RE: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader

2007-07-19 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, but what I _don't_ like is when

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-19 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:00 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? I totally agree here. (Of course, I think the Free Software vs. Proprietary Software war is just

RE: [gentoo-user] [OT] English sucks (was: Re: Installation problems)

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hendrik Boom Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:35 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] [OT] English sucks (was: Re: Installation problems) On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:44:32 +0100, Mike

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Stroller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:59 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? Routers: The router issue was probably missed by a number of people simply because in the states it is

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:42 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? If you don't like the GPLv3, you probably didn't *really* like the GPLv2 and might be more

RE: [gentoo-user] ADSL network

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: sain yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:11 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] ADSL network Hi My box can`t link to internet , I using rp-pppoe I think it work fine, when run pppoe-start I get internet

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: b.n. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:29 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? Personally I'm quite happy with both GPLv2 and GPLv3. Frankly, my only real, serious concern is the fact that

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henk Boom Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:08 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? On 16/07/07, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: because gplv3

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Abraham Marín Pérez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:43 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:19 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? On Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007, Stroller wrote: I believe that even Linus - who is noted for

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:20 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? On Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:27 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? More than that -- they don't allow the compromised devices to boot. Of course, that's

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Mike Edenfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:30 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? I'm not sure why that seems to be such a problem for GPL proponents to admit. It's perfectly

[gentoo-user] The Gentoo-User mailing list

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
Who would I contact with suggestions or concerns about the mailing list?

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regis Decamps Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:03 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question Florian Philipp wrote: Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 02:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

RE: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-08 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Hemmann, Volker Armin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:19 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Aleksey Kunitskiy wrote: Hi all,

RE: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-08 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:48 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition On Friday 08 June 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Freitag, 8.

RE: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:00 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Second: Bug

RE: [gentoo-user] Install Using another System

2007-06-05 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 5:53 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Install Using another System Am Montag 04 Juni 2007 23:28 schrieb darren kirby: quoth the Randy Barlow: One

RE: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-05 Thread burlingk
Ok, my two cents on the matter. I am still new enough to the community to be considered an outsider, so here is an outsider's perspective. I hope not to step on toes, but it will probably happen anyway. First: Cosmetic things, i.e. user interface issues, pretty pictures, and things that

RE: [gentoo-user] Problem with yelp while doing --update world

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Renat Golubchyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 6:33 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with yelp while doing --update world On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:38:07 -0400 John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [gentoo-user] Help me reboot X

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Kevin O'Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:17 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Help me reboot X Can somebody help me stop and restart X? I'm using kdm for login. -- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD --

RE: [gentoo-user] Japanese Support

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: PaulNM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 1:41 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Japanese Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a howto for Japanese support in Gentoo? How about

[gentoo-user] Japanese Support

2007-06-02 Thread burlingk
Is there a howto for Japanese support in Gentoo?

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 Ali Polatel wrote: You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Ali Polatel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:46 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış: snip I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.

RE: [gentoo-user] Shutdown -h now is not powering down system.

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Richard Marz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:40 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Shutdown -h now is not powering down system. No. But, I will try it now. I'll let you know if it works in a few

RE: [gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Galevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:21 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question Hi, you can learn the xml concepts at http://www.w3schools.com/. Then, depending on the language

RE: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for the following packages are either all masked or don't exist

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:37 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for the following packages are either all masked or don't exist Calculating world dependencies - !!! Ebuilds

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Test!

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Ryan Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:40 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Test! On 5/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: dark85x

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Test!

2007-05-28 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: dark85x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:06 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Test! On Monday 28 May 2007 19:04:16 Tobias Heinlein wrote: Hi there! eMails rock! irc email -- [EMAIL

[gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question

2007-05-28 Thread burlingk
Are there any really good XML tutorials on the web, or perhaps a book that is actually useful? Also, which libs do people preffer for dealing with XML? I am contemplating messing arround with XML for data files for a project I want to mess with. The project would involve loading objects into

RE: [gentoo-user] no audio

2007-05-27 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: maxim wexler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 10:09 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] no audio Hi group, For a 2.6.19.5 kernel on a PIII w/SBLive soundcard using snd-emu10k1 module. I emerged alsa-utils

[gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
Due to issues with some of the software I am wanting to run, when it is run under the AMD64 bit version of Gentoo (one of which is Blender, which I hope will be properly stable soon), I am planning to run x86 Gentoo (With the i686 stage3) on an AMD64 processor. My question is this, If I enabel

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:07 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. On Friday 25 May 2007 02:12:49 [EMAIL

RE: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Randy Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:23 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf? Snip If you are using a lot of memory in your

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:28 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. On Friday 25 May 2007 04:09:00 [EMAIL

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Denis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:32 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel, and a 32

RE: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:20 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries Hi! I've already asked this question on gentoo-user-de but I've got no - let's say -

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Peter Alfredsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:55 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. On Friday 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: [gentoo-user] portage lags behind?

