On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:46:29 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 15 Nov 2011 21:36:14 Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 15.11.2011 20:39, schrieb Mick:
Thankfully this didn't happen on my machine, but I have to fix
this all the same ...
Is it possible to press F5 (the
Greetings
normally using i686 i am discovering now the world of x86_64 on an extra
partition under Intel Core i5. Some astounding differences, but i will
manage.
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the information, that
there is no /usr/portage/packages. And indeed, so it is. How to
When I need to mount a removable USB device on LXDE (~amd64) I currently
manually issue the mount command. What do I need to do to make
automounting possible?
According to LXDE wiki (1) you need HAL, which I don't have on my
system. I found several suggestions on the net but none seems promising.
On Nov 17, 2011 4:07 PM, Hartmut Figge h.fi...@gmx.de wrote:
Greetings
normally using i686 i am discovering now the world of x86_64 on an extra
partition under Intel Core i5. Some astounding differences, but i will
manage.
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the information, that
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:03:52 +0100
Hartmut Figge h.fi...@gmx.de wrote:
Greetings
normally using i686 i am discovering now the world of x86_64 on an
extra partition under Intel Core i5. Some astounding differences, but
i will manage.
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Greetings
normally using i686 i am discovering now the world of x86_64 on an extra
partition under Intel Core i5. Some astounding differences, but i will
manage.
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the information, that
there is no /usr/portage/packages. And
Pandu Poluan:
On Nov 17, 2011 4:07 PM, Hartmut Figge h.fi...@gmx.de wrote:
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the information, that
there is no /usr/portage/packages. And indeed, so it is. How to get this
directory and how to fill it? :)
That directory *is* normally empty, unless
Dale:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Now i run 'eclean -p packages' which leads to the information, that
there is no /usr/portage/packages. And indeed, so it is. How to get this
directory and how to fill it? :)
Here you go:
buildpkg
Binary packages will be created for all packages that are merged.
Am 17.11.2011 07:50, schrieb Dale:
[...]
One more question. I have two drives. A 250Gb and a 750Gb. Originally
the data was on the 750Gb drive. I set the 250Gb up on LVM then moved
things over from the 750Gb. I then added the 750Gb to the VG and
resized the file system. So, in theory the
On 17 November 2011 08:56, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for dropping kdepim. I used to love kaddressbook and kontact (but a
lot of that was enthusiasm about features that were just around the
corner). I found that I was having consistent problems keeping my
contacts between
On 17 November 2011 09:07, Raffaele BELARDI raffaele.bela...@st.com wrote:
When I need to mount a removable USB device on LXDE (~amd64) I currently
manually issue the mount command. What do I need to do to make
automounting possible?
According to LXDE wiki (1) you need HAL, which I don't have
On Nov 17, 2011 4:51 PM, James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 November 2011 09:07, Raffaele BELARDI raffaele.bela...@st.com
wrote:
When I need to mount a removable USB device on LXDE (~amd64) I currently
manually issue the mount command. What do I need to do to make
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:17:23 -0600, Dale wrote:
FEATURES=buildpkg sandbox parallel-fetch --keep-going
Shouldn't --keep-going be in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS?
--
Neil Bothwick
Vuja De: the feeling that you've never been here before.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:07:11 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
When I need to mount a removable USB device on LXDE (~amd64) I currently
manually issue the mount command. What do I need to do to make
automounting possible?
The simplest option is to emerge uam.
--
Neil Bothwick
Will the last
Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
compile times, it's almost like using a binary distro.
Wow, sounds
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 19:05, schrieb masterprometheus:
Oh I would definitly do that (overclock it I mean). But if there
isn't someone with the same name, you've said :
I ask myself if I need the K-version at all, I don't want to
overclock ...
Change of heart ?
On 11/17/2011 11:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:07:11 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
When I need to mount a removable USB device on LXDE (~amd64) I currently
manually issue the mount command. What do I need to do to make
automounting possible?
