On 12/11/2011 1:10 PM, James Broadhead wrote:
On 11 December 2011 10:41, Andrea Contia...@alyf.net wrote:
On 27/11/11 16.36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but completely
gone from portage.
FYI, sys-apps/openrc-0.9.7 is out.
Apparently,
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 12/11/2011 1:10 PM, James Broadhead wrote:
On 11 December 2011 10:41, Andrea Contia...@alyf.net wrote:
On 27/11/11 16.36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but
completely
gone from portage.
FYI, sys-apps/openrc-0.9.7
Am 13.12.2011 00:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:23:16 +0100
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Same here. All my server VMs work just fine with parallel enabled.
There's nothing complex in them, they tend to be single-service
machines.
Don't tell me you
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:29:16 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to
OpenRC a year+(?) ago.
You are not a representative sample.
worksforme
In production servers, even. Virtualized on top of XenServer. All of
Am 12.12.2011 09:43, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:29:16 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to
OpenRC a year+(?) ago.
You are not a representative sample.
worksforme
In production servers, even.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:23:16 +0100
Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Same here. All my server VMs work just fine with parallel enabled.
There's nothing complex in them, they tend to be single-service
machines.
Don't tell me you reboot your servers so often that it is
On 27/11/11 16.36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but completely
gone from portage.
FYI, sys-apps/openrc-0.9.7 is out.
Apparently, the solution to the rc_parallel issues was to remove every
mention of rc_parallel from the default /etc/rc.conf
On 11 December 2011 10:41, Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net wrote:
On 27/11/11 16.36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but completely
gone from portage.
FYI, sys-apps/openrc-0.9.7 is out.
Apparently, the solution to the rc_parallel issues was to
On 12/11/2011 01:10 PM, James Broadhead wrote:
I didn't take this email at face value when I read it earlier, but I
just merged my openrc-0.9.7 config file.
Wow, what a cynical move.
It's not cynical. If you put a cool-sounding option in there with a
comment that says this will delete all of
On 11 December 2011 21:42, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 12/11/2011 01:10 PM, James Broadhead wrote:
I didn't take this email at face value when I read it earlier, but I
just merged my openrc-0.9.7 config file.
Wow, what a cynical move.
It's not cynical. If you put a
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:48:11 +, James Broadhead wrote:
Parallel doesn't work correctly, and it shouldn't be enabled unless
you're looking for fun ways to break stuff.
It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to OpenRC
a year+(?) ago.
You are not a representative
On Dec 12, 2011 6:00 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:48:11 +, James Broadhead wrote:
Parallel doesn't work correctly, and it shouldn't be enabled unless
you're looking for fun ways to break stuff.
It's worked for me ever since I switched all of
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:28:42PM +0100, Andrea Conti wrote
It had a little problem in resolving the dependencies of a newly
introduced boot service that created a cycle and caused the boot process
to hang (almost) forever with rc_parallel=YES.
With 100% repeatability, mind you, which does
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:28 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
With 100% repeatability, mind you, which does raise same questions on
the amount of testing done before release. Yes, it's ~arch and
rc_parallel is explicitly marked experimental, but it's not expected
to be completely and consistently
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but completely
gone from portage.
What happened to it?
On Sun 27 Nov 2011 09:06:39 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but
completely gone from portage.
What happened to it?
0.9.6? I updated my tree 24h before writing this reply. It's still not
there. Only upto 0.9.4 - is masked.
--
Am 27.11.2011 17:22, schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan:
On Sun 27 Nov 2011 09:06:39 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but
completely gone from portage.
What happened to it?
0.9.6? I updated my tree 24h before writing this reply. It's still
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Sun 27 Nov 2011 09:06:39 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but
completely gone from portage.
What happened to it?
0.9.6? I updated my tree 24h before writing this reply. It's still not
there. Only upto
On 27/11/11 16.36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
sys-apps/openrc-0.9.6 is just... gone? Not even masked, but completely
gone from portage.
What happened to it?
Last time I checked it was hardmasked. Now it's been confined into
oblivion, I hope.
It had a little problem in resolving the
19 matches
Mail list logo
