Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:55:24 -0500, Dale wrote: > Also, I switch to the current kernel, it failed in the same way.  It isn't just the new kernel, it seems to be any of them.  I wonder how hard it is to switch to that other driver.  From the wiki page, it

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 09:55:24 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> Also, I switch to the current kernel, it failed in the same way.  It > >> isn't just the new kernel, it seems to be any of them.  I wonder how > >> hard it is to switch to that other driver.  From the wiki page, it > >> looks like a big deal. 

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > Dale, > > On Thursday, 2023-04-20 17:36:23 -0500, you wrote: > >> ... >> * Package:    x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03:0/470 >>  * Repository: mine > Maybe I'm missing something, but as of today "x11-drivers/nvidia-dri- > vers" version 470.182.03 is still in the

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Arve Barsnes wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 11:55, Dale wrote: >> Did something change with overlays? In the past, I copied the ebuild >> over to local overlay and ran the ebuild command for the manifest. It >> downloaded everything that was needed. Now, it seems it doesn't. They >> add a

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 03:58:11 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> I did a emerge -ef nvidia-drivers and it still fails.  I was hoping that >> would pick up the needed files.  Guess not.  I decided to do some more >> digging.  I noticed that the same version is still in the tree.  I >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:33:22 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> Also, I switch to the current kernel, it failed in the same way.  It >> isn't just the new kernel, it seems to be any of them.  I wonder how >> hard it is to switch to that other driver.  From the wiki page, it looks >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 20:33:22 -0500, Dale wrote: > Also, I switch to the current kernel, it failed in the same way.  It > isn't just the new kernel, it seems to be any of them.  I wonder how > hard it is to switch to that other driver.  From the wiki page, it looks > like a big deal.  Not really,

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 03:58:11 -0500, Dale wrote: > I did a emerge -ef nvidia-drivers and it still fails.  I was hoping that > would pick up the needed files.  Guess not.  I decided to do some more > digging.  I noticed that the same version is still in the tree.  I > copied the ebuild a while back

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 05:36:23PM -0500, Dale wrote: > /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/files/nvidia-drivers-470.141.03-clang15.patch: > No such file or directory This sounds like you copied the ebuild to your local overlay but not the files/ dir which includes the patch.

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Dale, On Thursday, 2023-04-20 17:36:23 -0500, you wrote: > ... > * Package:    x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03:0/470 >  * Repository: mine Maybe I'm missing something, but as of today "x11-drivers/nvidia-dri- vers" version 470.182.03 is still in the normal Gentoo tree. So why use your

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 11:55, Dale wrote: > Did something change with overlays? In the past, I copied the ebuild > over to local overlay and ran the ebuild command for the manifest. It > downloaded everything that was needed. Now, it seems it doesn't. They > add a step? I miss a step that

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Arve Barsnes wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 10:58, Dale wrote: >> I put my local ebuilds in /usr/local/portage. Obviously emerge sees it >> since it was trying to use it. I don't understand why it doesn't work >> tho. I looked at the ebuild in the tree and my overlay, they look the >> same,

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 10:58, Dale wrote: > I put my local ebuilds in /usr/local/portage. Obviously emerge sees it > since it was trying to use it. I don't understand why it doesn't work > tho. I looked at the ebuild in the tree and my overlay, they look the > same, including the patches from

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 08:33:22PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> I cleared the tmp files to give it a fresh start.  It still failed.  The >> directory and files it complains about being missing, they are.  I went >> to the ebuild to see what patches are supposed to be

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Am Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 08:33:22PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > I cleared the tmp files to give it a fresh start.  It still failed.  The > directory and files it complains about being missing, they are.  I went > to the ebuild to see what patches are supposed to be installed.  This is > the part of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Morgan Wesström wrote: > On 2023-04-21 00:36, Dale wrote: >> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/temp/environment: >> line 1291: >> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/files/nvidia-drivers-470.141.03-clang15.patch: >> >> No such file or directory >> >> Any

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On 2023-04-21 00:36, Dale wrote: /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/temp/environment: line 1291: /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/files/nvidia-drivers-470.141.03-clang15.patch: No such file or directory Any thoughts?  Ideas? I couldn't reproduce the

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 3:36 PM Dale wrote: > * patch -p1 failed with > /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-470.182.03/files/nvidia-drivers-470.141.03-clang15.patch You know I don't run Gentoo, right? That looks weird to me - building 470.182.03 but patching it with 470.141.03.

[gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers fails to patch

Howdy, I tried a while back to upgrade my kernel but nvidia didn't like it.  Given I can do this a piece at a time, I thought I'd try again.  Kernel compiled fine and when nvidia complained about missing options, I fixed those and recompiled the kernel.  I finally got it happy as far as missing

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers update broke screen 2.

Howdy, A while back during my routine upgrades, I got a update to nvidia-drivers.  I went from nvidia-drivers-470.129.06 to nvidia-drivers-470.141.03.  Since then, I'm having trouble getting screen 2 to stay on.  When I turn the TV on, it disables screen 2 which makes TV 2 not have a signal.  I

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers wants static-libs, I do not.

Arve Barsnes wrote: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 14:12, Dale wrote: >> I suspect Kicad is not used by most but removing digikam seemed to be >> the one that opened the door to a clear path for emerge. That package >> is commonly used. So, that info may help if a person runs into this. >> I'm not

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers wants static-libs, I do not.

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 14:12, Dale wrote: > I suspect Kicad is not used by most but removing digikam seemed to be > the one that opened the door to a clear path for emerge. That package > is commonly used. So, that info may help if a person runs into this. > I'm not sure what if any effect

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers wants static-libs, I do not.

Arve Barsnes wrote: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 09:43, Dale wrote: >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: >> (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details) >> # required by sci-libs/vtk-9.0.3-r4::gentoo[video_cards_nvidia] >> # required by

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers wants static-libs, I do not.

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 09:43, Dale wrote: > The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > (see "package.use" in the portage(5) man page for more details) > # required by sci-libs/vtk-9.0.3-r4::gentoo[video_cards_nvidia] > # required by sci-libs/opencascade-7.5.2-r5::gentoo[vtk] > #

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers wants static-libs, I do not.

Howdy, I recently did my weekly updates.  It wanted nvidia-drivers to have the static-libs USE flag enabled so I did it.  Then the video card wouldn't work when I logged out and back in because of a mismatch somewhere so I disabled static-libs and emerged it again.  That fixed the problem of no

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-440.82-r3 failing to compile: Kernel configuration is invalid

On 21/05/2020 20:25, Ashley Dixon wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Ján Zahornadský wrote: when updating the system today, a new revision of nvidia-drivers ebuild fails with ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-440.82-r3 failing to compile: Kernel configuration is invalid

On 21/05/2020 20:25, Ashley Dixon wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Ján Zahornadský wrote: when updating the system today, a new revision of nvidia-drivers ebuild fails with ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf are

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-440.82-r3 failing to compile: Kernel configuration is invalid

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Ján Zahornadský wrote: > when updating the system today, a new revision of nvidia-drivers ebuild > fails with > > ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid. >include/generated/autoconf.h or include/config/auto.conf are missing. >Run 'make oldconfig

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-440.82-r3 failing to compile: Kernel configuration is invalid

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:14 PM Ján Zahornadský wrote: > > bolt /usr/src/linux-5.6.14-gentoo # ls -l include/generated/autoconf.h > include/config/auto.conf > -rw--- 1 root root 26144 May 21 10:13 include/config/auto.conf > -rw--- 1 root root 35329 May 21 10:13

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

180709 Davyd McColl wrote: > 180610 Philip Webb wrote: >> I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , >> rebooted & 'startx' : >> the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". >> I updated to kernel 4.14.52-gentoo & tried Nvidia-drivers as above >> with the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

I have exactly the same kernel (4.14.52-gentoo) and nvidia-drivers (396.24-r1) and I don't experience this issue (though games requiring Vulkan crash out sporadically - there's an ongoing issue on the nvidia forums for this, where apparently it's already been fixed in some ancient fork, and

