On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:23 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many
improvements: $ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86
/etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage
Just a question, but
Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and contribute to
the portage project... at least
oops there was a little typo:
$ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86 /etc/portage/package.use
should be:
$ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/25/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
This doesn't look like genkernel:
It doesn't have to
On 5/26/06, leszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many
improvements: $ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86
/etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage
Just a question, but there's got to be a reason why it's still in ~x86.
Yes, it's less
I think I may have made a break through here!
I've always noticed that everything portage is very slow. It's like
it's having to un-tar and un-bzip everything all the time... lo and
behold, it is.
I've found (after much exploration) that there is a archive:
/portage-20060123.tar.bz2
This has
On 5/25/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I may have made a break through here!
I've always noticed that everything portage is very slow. It's like
it's having to un-tar and un-bzip everything all the time... lo and
behold, it is.
No, it is not.
I've found (after much
On 5/25/06, Steven Susbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I also get the bonehead award: there was a new kernel sitting on my
hard drive and just yesterday I found and installed it. It was
remarkably easy to install! I loaded the configuration
On Thu, 25 May 2006 17:33:47 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
the new, working kernel... it rewrites symlinks to the new kernel.
BTW,
Only if you specifically do a USE=symlink emerge gentoo-sources
No, that controls the /usr/src/linux symlink to the sources.
The /boot/vmlinuz symlink is
On 5/25/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 17:33:47 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
the new, working kernel... it rewrites symlinks to the new kernel.
BTW,
Only if you specifically do a USE=symlink emerge gentoo-sources
No, that controls the /usr/src/linux
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
This doesn't look like genkernel:
I loaded the configuration file from my
old kernel and then just make make install
to use genkernel, you have to call
he copied the config from his old kernel, it
is not using the default options and thus *should* work just fine.
Yeah, I missed that line. You're right. But he didn't installed the
new kernel, and alsa-driver, ndiswrapper, nvidia drivers and a lot of
other stuff claim a new compile after a
On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
This doesn't look like genkernel:
It doesn't have to look, he used the Gentoo installer, and so, it IS
On 5/25/06, Steven Susbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he copied the config from his old kernel, it
is not using the default options and thus *should* work just fine.
Yeah, I missed that line. You're right. But he didn't installed the
new kernel, and alsa-driver, ndiswrapper, nvidia
On 5/25/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he isn't because he used the installer and thus use genkernel,
hmm, its like the third time I'll say that, so, I'll stop and report
you all to read the complete thread.
It doesn't really matter how many times you say it, the OP did *not*
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 23:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
This doesn't look like genkernel:
It
On 5/25/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Lord Sauron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found (after much exploration) that there is a archive:
/portage-20060123.tar.bz2
Simply a portage snapshot, maybe the one you used to install Gentoo in
the first place? Take a look at
18 matches
Mail list logo
