On 28 Feb, Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
If I want to automagically replace text in a file, I can use `sed`. I don't
believe that `sed` can be invoked in such a way to change the file in place,
therefore two commands are necessary:
$ sed 's/Project Gutenberg/Wordsworth Classics/' foo
On Monday 01 March 2010 06:16:09 Harry Putnam wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
FWIW, Solaris syslogd is like other basic tools on Solaris: standards
compliant in that it caters for the lowest common denominator that
comprises Unix. Which is to say, almost always useless
Hi,
my setup here is a running Postix MTA which stores all incoming mail
into a single file (per user) in mbox format (/var/spool/mail/$USER)
I'm desparately looking for a mail client with a GUI which can handle
that.
I didn't manage to configure Thunderbird(-3.0.1) (it always tries to set
up an
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
my setup here is a running Postix MTA which stores all incoming mail
into a single file (per user) in mbox format (/var/spool/mail/$USER)
I'm desparately looking for a mail client with a GUI which can handle
that.
I
On Monday 01 March 2010 03:47:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 01:07:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Don't read my post as literally meaning they must type the 7 characters
sudo su. Read it more as use any feature of sudo you feel like to
get a root shell, but you must use sudo. As
On Monday 01 March 2010 11:08:27 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
my setup here is a running Postix MTA which stores all incoming mail
into a single file (per user) in mbox format (/var/spool/mail/$USER)
I'm
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:08:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
We just log the fact of running sudo. The admins are trusted to not
cock things up, and if they do, to not try and hide it. The philosophy
is simple - if we feel we can't trust you, we would not have hired you.
That is sensible, if not
Harry Putnam writes:
All fail when aclocal is trotted out. I don't see recent threads here
about it... googling turns up a herd of bugs involving aclocal but
then newest is 2008.
The newest threads here that even mention aclocal date around Jan 20.
I didn't change the compiler
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot get
through anyway.
- Mark
yeah, it's really down: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.gentoo.org
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot get
through anyway.
- Mark
--
Crístian Deives dos Santos Viana [aka CD1]
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Crístian Viana cristiandei...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, it's really down: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.gentoo.org
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/02/10 01:24, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot get
through anyway.
- Mark
Confirmed, though I can still ping it.
Guess I'll have to wait for some nvidia
I've found a few people referencing to a 30-day stabilization policy
which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
considered for stabilization, but is there any document that serves as
an official guideline/checklist on how to consider to stabilize a
package? Is the 30-day
On 03/02/10 01:24, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot get
through anyway.
- Mark
Confirmed, though I can still ping it.
Alex Schuster wrote:
[KDE4 problems]
And so on. But it's not so bad I cannot work with it (well, sometimes
it is, and then I have to fix it, like when the password dialog no
longer accepted passwords), and so I keep using it, waiting it to
become really stable and usable.
And another weekend
On 3/1/10, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/02/10 01:24, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess the web site is down this morning? (6:30AM PST) I cannot get
through anyway.
- Mark
Confirmed, though I can still ping it.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 07:34:30 -0800
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Guess I'll have to wait for some nvidia installation instructions.
Thanks!
you may try the wiki though...
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Main_Page
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:30:40PM +0100, Daniel Wagener wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 07:34:30 -0800
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Guess I'll have to wait for some nvidia installation instructions.
Thanks!
you may try the wiki though...
If any dev from the vmware overlay reads this, please fix this one:
Calculating dependencies / * Digest verification failed:
*
/var/lib/layman/vmware/app-emulation/vmware-workstation/vmware-workstation-7.0.1.227600.ebuild
* Reason: Failed on RMD160 verification
* Got:
On 1 March 2010 15:04, Peter Ruskin peter.rus...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
On Sunday 28 February 2010 23:51:21 Mick wrote:
I have now succeeded at achieving what I wanted: to use the
Windows 7 boot manager (bootmgr.exe) which is the successor to
NTLDR to chainload GRUB from it and so leave the
(this is a rather obvious fix...)
eselect news has a new notice, advising of the pending change of the
presumed location of the layman directory from /usr/local/portage/layman
to /var/lib/layman. It offers three ways to deal with this location
change. I chose alternative A. (actually moving the
On 03/01/2010 08:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
(this is a rather obvious fix...)
eselect news has a new notice, advising of the pending change of the
presumed location of the layman directory from /usr/local/portage/layman
to /var/lib/layman. It offers three ways to deal with this location
change.
On Monday 01 March 2010 18:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:
On the other hand, from time to time I have show-stoppers, and then I
cannot use kmail, or no KDE4 at all. And have to invest time to solve
this. And there are these annoying things. Like Amarok being very
unstable, and taking 5 minutes
On Monday 01 March 2010 17:39:47 Lie Ryan wrote:
I've found a few people referencing to a 30-day stabilization policy
which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
considered for stabilization, but is there any document that serves as
an official guideline/checklist on how
On Monday 01 March 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
If any dev from the vmware overlay reads this, please fix this one:
Calculating dependencies / * Digest verification failed:
*
/var/lib/layman/vmware/app-emulation/vmware-workstation/vmware-workstation-
7.0.1.227600.ebuild * Reason: Failed
On 03/01/10 13:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-01 1:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
So layman users choosing alternative A. now may want to add a step;
after moving the directory, put a soft link in the /usr/local/portage
pointing to the new location; i.e.
cd /usr/local/portage; ln -s
On 2010-03-01 1:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
So layman users choosing alternative A. now may want to add a step;
after moving the directory, put a soft link in the /usr/local/portage
pointing to the new location; i.e.