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

On 2018.07.08 18:46, Philip Webb wrote: 180610 Philip Webb wrote: > I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , > rebooted & 'startx' : > the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". > Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. > Nothing to see on the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

180610 Philip Webb wrote: > I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , > rebooted & 'startx' : > the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". > Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. > Nothing to see on the Forum or among Gentoo 'nvidia' bugs. > My

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

On 18-06-09 10:22 PM, Philip Webb wrote: I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , rebooted & 'startx' : the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. Nothing to see on the Forum or among Gentoo 'nvidia' bugs. My

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1

I updated to the latest stable Nvidia-drivers-396.24-r1 , rebooted & 'startx' : the result was an X error "No devices detected ... no screens found". Downgrading to 390.48 got X working again. Nothing to see on the Forum or among Gentoo 'nvidia' bugs. My kernel is 4.9.16-gentoo. Has anyone else

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers,

Some time around when Spectre/Meltdown were announced, I started experiencing similar problems. I don't know "what's wrong" because so far I have found no answers. The best I can offer at this point is that on my system, it seems that it will work with Nouveau drivers much better than the system

[gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers,

Gentlemen, we have a problem... Okay, ~ a week ago there was a power outage at my place, everything goes down for a day or two. I had recently refreshed my UPS batteries, so I had a chance to put that into the circuit, no biggy. Since nobody will offer me a job, I was playing Kerbal space

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2017, 18:53:43 CEST schrieb Alan Grimes: > I hit the "view raw" link and used save as... I then copied it into the > "files" subdirectoy and portage threw a hissy fit Please re-read the instructions in Fabio's mail. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:53:43 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > I hit the "view raw" link and used save as... I then copied it into the > "files" subdirectoy and portage threw a hissy fit and refused to do > anything because letting the user patch a package is simply > unthinkable!!! A mere USER,

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Alan Grimes wrote: > I hit the "view raw" link and used save as... I then copied it into the > "files" subdirectoy and portage threw a hissy fit and refused to do > anything because letting the user patch a package is simply > unthinkable!!!

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

I hit the "view raw" link and used save as... I then copied it into the "files" subdirectoy and portage threw a hissy fit and refused to do anything because letting the user patch a package is simply unthinkable!!! A mere USER, applying a custom patch to one of our immaculate packages on HIS OWN

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

You can drop it in /etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers folder, portage should take care of the rest when you emerge the package. You should see 3 lines near the prepare phase, before the configure phase, saying something like "applying user patches from... Applying ...Done applying

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

Looks like a good patch but can you link to instructions for applying this patch? Fabio Scaccabarozzi wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > That is expected with 4.10 kernels. > You can grab a patch from my /etc/portage repository: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

Hi Alan, That is expected with 4.10 kernels. You can grab a patch from my /etc/portage repository: https://github.com/fsvm88/gentoo-portage_etc/blob/master/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers/378.09-4.10-rc8.patch I took it from the NVidia forums, you can also find it there, I just rebased it for

[gentoo-user] Nvidia Drivers. =(

I'm still running on my old kernel as I re-build my system, Nvidia drivers just barfed ### tortoise src # ls -l total 12 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 5 09:50 linux -> linux-4.10.8/ drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4096 Apr 5 10:01 linux-4.10.8 drwxrwxr-x 25 root root 4096 Apr

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers on x64 system triggers a lot of x32 rebuilds

This was discussed on the forum but I did not see it here: recent nvidia-drivers update on ~amd64 require tens of new abi_x86_32 use flag additions for all kinds of packages. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605664 The suggested workaround (build nvidia-drivers with -tools) worked for

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Hello Meino, On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: [..] >WHOW! Thanks a lot for the patch! As this issue has just come up on gentoo-dev as well, has the patch worked for you (so far)? Please give a report if it worked or not. I've been unable to run/test my system with that patch for

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Hello, On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >David Haller [16-07-30 13:24]: [..] >> I've got it working with the attached patch in >> /etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-367.35/ [..] >Short qyestion: How can I apply it...I mean...as soon as I do an

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

james [16-07-30 20:52]: > On 07/30/2016 01:15 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > >>>Short qyestion: How can I apply it...I mean...as soon as I do an > >>>emerge, either the original source will be unpacked or my package > >>>will be rejected for being modified an different

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

On 07/30/2016 01:15 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Short qyestion: How can I apply it...I mean...as soon as I do an emerge, either the original source will be unpacked or my package will be rejected for being modified an different from the one, which does not compile...