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: b.n. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 6:28 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage lags behind? maxim wexler ha scritto: How do I tell portage to go for the latest stable pkg without having to

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Hemmann, Volker Armin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:34 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, Here goes...

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Hemmann, Volker Armin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:02 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question snip That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:27 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:13:11 +0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip The next

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
That won't work, portage will complain that there is a problem with our world file and bail out. Ah, thanks. I didn't realize emerge was unhappy with packages in world which are not already installed. Put the packages you want in a file like world then do emerge -ef $(cat

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:27 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question Not to mention you will spend much longer waiting for everything to download then

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Hemmann, Volker Armin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:58 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dale wrote: Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:

[gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
Ok, Here goes... How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a full copy of the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles directory of the average server? Would it be possible to draw down the whole archive all in one shot using wget or similar, dump it all

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:30 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 13:06 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, Here goes...

[gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
If I use emerge -f on a package, will it fetch that packaged dependencies as well? For instance, if I use 'emerge -f xorg-x11', will it check the system, then download everything that it needs to install that package? If I were to use 'emerge -uf world', would there be a huge number of packaged

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Naga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:02 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question snip According to some devs on -dev (IRC) last night about 50 GiB if you want _all_

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:26 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I use emerge -f on a package, will it fetch that packaged dependencies as well?

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ?

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Walter Dnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 3:33 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ? On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:42:22AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote If a person does not wish to

RE: [solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Xinerama on 945GM: Set VBE mode failed

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Gian Domeni Calgeer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:41 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Xinerama on 945GM: Set VBE mode failed snip Thanks for the suggestion, but if I remove them it says

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
Enrico Weigelt wrote: The circular dependencies between Xserver and drivers do not come from upstream. They're artificial. If we just want an simple-to-use package which gets the Xserver *and* drivers based on useflags (which IMHO is an good idea), it's quite trivial to do this by an

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 7:02 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ?

2007-05-18 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Philip Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 4:26 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ? snip Once you get used to it, you'll probably like Gentoo: most people do. Those who leave usually

RE: [gentoo-user] Can't start apache [solved]

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:21 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't start apache [solved] On Thursday 17 May 2007, Johannes Skov Frandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: [gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of circular dependencies

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:52 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of circular dependencies On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:18:40 +0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: Hemmann, Volker Armin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:22 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs] On Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2007,

[gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of circular dependencies

2007-05-16 Thread burlingk
My only input at this time (since I am a total newb when it comes to Gentoo), is this. I had an issue with circular dependencies, but it was because I did not understand the intricacies of use flags at the time. Now that I understand better, the only problem I seem to run into is trying to get

[gentoo-user] Getting Started

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
I am new to Gentoo, and working on getting things up and going. I am running an HP Pavilion with an Athlon 64 processor. I'll build a desktop eventually when I have the time, but for now this is it. I am attempting to install the x86 version of Gentoo from the i686 stage3 tarball, and so far

RE: [gentoo-user] Getting Started

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Do you have any advice for making sure that the Xorg install is successful? Seems to always die during the compile process for the ati driver. ^^;; -Original Message- From: Vladimir Rusinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 4:21 PM

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If the tests are failing, then perhaps they are needed even more. Also, if you are building from a stage1, you are not dealing with non-dev builds at all. ^^;; -Original Message- From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:27 PM To: gentoo-user Subject:

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If you have an active internet environment, use the knopix disk to download an iso for one of the live CD's, such as the actual liveCD or the minimal CD, and then burn to disk, and get the stage3 tarball. Or, if you are on a different machine now, use the machine you are on now to get the ISO if

[gentoo-user] A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Is there a way to select a list option so that I can get a plain text digest? The regular list traffic produces way too many messages, but I cannot read the digest version on my mail system because it sends it as a bunch of .eml attachments, and the mail system strips them out (It is at the

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
-Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Q Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:49 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [about gmane.org] If you are just reading, you can (last

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Thank you for all the input. I will give the gmane page a try when I am able. Although that is not an optimal option, it may still be better than just unsubscribing. Thank you very much to all those who answered my questions. :) -- Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:07 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:37 +, James wrote: burlingk at cv63.navy.mil writes: Is there a way to select a list option so that I can get a plain text digest

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Strictly http and https, and only through Internet Explorer. I'll give the gmane.org site a try when the network comes online. ^_^ If I can get enough of a connection to bring the pages up, then it may be acceptable for reading purposes. If that is the case, then I can use email to post. I

[gentoo-user] Problems recieving digest

2007-05-11 Thread burlingk
What format is the digest usually sent in? I got an email that seems to be a bunch of attatchements that had been stripped from the message. Is there a way to set my settings so that I get a text only digest? Most lists I am on, that is the default, so I was surprised. Please respond to this one