The simplest option is to
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:43:28 AM Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 17.11.2011 07:50, schrieb Dale:
[...]
One more question. I have two drives. A 250Gb and a 750Gb. Originally
the data was on the 750Gb drive. I set the 250Gb up on LVM then moved
things over from the 750Gb. I then
On 11/15/2011 10:55 AM, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
I'll answer myself: just pass the option.
And when happy, put them in the config file:
daniel@moja ~ $ grep threads .mplayer/config
lavdopts=threads=4
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-789673-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-75.html
On
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:22:35 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
1. udev rules: mounts automatically, with pmount can do non-root
un-mounting 2. mdev: according to the man page works only at system boot
3. uam: does not require fiddling with udev rules but cannot un-mount
I suppose I'll go with
On 11/17/2011 03:06 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:22:35 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
3. uam: does not require fiddling with udev rules but cannot
un-mount
3 is wrong, you can unmount with pmount, exactly the same as with
1.
uam is basically a set of udev rules that
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:58:03 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
The ArchWiki link on Udev posted by James shows how to set a rule for
un-mounting:
ACTION==remove, ENV{dir_name}!=, RUN+=/bin/su tomk -c
'/usr/bin/pumount /media/%E{dir_name}'
Based on your feedback I suppose the same can be
Hi,
I've got a 3-disk 250GB RAID-1 that I use for short term, on the
machine backups. It's normally not mounted unless I'm doing a quick
save. Unfortunately it's a bit too small these days so I'm therefore
going to convert it to a 3-disk RAID-5 which will double it's size.
I'm pretty sure
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:01:46 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've got the command set right to do the RAID-1 to
RAID-5 conversion, but once it's done I believe the file system itself
will still be 250GB so I'll need to resize the file system. In the
past I've done this with
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:43:28 AM Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 17.11.2011 07:50, schrieb Dale:
[...]
One more question. I have two drives. A 250Gb and a 750Gb. Originally
the data was on the 750Gb drive. I set the 250Gb up on LVM then moved
things over from
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:01:46 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've got the command set right to do the RAID-1 to
RAID-5 conversion, but once it's done I believe the file system itself
will still be 250GB so
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:01:46 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've got the command set right to do the RAID-1 to
RAID-5 conversion, but once it's done I believe the file system itself
will still be 250GB so
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:01:46 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've got the command set right to do the RAID-1 to
RAID-5 conversion, but
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:37:59 -0600, Dale wrote:
Also, this will only work if the VG has sufficient unused space (eg.
not used by LVs) on the other disk(s) to accomodate the data moved.
Thanks. Clear as mud now. lol I'm getting there. Is there a tool
to see if there is enough room to
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
At this point I was told:
Now, resize your filesystem to use the additional space.
So, if at this point the end-block of sda6 isn't 976768064
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
At this point I was told:
Now, resize your filesystem to use the
Willie Wong wwong at math.princeton.edu writes:
It makes gcc-4.5.3 use a newer method to detect parallelism, thus
(potentially) makes programs compiled by gcc to have better multithreaded
performance.
Now, why can't the USE descriptions be like the kernel option
descriptions and have
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Ok, I thought you had it clear how you were going to resize the raid,
and needed help resizing the filesystem that already existed on top of
the
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:59:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, resize would be done to /dev/md?. I agree. However I don't
believe that I'd use Neil's suggestion of fdisk block numbers on
/dev/md, right? That doesn't make sense to me and I don't beleieve
Neil was suggesting anything like that.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Ok, I thought you had it clear how you were going to resize the raid,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:17:23 -0600, Dale wrote:
FEATURES=buildpkg sandbox parallel-fetch --keep-going
Shouldn't --keep-going be in EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS?
