On Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
should be
referred to using the neuter form of pronouns, i.e. it, as befitting
their overall contribution to humanity.
You see what I did there? You see how I recovered with a witty reposte
without even blinking an eye? It takes
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:16 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
While we are nitpicking:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
That should be greatest writer, the other fellow was not the greatest - he
merely wrote soap operas.
--
alan dot
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
Who do you class as the greatest English writer then?
, so that should be
telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
[nipick] even form me? :P [/nitpick]
--
Joost
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
Who do you class as the greatest English writer then?
Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:29:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
That should be greatest writer, the other fellow was not the greatest
- he merely wrote soap operas.
I don't know what you mean, unless you mistakenly assumed I was referring
On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:22:35 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
[nipick] even form me? :P [/nitpick]
I think we should both be more careful with our typing when nit-picking :(
--
Neil Bothwick
COMMAND: A suggestion made to a
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:35:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost
Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
Who do you class as the
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:19:30 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:22:35 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
[nipick] even form me? :P [/nitpick]
I think we should both be more careful with our typing when nit-picking :(
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:21 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:35:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost
Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:40:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:16 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
While we are nitpicking:
Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
That should be greatest writer, the other
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 06:18, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them
On Sun, 15 May 2011 22:54:14 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Why setup didn't get this right via emerge I have no idea, unless it
didn't actually do anything toward actually setting Grub up.
Emerging GRUB installs it, that's all. The post installation message
would have told you to set i up, but
On 2011-05-15 10:54 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Why setup didn't get this right via emerge I have no idea, unless it
didn't actually do anything toward actually setting Grub up. If so, it
could be there was already some mismatched Grub code there already from
a previous use of the sectors there
That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 07:58:34
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chicken -- egg (NFS tty video
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:43:05 +, JDM wrote:
That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
--
Neil Bothwick
WinErr 001: Windows loaded - System in danger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 16/5/2011, at 1:43pm, JDM wrote:
Most people set things up so they get emails of the post install
messages when emerging things, but it is up to you to actually read them
and, when necessary, follow the instructions.
That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
$ grep -i
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:10:03PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:43:05 +, JDM wrote:
That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
Or as that man page says,
Please see
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:00:02AM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading the kernel works, but chainload
gives error 13 invalid
On 2011/05/16 11:26 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:00:02AM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my plan.
After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good kernel, NFS,
and MC that I didn't see much point delaying KDE. After the errors
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:18:49PM -0400, Indi wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
plan.
After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good kernel,
NFS,
and
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
plan. After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:57:14 -0400, Indi wrote:
Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
Or as that man page says,
Please see /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example
for elog documentation.
I know that's what the man page currently says, but I expect it will be
updated to
Thnx, have followed advice. I am impressed.
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:57:26
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chicken -- egg (NFS tty video) (Fixed!)
On Mon
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
plan. After so much time passed (days, not
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:15 on Monday 16 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:10:02PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:57:14 -0400, Indi wrote:
Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
Or as that man page says,
Please see /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example
for elog documentation.
I know
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
posted he read 1667MHZ as 167MHz.
Amazing what a difference a 1 can make :-)
Not nearly as much as
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
On 2011/05/16 19:01 (GMT-0400) Neil Bothwick composed:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
he read 1667MHZ as 167MHz.
Amazing what a difference a 1 can make :-)
Not nearly as much as a 6 :P
Sure it can! In 101000b, any of those 1s represents more than 6.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
posted he read 1667MHZ as 167MHz.
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:28 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
Alan, but
On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading the kernel works, but chainload
gives error 13 invalid executable format. I named the bzImage copied to /boot
33 matches
Mail list logo