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Andrew Lowe [16-07-30 20:12]: > On 31/07/2016 1:54 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >David Haller [16-07-30 13:24]: > >>Hello, > >> > >>On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >>>trying the new kernel linux-4.7 (vanilla, downloaded from > > [snip] >

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

On 31/07/2016 1:54 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: David Haller [16-07-30 13:24]: Hello, On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: trying the new kernel linux-4.7 (vanilla, downloaded from [snip] Short qyestion: How can I apply it...I mean...as soon as I do an

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

David Haller [16-07-30 13:24]: > Hello, > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >trying the new kernel linux-4.7 (vanilla, downloaded from > >ftp.kernel.org) with nvidia drivers > >(Installed versions: 367.35-r1^md(03:00:46 07/30/16)(X driver kms > >multilib

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Hello, On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >trying the new kernel linux-4.7 (vanilla, downloaded from >ftp.kernel.org) with nvidia drivers >(Installed versions: 367.35-r1^md(03:00:46 07/30/16)(X driver kms >multilib uvm -acpi -compat -gtk3 -pax_kernel -static-libs -tools >-wayland

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Andrew Lowe [16-07-30 08:44]: > On 30/07/16 14:09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >Hi, > > > >thank you for your reply ! :) > >I have to use the nvidia drivers, because I am using Blender, which > >renders via CUDA on the GPU... > > > >Best regards > >Meino > > > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

On 30/07/16 14:09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, thank you for your reply ! :) I have to use the nvidia drivers, because I am using Blender, which renders via CUDA on the GPU... Best regards Meino Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku [16-07-30 08:04]: I have an earlier

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Hi, thank you for your reply ! :) I have to use the nvidia drivers, because I am using Blender, which renders via CUDA on the GPU... Best regards Meino Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku [16-07-30 08:04]: > I have an earlier version of the x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers

Re: [gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

I have an earlier version of the x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers installed (361.28), but if I recall, I couldn't get x11 to use them. Or maybe they are already using them, but I don't know it (but I believe I couldn't get the tools to recognize that they were being used). My understanding is that

[gentoo-user] NVidia drivers and vanilla kernel Linux 4.7.0 anyone?

Hi, trying the new kernel linux-4.7 (vanilla, downloaded from ftp.kernel.org) with nvidia drivers (Installed versions: 367.35-r1^md(03:00:46 07/30/16)(X driver kms multilib uvm -acpi -compat -gtk3 -pax_kernel -static-libs -tools -wayland KERNEL="linux -FreeBSD")). The kernel compiled fine, the

[Solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers does not compile anymore

2016-04-30 17:41 GMT+02:00 Jacques Montier : > 2016-04-30 15:25 GMT+02:00 Neil Bothwick : > >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:01:12 +0200, Jacques Montier wrote: >> >> > You can get the complete log in the attached file >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers does not compile anymore

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 14:01:12 +0200, Jacques Montier wrote: > You can get the complete log in the attached file > x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-340.76:20160430-104727.log Which ends with !!! User patches were applied to this build! Are you applying your own patches? Do you have anything in

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers does not compile anymore

On 30/04/2016 12:52, Jacques Montier wrote: > Hello all, > > I need nvidia-drivers-340.76 for my Nvidia GeForce GT240 graphic card. > I use nvidia-drivers-340.76 from a local overlay with the > nvidia-drivers-340-76-kernel-4.0.patch which works fine with > gentoo-sources-4.1.15-r1. > I would like

[gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers does not compile anymore

