On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:51, Ralph Slooten wrote:
Hiya list,
I bought myself a new AMD Athlon64 in December, and initially installed
it as a 64-bit Gentoo. In January this year I decided to reinstall it as
a 32-bit OS due to constant issues with flash plugins, win32 codecs etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
netscape-flash works with mozilla-firefox-bin and any other 32-bit browser,
it's also possible to make it work with 64-bit konqueror. You might also be
interested in looking at net-www/gnash, still alpha quality but
Yes they are for different architectures, the main architectural difference
being the addition of sse2 in athlon64 cpus. There may possibly be other
differences in how gcc optimizes based on that -march setting, however i'm
not 100% certain if this is the case, I suspect not.
On Wednesday, 31
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 11:52, Ralph Slooten wrote:
-march=athlon64 implies -msse2, all amd64 cpus have sse2 support.
and some have even sse3 (E6)
Also -ftracer is not in the safe cflags list, personally I would not use
it but if you believe it benefits you then go ahead.
Another
On Thursday, 1 June 2006 0:38, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Also -ftracer is not in the safe cflags list, personally I would not
use it but if you believe it benefits you then go ahead.
Another handy tip. Can't remember why I had it (did the research when
I reinstalled it 32bit). I'll
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:51:47 +0930
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2006 0:38, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Also -ftracer is not in the safe cflags list, personally I would not
use it but if you believe it benefits you then go ahead.
Another
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 18:29, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:51:47 +0930
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2006 0:38, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Also -ftracer is not in the safe cflags list, personally I would
not use it but
Hi,
On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:38:05 +0200
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 18:29, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:51:47 +0930
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it was harmless and beneficial it'd already be included in an
8 matches
Mail list logo
