From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes
BRM wrote:
From: Paul Hartmanpaul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2011)
# Old
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Tomáš Chvátalscarab...@gentoo.org
Yeap there is a version for windows and it works fine. :)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
#
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed this today:
The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 15:56:57 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to emerge and
on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than OpenOffice? Build times are nearly identical on
my system but I
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
Is it much worse than
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge and on at least two machines
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-07-28 12:00 PM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011 16:45:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds
13 matches
Mail list logo
