format the drive without destroying the OS which is
44 matches
Mail list logo
