On Tuesday 13 April 2010 16:49:44 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 13 Apr, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 12 April 2010 16:55:38 Paul Hartman wrote:
I've been using portage unmasked for a very long time and don't
remember having any portage-related problems. I'm sure there must be
some (or else
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-04-12 12:23 PM, Dale wrote:
+1 I been using the latest portage for a long time too. I don't recall
any problems with it and the new features sure do help.
If you keyword portage, you need to do the same for its friends. Mainly
gentoolkit and eix. They seem to
On Monday 12 April 2010 16:55:38 Paul Hartman wrote:
I've been using portage unmasked for a very long time and don't
remember having any portage-related problems. I'm sure there must be
some (or else why is it still RC?) but for me the new features are
worth the potential risk of using
On 13 Apr, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 12 April 2010 16:55:38 Paul Hartman wrote:
I've been using portage unmasked for a very long time and don't
remember having any portage-related problems. I'm sure there must be
some (or else why is it still RC?) but for me the new features are
worth
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 15:49:44 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 13 Apr, Peter Humphrey wrote:
As far as I know, that's the only thing preventing release of v2,
and I think it's been fixed anyway.
No, I don't think so.
Just recently, I had to unmerge then emerge wxpython since
emerge
Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
files,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
did --resume
when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or two
I've already seen packages doing that, but they shouldn't happen, right? :-)
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two, it makes it easier to just ignore it.
Hopefully no one will mind a slight OT question, but still
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two, it makes it easier to just
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system
On 2010-04-12 12:23 PM, Dale wrote:
+1 I been using the latest portage for a long time too. I don't recall
any problems with it and the new features sure do help.
If you keyword portage, you need to do the same for its friends. Mainly
gentoolkit and eix. They seem to go together better.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
regarded as stable releases for the developers, and the truth is that
the problems I got for using outdated software were more that the ones I
had for using unstable
On Sunday 11 April 2010 20:36:37 Damian wrote:
Hello,
I've been using the gentoo stable branch since I began with this distro
(around 4 years ago), but lately I've been unmasking almost all packages
I use in my daily work (emacs, firefox, gnome*, xmonad, etc).
The reason for doing so is
Damian writes:
Thus, I'm thinking about switching all of my system to the unstable
branch. But first I want to be sure that this is reasonable given the
problems I described before.
Can you provide me some useful advice according to your experience?
I have asked a similar question here, I
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
regarded as stable releases for the developers, and the truth is that
the problems I got for using
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:36:37 +0200, Damian wrote:
The reason for doing so is that what is considered as unstable as been
regarded as stable
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:24:18 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I have a new machine that just came up yesterday. I was thinking of
running ~arch on it and seeing how things work out. Seems like it's a
good time to do it if I'm ever going to as I haven't started using it
and it's going to get busy. If
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
1) I don't see any mention of hald dbus in the upgrade guide. I
currently have them turned on. Are they still necessary? I know hald
is going away one of these days. Is it too early for me to dump it.
Possibly dump hald before the
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:07 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
1) I don't see any mention of hald dbus in the upgrade guide. I
currently have them turned on. Are they still necessary? I know hald
is going away one of these
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
files, follow the openrc update etc and then reboot. The world part of
the update will take quite a while, especially if you use KDE or
GNOME.
hehe Less than
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
files, follow the openrc update etc and then reboot. The world part of
the update will take
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
did --resume --skip-first and moved on for now.
SNIP
So it's done and I'm
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
did
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
So help2man won't build due to some missing perl module.
I'm assuming this isn't bad enough to stop a reboot from being
successful but @system is @system so no reboot until I hear something
back. (Or I get bored
26 matches
Mail list logo
