On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:35:44 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Anyway, you don't need to add something to remind you
of the partition's position; /etc/mtab will use regular device names,
so you can see what's going on with 'cat /etc/mtab' or simply 'mount'
without parameters.
cfdisk also
Hi, Nikos!
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
I'm totally confused. Doesn't sd* mean SCSI disk drive? When I was
installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive.
From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI drives.
For ATA drives I think it is 63?
Not sure if this is a Linux OS
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:05:10 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive. It's a bit like the old MS-DOS restriction to
512 MB all over again. Hey, guys, hard drives nowadays are like 200
gig, not 512meg.
Hi, Mick,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive.
From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI
drives.
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel
without legacy ATA drivers, how would I know
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have
the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new
kernel without
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
[...]
Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or
any other bootable CD, would those labels still be there?
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when
Dale wrote:
True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which
is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then.
I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something
else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to
have to
Hi, Nikos,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06:15PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them
works, because I installed Gentoo from it.
When I do
mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom
, it comes back with special
Hi, Miernik,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0
This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no
mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard
drives are (don't
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's /dev/sda and /dev/sda1, and no other /dev/sd*. That's where my
UBS stick gets mounted.
What about any /dev/sr*?
13 matches
Mail list logo