Hello all, I need nvidia-drivers-340.76 for my Nvidia GeForce GT240 graphic card. I use nvidia-drivers-340.76 from a local overlay with the nvidia-drivers-340-76-kernel-4.0.patch which works fine with gentoo-sources-4.1.15-r1. I would like to upgrade to the 4.4.6 kernel. Unfortunately,

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:00:40 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:38:45 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > It's nothing to worry about, deprecated only mean is will be broken at > > > some time in the future, it still works for now. IMO ebuild QA > > > messages like this should

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:00:07 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > The idea is that users should ping developers with appropriate bug > > > reports. > > > > Instead, they ask in here or on the forums. Shouldn't the devs see > > such messages anyway and already be aware of the need to update the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:04:14 -0500 Philip Webb wrote: > 160201 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:03:50 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >>> Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done > >>> * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done > * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is using the deprecated > readme.gentoo.eclass.<<>> > * Please use readme.gentoo-r1 instead. > What does the marked line implies? This is an outdated

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:38:45 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > It's nothing to worry about, deprecated only mean is will be broken at > > some time in the future, it still works for now. IMO ebuild QA > > messages like this should not be shown to users. > > The idea is that users should ping

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

160201 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:03:50 + Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >>> Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done >>> * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is using the deprecated >>> readme.gentoo.eclass.<<>> >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:03:50 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:56:37 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Switching to nvidia OpenCL interface... done > > * x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is using the deprecated > > readme.gentoo.eclass.<<>> > > * Please use readme.gentoo-r1

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers using deprecated...

hi, ths morning brings an update to the nividia-drivers, whch where successfully emerged and installed. Right at the end of this process this was prointed on the console: * Removing x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-361.18-r2 from moduledb. Switching to nvidia OpenGL interface... done >>> Regenerating

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-340.76 failed with gentoo-sources-4.0.5

Hi all, Because of an old graphic card, i have to compile nvidia-drivers-340.76. nvidia-drivers-340.76 does not compile with the new 4.0.5 kernel. Here is the output error : /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-340.76/work/kernel/nv-pat.o] Error 1 I saw a topic about that problem on

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers 325.15 removal

131214 »Q« wrote: It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a mistake I run mostly stable amd64. I *think* 325.15 was the latest stable [I] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers Available versions: 96.43.23^msd 173.14.39^msd 304.116^msd ~304.117^msd 319.76^msd 331.20^msd {+X

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers 325.15 removal

It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a mistake, but I've got a lot going on in the meat world right now, and I don't want to file a bug if I've simply gotten confused. I run mostly stable amd64. I have 325.15 installed, and nothing regarding nvidia-drivers in

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers segfault when starting X

Hi there, When I start X (or start kdm), I get a segmentation fault and no X. The Xorg-log says: [ 8675.702] (**) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32 [ 8675.702] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888 [ 8675.702] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor [ 8675.702] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: The problem. After I am logged into KDE for a good while, like several hours to maybe a day or so, the kicker thingy at the bottom locks up tight. I can't switch desktops, clock stops working, can't click the K menu thingy

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Paul Hartman wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: The problem. After I am logged into KDE for a good while, like several hours to maybe a day or so, the kicker thingy at the bottom locks up tight. I can't switch desktops, clock stops working, can't click

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

On Sun, 26 May 2013 07:10:53 -0500 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 13:03, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 11:51, Dale wrote: What package provides the kicker thingy? I think in KDE3 it was called kicker but it appears to have

[gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Howdy, I been letting portage upgrade nvidia drivers as usual. Thing is, the last two or three drivers seems to cause a issue. First, versions that cause the issue: =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.12 =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.17 =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.23 I'm currently using

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

On 26/05/2013 11:12, Dale wrote: Howdy, I been letting portage upgrade nvidia drivers as usual. Thing is, the last two or three drivers seems to cause a issue. First, versions that cause the issue: =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.12 =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.17

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Alan McKinnon wrote: I get a similar issue, my video card is an ATI and I use the radeon drivers. Same symptom as you - plasma stops updating it's widgets like clocks and stops responding to the mouse. Keyboard works. In my case, it's usually linked to nfs and smb mounts that went away (eg, if