cd /usr/local/portage; ln -s /var/lib/layman layman
Thanks, I was planning
On 03/01/10 13:26, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/01/2010 08:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
(this is a rather obvious fix...)
eselect news has a new notice, advising of the pending change of the
presumed location of the layman directory from /usr/local/portage/layman
to /var/lib/layman. It offers
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Monday 01 March 2010 18:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:
On the other hand, from time to time I have show-stoppers, and then I
cannot use kmail, or no KDE4 at all. And have to invest time to solve
this. And there are these
On Monday 01 March 2010 20:30:24 Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-01 1:08 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
So layman users choosing alternative A. now may want to add a step;
after moving the directory, put a soft link in the /usr/local/portage
pointing to the new location; i.e.
cd
On Monday 01 March 2010 21:07:18 Dale wrote:
And to think I have been in KDE 4 for almost a week now. Maybe this is
to soon to remove KDE 3?
To be fair, amarok is not part of KDE-4, it's a third party add-on to the KDE
framework. Not much the KDE devs can do about that except encourage the
On 2010-03-01 2:02 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
I did; I simply moved the whole layman directory. Works.
Yeah, but I didn't start off using layman when I added my first local
ebuild a long time ago, so they are not under layman - they are at the
same level - ie, /usr/local/portage contains:
On 2010-03-01 1:26 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf
Also - why /var/lib/layman, and not /var/lib/portage/layman? It looks a
little odd just dumped in there all by itself.
--
Charles
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Monday 01 March 2010 21:07:18 Dale wrote:
And to think I have been in KDE 4 for almost a week now. Maybe this is
to soon to remove KDE 3?
To be fair, amarok is not part of KDE-4, it's a third party add-on to the
On Monday 01 March 2010 19:22:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 01 March 2010 21:07:18 Dale wrote:
And to think I have been in KDE 4 for almost a week now. Maybe this is
to soon to remove KDE 3?
To be fair, amarok is not part of KDE-4, it's a third party add-on to the
KDE framework. Not
On Monday 01 March 2010 16:08:05 Alex Schuster wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
[KDE4 problems]
And so on. But it's not so bad I cannot work with it (well, sometimes
it is, and then I have to fix it, like when the password dialog no
longer accepted passwords), and so I keep using it,
On 01/03/10 16:39, Lie Ryan wrote:
I've found a few people referencing to a 30-day stabilization policy
which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be
considered for stabilization, but is there any document that serves as
an official guideline/checklist on how to consider to
On Monday 01 March 2010 22:19:45 Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-03-01 1:26 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf
Also - why /var/lib/layman, and not /var/lib/portage/layman? It looks a
little odd just dumped in there all by itself.
Becuase layman is not part of
Hi,
I've been trying to get an nvidia controller working today and not
having much luck. It's complaining about failing to load kernel
module.
As a starting point I'm following this guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
My nvidia device is (I think) a GeForce 6 family
On Monday 01 March 2010 22:28:42 Mick wrote:
My pet peeve is Desktop. I have two monitors at work and use two X
screens. KDE wants to create a Desktop and a Desktop-1 directory. I want
it to just
use the same set of files for both - background, icons, plasma widgets
must be the same
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 00:04:08 Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get an nvidia controller working today and not
having much luck. It's complaining about failing to load kernel
module.
As a starting point I'm following this guide:
Mark Knecht wrote:
and from this nVidia page seems to be supported by the 173.xx series drivers:
Yes, but I don't think they are compatible with the 2.6.33 kernel. There
was a
patch for the 190.53 driver released yesterday to make it work with
2.6.33. Try
that.
Be lucky,
Neil
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get an nvidia controller working today and not
having much luck. It's complaining about failing to load kernel
module.
As a starting point I'm following this guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
My nvidia device is (I
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to get an nvidia controller working today and not
having much luck. It's complaining about failing to load kernel
module.
SNIP
SOLVED:
Mar 1 14:36:49 dragonfly kernel: NVRM: This PCI I/O region
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
Or you can edit /var/lib/layman/make.conf and change the locations
there.
That didn't work for me; the current layman script still references the
old location; which is why I added the soft link.
You have to set the location in
On Monday 01 March 2010 21:17:23 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 01 March 2010 22:28:42 Mick wrote:
My pet peeve is Desktop. I have two monitors at work and use two X
screens. KDE wants to create a Desktop and a Desktop-1 directory. I
want it to just
use the same set of files for
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 01:17:06 Mick wrote:
Thanks Alan, your insight in this is much appreciated. I've been trying
different things and keep coming back to fluxbox. Having spent time some
years ago to set it up just-as-I-want-it in terms of the menu with all my
apps, as well as the
This article was a big surprise to me. Am I the last one to hear about this
stuff?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10461670-16.html?part=rssamp;subj=newsamp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20
Am Freitag 26 Februar 2010 schrieb Paul Hartman:
Hi, I'm building a new personal computer. I respect the opinion and
experience of the people on this list and am interested in anyone's
advice on the best way to set up my new Gentoo installation. Things
that you say I wish I set mine up this
On Monday 01 March 2010 10:11:18 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:08:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
We just log the fact of running sudo. The admins are trusted to not
cock things up, and if they do, to not try and hide it. The philosophy
is simple - if we feel we can't trust you,
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 08:33:07 Mick wrote:
On Monday 01 March 2010 10:11:18 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:08:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
We just log the fact of running sudo. The admins are trusted to not
cock things up, and if they do, to not try and hide it. The
51 matches
Mail list logo
