This is of interest to those of us running old versions of Flash,
especially on 64-bit installs without 32-bit support (looks in
mirrorg).
Download site is http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
To find out where to install, go to about:plugins in Firefox, and see
where your
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons
(xmarks, AdBlockPlus, Noscript, Stumble-upon) without it crashing.
Seg fault sometimes. I've got
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I cannot install my 4 add-ons
(xmarks,
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
I got myself up to the latest, and I
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010, Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I wonder whether this
On 09/18/2010 05:45 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I wonder whether this is expected behavior.
The following statistics have been
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010, Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 07:45 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Lie Ryan
did opine thusly:
On 09/19/10 09:22, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 18 September 2010 15:14, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting,
On 09/19/2010 12:15 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/19/2010 12:15 PM, Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:54 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian
Philipp did opine thusly:
Hi list!
I have a bit of a
On 09/19/2010 01:12 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:54 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Nikos
Chantziaras did opine thusly:
On 09/19/2010 11:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian
Philipp did opine
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If your system is slow maybe from managing all that unusued memory. ;-)
Al
Al wrote:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If your system is slow maybe from managing all that unusued memory. ;-)
Al
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:37 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Al did
opine thusly:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3754 3588 165 0 57 258
3588 of 3754 is free, AFAIK not used at all. Plug off 3500 and sell it.
If
Alan McKinnon writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian Philipp did opine thusly:
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats memory for
breakfast. Directly after booting, everything is okay but the usage
grows significantly. I
Am 18.09.2010 22:19, schrieb Alex Schuster:
[...]
I used to restart kdm once per day in order to free memory. If I did not
do this, KDE4 became nearly unsusabe.
Yeah, logout - logon seems to resolve my problem temporarily, as well.
Now this looks different here. I have X with 946M,
Am 19.09.2010 13:34, schrieb Alex Schuster:
Alan McKinnon writes:
Like I posted in another thread today, the memory columns in top do not
mean what most people think they mean, nor are they simplistic.
You gave the example of Thunderbird using 150M and Firefox 180M, but
together they would
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:34 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Alex
Schuster did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:45 on Saturday 18 September 2010,
Florian Philipp did opine thusly:
I have a bit of a problem. I'm on KDE-4.4.5 and it eats
Am 19.09.2010 10:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
[...]
Like I posted in another thread today, the memory columns in top do not mean
what most people think they mean, nor are they simplistic.
The columns tell you the amount of memory that process can access. This is
vitally important to
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 09:06:25 Petric Frank wrote:
Hello Mick,
Am Montag, 13. September 2010, 23:09:03 schrieb Mick:
Konqueror won't even go as far as that. It only shows:
I [13/Sep/2010:22:04:57 +0100] [Job ???] Request file type is
application/pdf.
In case of priting with
I have tried changing resources in systemsettings to akonadi directory,
instead of .kde4/share/apps/kabc/std.vcf, but still cannot see any contacts.
When entering an address in a new message To: field, the address book seems to
be used because autocompletion works.
This is happening on both an
On Saturday 18 September 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
Okay, I'm used to Firefox taking much memory. I'm okay with that since
it's the most heavily used application currently running. But why does
Akregator need that much memory? It doesn't even have any tabs open at
the moment and is just
Hi all,
I'm not a mysql guru but what that bastard is doing it's drive me crazy.
version:5.1.50-r1 installed from portage
So...
I have installed and working fine.
I have installed phpmyadmin too and it's working fine. I can log in... :)
I wanted to create a database but after I gave the
On 09/19/2010 08:05 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
This is of interest to those of us running old versions of Flash,
especially on 64-bit installs without 32-bit support (looks in
mirrorg).
Download site is http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
To find out where to install, go to
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [10-09-18 18:00]:
On Saturday 18 September 2010 04:44:35 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
KEYMAP=qwertz/de-latin1-nodeadkeys
Try changing this to:
KEYMAP=de-latin1-nodeadkeys
--
Regards,
Mick
Unfortunately, this give me an QWERTY-keyboard layout (default).