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

On 26/05/2013 11:51, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: I get a similar issue, my video card is an ATI and I use the radeon drivers. Same symptom as you - plasma stops updating it's widgets like clocks and stops responding to the mouse. Keyboard works. In my case, it's usually linked to nfs and

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 11:51, Dale wrote: What package provides the kicker thingy? I think in KDE3 it was called kicker but it appears to have changed to something else. Is that krunner that has it now? Maybe it's time you used the thingy suffix a little less and the real

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

On 26/05/2013 13:03, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 11:51, Dale wrote: What package provides the kicker thingy? I think in KDE3 it was called kicker but it appears to have changed to something else. Is that krunner that has it now? Maybe it's time you used the thingy

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 13:03, Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/05/2013 11:51, Dale wrote: What package provides the kicker thingy? I think in KDE3 it was called kicker but it appears to have changed to something else. Is that krunner that has it now? Maybe it's time you

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers and KDE problem

Am 26.05.2013 11:12, schrieb Dale: Howdy, I been letting portage upgrade nvidia drivers as usual. Thing is, the last two or three drivers seems to cause a issue. First, versions that cause the issue: =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.12 =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.17

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers fail to determine kernel version

Hi, when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed) emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine. As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails because the kernel version couldnt be determined. Both times /usr/src/linux symlinks to the according kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers fail to determine kernel version

Note sure it's something wrong that you did, but that sure is strange... It usually happens when switching from 3.x to 3.y kernel version... When you're trying to emerge nvidia-drivers, are you running the recently compiled kernel? 2013/2/5 meino.cra...@gmx.de Hi, when using vanilla kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers fail to determine kernel version

Hi Alexandre, thanks for your reply! :) Both kernels were compiled the same way prior to emergeing the nvidia-drivers. In both cases the symlink /usr/src/linux points to the correct kernel sources... I also to booted into the kernel for which I want to emerge the drivers which doesnt make a

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers fail to determine kernel version

meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi Alexandre, thanks for your reply! :) Both kernels were compiled the same way prior to emergeing the nvidia-drivers. In both cases the symlink /usr/src/linux points to the correct kernel sources... I also to booted into the kernel for which I want to emerge the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers fail to determine kernel version

Hi, It could be because it's hard coded in the nvidia sh script... It used to be like that, don't know if it's still the case... Le 5 févr. 2013 16:32, meino.cra...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Alexandre, thanks for your reply! :) Both kernels were compiled the same way prior to emergeing the

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-304.64 build failure against vanilla linux-3.7.4

On 01/27/2013 01:06 AM, staticsafe wrote: I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to build. As requested by the error message: I had the same problem, I had success with this:

[gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers-304.64 build failure against vanilla linux-3.7.4

I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to build. As requested by the error message: output of `emerge --info '=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-304.64'`: http://sprunge.us/QLUN output of `emerge -pqv

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4

don't, use 295.59 :) 2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net I haven't seen any mention of the problem here, but after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from

Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4

120615 microcai wrote: 2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to -/-/-/-/x86/include/asm : system.h

[gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4

I haven't seen any mention of the problem here, but after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to -/-/-/-/x86/include/asm : system.h compiler.h

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers vs. nouveau

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 11.04.2012 23:16, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com: I use the nouveau drivers because they update themselves when you update the kernel, and

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers vs. nouveau

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:36:06 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 11.04.2012 23:16, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com: I use the nouveau drivers because they update themselves when you update the kernel,

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers vs. nouveau

On 04/12/2012 09:09:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: That was the previous laptop. This current one has an ATI card and I use ati drivers rather than fglrx for the same reason. What's the difference (in performance) between fglrx and xf86-video-ati ? Do both of them support GPU usage? Thanks

Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia-drivers vs. nouveau

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:06:17 +0200 Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: On 04/12/2012 09:09:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: That was the previous laptop. This current one has an ATI card and I use ati drivers rather than fglrx for the same reason. What's the difference (in

  1   2   3   >