On Monday 01 March 2010 19:22:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Monday 01 March 2010 21:07:18 Dale wrote: > > And to think I have been in KDE 4 for almost a week now. Maybe this is > > to soon to remove KDE 3? > > To be fair, amarok is not part of KDE-4, it's a third party add-on to the > KDE framework. Not much the KDE devs can do about that except encourage > the Amarok devs to ship quality tested code. > > Sort of like AdBlock - if it were poor quality it would not be a correct > reflection on Mozilla as a whole > > > My pet peeve so far is the background slide show. Every time I log in, > > try to change a setting for the background, or sneeze the wrong way, it > > starts looking for the new images, even tho there may not be any. I > > have a huge amount of them and it takes almost 2 minutes to "rebuild" > > whatever it is building. While it is doing that, it won't do anything > > else. > > > > I'm hoping this will change sometime soon. Oh, I also don't like that > > the images are random. Most of my images are done as a slide show. > > Having them in random order sort of defeats the point. > > My pet peeve is Desktop. I have two monitors at work and use two X screens. > KDE wants to create a Desktop and a Desktop-1 directory. I want it to just > use the same set of files for both - background, icons, plasma widgets > must be the same on both monitors, but actual app windows running there > independent. This seems perfectly reasonable to me - e17 does it out the > box - but thus far I have not found the magic voodoo spell that makes it > happen.
How does e17 compare in terms of resources to other WMs/DEs like *box, LXDE, xface, these days? I had a look at it when it was all the rage back when, but it looked too Gnomey to me at the time and I couldn't find a reason for preferring it over say fluxbox. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
