next box tested.
Installed systemd on my main workstation now that I understood how to
easily flip back to booting w/ openrc in case of problems.
I heavily use LVM here and this gives me the following issues:
I use lvm.service from the gentoo-wiki:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#LVM
2011-08-19 14:54 keltezéssel, Nikos Chantziaras írta:
On 08/19/2011 03:02 PM, Space Cake wrote:
hi,
after playing a lot with desktop environment first I've decided to move
from kde to gnome because kde is too shine and eat too much and
contains a lot of feature which I don't really need..
Am 22.08.2011 10:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
What I wonder: what changes between running into that timeout and my
pressing Ctrl-D?
To me it seems that the underlying RAID-device (which is the PV inside
the LVM-VG) isn't up fast enough.
Trying to figure it out now.
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:54:48 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 22.08.2011 10:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
What I wonder: what changes between running into that timeout and my
pressing Ctrl-D?
To me it seems that the underlying RAID-device (which is the PV inside
the LVM-VG)
Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
Are they actually started in the right order?
In other words, first RAID, then LVM?
I don't know ;-)
I still try to understand all this.
There is no specific RAID-service-file, so it seems to be done by udev
and the related target/service somehow.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:47:02 +0200, Space Cake wrote:
So, what if I have changed the flags to -kde and -gnome, and I also ran
depclean, also used the script provided by some kind member of the list
and I still have all the kde gnome stuff on my system? Do I need some
list of packages should I
2011/8/22 Space Cake spaceca...@gmail.com:
2011-08-19 14:54 keltezéssel, Nikos Chantziaras írta:
On 08/19/2011 03:02 PM, Space Cake wrote:
hi,
after playing a lot with desktop environment first I've decided to move
from kde to gnome because kde is too shine and eat too much and
contains a
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:31:19 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
Are they actually started in the right order?
In other words, first RAID, then LVM?
I don't know ;-)
I still try to understand all this.
There is no specific
On Sunday 21 August 2011 20.26:40 Dan Johansson wrote:
Hi,
I need some help with writing udev-rules for capi.
After playing around some I decided to ask for help here as can't really
get it to work.
What I want ist the following:
/dev/capi20 68,0
/dev/capi/capi# 191,#
68,0 = Major
Am 21.08.2011 12:24, schrieb Leonardo Guilherme:
2011/8/21 Maximilian Bräutigammax.braeuti...@googlemail.com:
Hello all,
I recently bought a Zotac Barebone ZBOX HD-AD02 AMD E-350 and installed
Gentoo on it, what is working more or less very well except the sound. I
did everything according to
Am 21.08.2011 12:57, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 04:48:49 schrieb Dale:
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hello all,
I recently bought a Zotac Barebone ZBOX HD-AD02 AMD E-350 and installed
Gentoo on it, what is working more or less very well except the sound. I
did
Any preferred SIP softphone on Gentoo? I've used Ekiga on Windows and
Ubuntu, and it's only moderately painful there, but it's very, very,
very old on Gentoo.
If there are no good options, I'll stick with the SIP client on my
android phone, for now. (hardphone isn't an option)
--
:wq
Im using xlite on my gentoo workstation and have no trouble with it.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kai Zemke
**
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:03:02 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
Any preferred SIP softphone on Gentoo? I've used Ekiga on Windows and
Ubuntu, and it's only moderately painful there, but it's very, very,
very old on Gentoo.
Ekiga 3.2.7 is the latest on their web site and it has been in portage
for just
2011/8/21 Maximilian Bräutigam max.braeuti...@googlemail.com:
Is is possible that ff and chromium are sending data to HDMI since it is
card 0? If you think, it would be helpful to disable card 0 or change
the order, please tell me how to do it?
Either make udev rules to create the devices in
Am 2011-08-22 13:42, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean
up when it fails.
Hm, yes, I understand.