It should and it was. I must have pasted it from somewhere and not
noticed it. No need in it being in both places
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:59:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, resize would be done to /dev/md?. I agree. However I don't
believe that I'd use Neil's suggestion of fdisk block numbers on
/dev/md, right? That doesn't make
On Thursday 17 Nov 2011 09:44:35 James Broadhead wrote:
On 17 November 2011 08:56, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for dropping kdepim. I used to love kaddressbook and kontact (but a
lot of that was enthusiasm about features that were just around the
corner). I found that I
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:01:44 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not manually edit anything on the addressbook in question (and
the user in question would not know how to do that). I am told that
she just pressed the F5 button and bang! All contacts gone in an
instant! To me
Am 2011-11-17 11:44, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2011-11-17 02:27, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:33:24 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I think i7-2600k is the sweet spot right now.
It's working nicely for me. I can't believe the difference in
compile times, it's
You are correct, the internal card reader was the problem, I tried today in
a Dell Vostro running ubuntu, and everything worked nice, even tried in
another Dell laptop with windows, and the card was recognized as well. It
seems the problem is indeed my hardware, so I'm buying a usb card reader to
Hi,
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to embed
gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Érico V. Porto
Érico Porto wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to embed
gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Érico V. Porto
Someone put Gentoo on a guitar once. Think I'm kidding right?
http://www.gentoo.org/news/20100125-misa-guitar-interview.xml
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:34:14 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, so returning to your original response, you suggest increasing the
size of each physical partition and then resizing each of the physical
partitions independently? (/dev/sdwhatever instead of /dev/md6
directly?)
Is there a reason
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:31 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Right now I have everything built with rather CPU-specific CFLAGS.
Specific L1/L2-cache-sizes and stuff, set after doing something like
gcc -Q --help=target -march=native (gentoo wiki).
I wonder if this
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:34:14 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, so returning to your original response, you suggest increasing the
size of each physical partition and then resizing each of the physical
partitions
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:09 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Do you have separately partitioned drives with those partitions
arranged into single-partition arrays, or do you have one RAID device
that is then partitioned?
If the latter, you should certainly work with the md device.
I
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:13:09 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Do you have separately partitioned drives with those partitions
arranged into single-partition arrays, or do you have one RAID device
that is then partitioned?
Érico Porto ericoporto2008 at gmail.com writes:
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to
embed gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Yes, on lots of arch's all sorts of small file systems.
You should post to the list gentoo-embedded.
SH, ppc, arm, mips
On Nov 18, 2011 6:54 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Érico Porto wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to embed
gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Érico V. Porto
Someone put Gentoo on a guitar once. Think I'm kidding right?
Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011 6:54 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Érico Porto wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to
embed gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Érico V. Porto
Someone put
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:37:59 -0600, Dale wrote:
Also, this will only work if the VG has sufficient unused space (eg.
not used by LVs) on the other disk(s) to accomodate the data moved.
Thanks. Clear as mud now. lol I'm getting there. Is there a tool
to see if there
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:51:55 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Érico Porto wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone here ever tried to build a really small filesystem to
embed gentoo into some non x86 hardware? Pure curiosity.
Érico V. Porto
Someone put Gentoo on a guitar once. Think I'm
i had installed CUPS-1.4.3 from source(configure, make, make install)
now i can configure print via localhost:631, and the test page is perfect.
but the problem is, why can't i see the print in programs ? (etc. in
firefox, file-print, there is no print in print dialog)
thanks all
--
Good
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:41 AM, 俞强 qiangl...@gmail.com wrote:
i had installed CUPS-1.4.3 from source(configure, make, make install)
now i can configure print via localhost:631, and the test page is perfect.
but the problem is, why can't i see the print in programs ? (etc. in
firefox,
On 11/17/2011 04:54 P, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I thought that pcmanfm, the LXDE file manager, had a context menu
option to unmount.
Me too, and I think that a long time ago I did have it, but now it's
not there. Probably I'd better try on the lxde mailing list.
thanks,
raf
56 matches
Mail list logo
