On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:29:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland
revdep-rebuild would catch everything including the library
specified. Wrong, I see.
Would preserved-rebuild catch everything that the revdep-rebuild fails
to catch?
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:06:30 -0700
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 01:39 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:58:14 -0400
Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18 2011, walt wrote:
I just did a routine update on my ~amd64 machine
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
checks just some things.
ebuilds sometimes issue messages to check just the libraries known
to have been updated, but a full revdep-rebuild after an update
will catch those anyway.
On Monday, 19. September 2011 10:20:25 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
checks just some things.
ebuilds sometimes issue messages to check just the libraries known
to have been updated, but a
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
checks just some things.
ebuilds sometimes issue messages to check just the libraries known
to have been updated,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:10:02 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Re: Updating libpng: another libtool cockup?:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:06:30 -0700
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I don't skip the --library step any more.
That's odd behaviour, I wonder what caused
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
SNIP
ajglap gottlieb # revdep-rebuild; revdep-rebuild --library
'/usr/lib64/libpng14.so.14'
SNIP
Is there no automated way to catch these? --library
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
SNIP
ajglap gottlieb # revdep-rebuild; revdep-rebuild --library
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
SNIP
On Monday 19 September 2011 16:49:55 David W Noon wrote:
I hope this has explained why we should take messages about running
revdep-rebuild --library libXXX seriously.
Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland revdep-rebuild would
catch everything including the library
On Monday, 19. September 2011 13:52:26 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:
On Monday, 19. September 2011 13:52:26 Mark Knecht wrote:
SNIP
/lib64/libncurses.so.5 /lib64/libncurses.so.6 could both exist on
the system even if both version of the ncurses package don't.
That's right. But keep
Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Monday 19 September 2011 16:49:55 David W Noon wrote:
I hope this has explained why we should take messages about running
revdep-rebuild --library libXXX seriously.
Well, you have me convinced. I had assumed that a bland revdep-rebuild
13 matches
Mail list logo