What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely on a module
that is loaded in the background? In which case you could try adding
Hi all,
I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ... there's no more FF5?
Would it be possible to support FF5 a bit longer? The devs at FF may
have gone a bit bananas but
On Monday, August 22, 2011 06:55:21 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 2011-08-22 13:42, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean
up when it fails.
Hm, yes, I understand.
What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely on a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I found it surprisingly painless. Note, I went through most of these
steps with X *NOT* running; I switched to a terminal and stopped kdm
before really going past step 2.
One additional note. Except for time spent compiling,
On 22 August 2011 09:58, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Or is there a way to tell Portage to ignore upgrades but not downgrade FF?
I installed the FF5 ebuild in my overlay. That seems to work fine.
Am 22.08.2011 18:58, schrieb Hilco Wijbenga:
Hi all,
I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ... there's no more FF5?
Would it be possible to support FF5 a bit longer?
On 22 August 2011 10:29, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 22.08.2011 18:58, schrieb Hilco Wijbenga:
Hi all,
I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ...
Am 22.08.2011 19:03, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
I do hope you can figure this one out as I do like the idea of systemd. But I
need RAID and LVM to work correctly for my system to boot.
Got it.
Compared this one:
https://github.com/falconindy/initscripts-systemd/blob/master/lvm.service
w/ the
Am 22.08.2011 20:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
The line:
Requires=udev-settle.service
missed, I added it and now it boots up straight and fast.
update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
S
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to use distcc to make the desktop do all the compiling during
emerges. I've never been able to get distcc working properly, or, at
least, I've never been able to get it working to the point where using
Hi. I have heard thet there are drivers for mono to work with unixodbc,
but can't figure out which package if any, I should emerge to get that
functionality.
Anyone know how to do this?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The
Hi,
according to http://www.mono-project.com/ODBC the System.Data should
contain everything you need (aside from odbc, that is)
So you'll need dev-lang/mono (and dev-db/unixODBC or dev-db/libiodbc for odbc)
But - are you sure you'll want to do this? Odbc - really?
Yours,
Nils
2011/8/22
victor romanchuk writes:
i had noticed that distcc is peevish about CFLAGS: these should be
compatible on both client and server. in my case i made these
similar on both machines (laptop is core2duo and desktop is
core2quad; both are running amd64 arch)
I don't think this is true -
Thanks, I may need it because I am using freeswitch, but I need to
investigate further.
Nils Andresen n...@nils-andresen.de wrote:
Hi,
according to http://www.mono-project.com/ODBC the System.Data should
contain everything you need (aside from odbc, that is)
So you'll need dev-lang/mono (and
Hi all,
I hope some Apache guru can help me out. I must be missing something
very obvious.
Assume a default Apache 2.2.17 with all modules installed and -D PROXY
-D INFO in /etc/conf.d/apache2.
My update to the default VHOST:
ForensicLog /var/log/apache2/forensic.log
ProxyRequests
Am 22.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
replying to myself once more, which makes it feel more like a wiki or
blog than a mailing-list ;-)
additional thoughts:
* as there is readahead-support in systemd I assume I could get rid of
Hi all,
Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics from gentoo
machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are welcome.
To submit your stats, use the app-portage/gentoostats ebuild from betagarden
overlay[1].
[0]
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
RewriteRule ^/website$ http://localhost/website/ [T]
ProxyPassMatch ^/website/(.*)$
http://localhost:8000/website/$1
/VirtualHost
The ProxyPassMatch fires but (AFAICT) the RewriteRule does not. I.e.
On 22 August 2011 14:31, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
RewriteRule ^/website$ http://localhost/website/ [T]
ProxyPassMatch ^/website/(.*)$
http://localhost:8000/website/$1
/VirtualHost
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
should be no problem.
CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
behavior and the binary code generation produced by compiler. in my case
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
should be no problem.
CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
behavior and the binary code generation produced by compiler. in my case
36 matches
Mail list logo