On Sunday 19 September 2010 16:06:06 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [10-09-18 18:00]:
On Saturday 18 September 2010 04:44:35 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
KEYMAP=qwertz/de-latin1-nodeadkeys
Try changing this to:
KEYMAP=de-latin1-nodeadkeys
Unfortunately,
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [10-09-19 18:02]:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 16:06:06 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [10-09-18 18:00]:
On Saturday 18 September 2010 04:44:35 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
KEYMAP=qwertz/de-latin1-nodeadkeys
Try changing this
Actually, the 3588 is what is used. The 165 is what is free. Maybe the
email program you are using is not lining the columns up properly.
Maybe you are right. Headers out of alignment.
Al
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:02 AM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.comwrote:
On 19 September 2010 10:09, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:28 on Sunday 19 September 2010, András
Csányi did opine thusly:
On 19 September 2010 00:14, Kevin
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 18:23 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
[...]
Verifying ebuild manifests
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/kde-base/ark/files/ark-4.4.5-cli7zip.patch
!!! Reason: Failed on RMD160
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or does Firefox get slower every release? And less
stable.
ok first of .. i dont run my comp (laptop) for that long, although i am
planning to start using hibernate. its usually up the whole day though.
secondly im on kde4.5.1 (but i dont remeber having such bad memory problems
with the version your running).
Krunner's neopomuk plugin leaks memory,
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Is it just me? Or
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried Chrome
once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up on it
because I was not sure if the browser was calling home with my browsing
On 09/19/10 19:26, András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
Chrome
once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I gave up
on it
because I was not sure if the
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco Talamona
francesco.talam...@know.eu wrote:
On
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:02 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Mark Knecht
did opine thusly:
In a related way I've never stopped to look at /usr in the process of
doing an install. I have an old Mac Mini that I've been trying to get
Gentoo running on recently so in the middle of my
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:32 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Kevin
O'Gorman did opine thusly:
Yeah, me too. I teach at a university and classes start tomorrow. I've had
the fox not starting as someone else did, then on upgrade it was sort of
working, then not. The last bug I submitted
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:02 on Sunday 19 September 2010, Mark Knecht
did opine thusly:
In a related way I've never stopped to look at /usr in the process of
doing an install. I have an old Mac Mini that
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:56:36 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:07:11 me wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel da Veiga
danieldave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:21, Francesco
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:05:51 -0400
Walter Dnes wrote:
This is of interest to those of us running old versions of Flash,
especially on 64-bit installs without 32-bit support (looks in
mirrorg).
Download site is http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
To find out where to
On Sunday 19 September 2010 18:26:56 András Csányi wrote:
On 19 September 2010 19:18, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Opera is faster than FF for sure both on my amd64 and my x86. I tried
Chrome once (early days then) and I couldn't tell if it was faster. I
gave up on it because I
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 16:02 +0200, András Csányi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not a mysql guru but what that bastard is doing it's drive me crazy.
version:5.1.50-r1 installed from portage
So...
I have installed and working fine.
I have installed phpmyadmin too and it's working fine. I can log
Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
deleted. However a number of packages require this file and now I can't
emerge any version of dbus with static-libs -- seems they have
hard-coded it away. What the heck is going on?
Any assistance would be appreciated.
--
Your
On 09/20/10 02:33, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
deleted. However a number of packages require this file and now I
can't emerge any version of dbus with static-libs -- seems they
have hard-coded it away. What the heck is going on?
a...@sourcegarden.de a...@sourcegarden.de wrote:
On 09/20/10 02:33, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi all. During a system update today, /usr/lib/libdbus-1.la was
deleted. However a number of packages require this file and now I
can't emerge any version of dbus with static-libs -- seems
maybe you need the old-daemons use flag?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Kyle Bader kyle.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
net-wireless/bluez maybe?
Kyle
On Sep 16, 2010 1:01 PM, Hung Dang hungp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to use hid2hci for my bluetooth keyboad. However, I could not
51 matches
Mail list logo
