When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the
dependent
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I think I've gotten to the bottom of my boost problem. I have
rb_libtorrent installed which requires =dev-libs/boost-1.35, meaning
boost needs to be in package.keywords. If I remove boost from
package.keywords, should
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 23:02:38 Grant wrote:
I think I've gotten to the bottom of my boost problem. I have
rb_libtorrent installed which requires =dev-libs/boost-1.35, meaning
boost needs to be in package.keywords. If I remove boost from
package.keywords, should portage tell me there
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't
I do a daily 'emerge -avDuN world' to keep everything up to date, but
I've noticed it doesn't always find everything. As an example:
# emerge -avDuN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
Nothing
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
Is portage supposed to pick up on this with 'emerge -avDuN world'?
Not if these are build-time dependencies, in which case they'll only be
picked up when you use --with-bdeps y.
This is becoming a VFAQ.
--
Neil Bothwick
If weather bureaus
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
Is portage supposed to pick up on this with 'emerge -avDuN world'?
Not if these are build-time dependencies, in which case they'll only be
picked up when you use
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
Is portage supposed to pick up on this with 'emerge -avDuN world'?
Not if these are build-time dependencies, in which case they'll only be
picked up when you use
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0800, Grant wrote:
Is portage supposed to pick up on this with 'emerge -avDuN world'?
Not if these are build-time
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't
Grant wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the
dependent
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the
dependent
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the
dependent
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't need t0 be
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why
--with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone
once in awhile.
Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages
that don't
17 matches
Mail list logo
