[gentoo-user] [OT] Top-post with full quote (was: you have cruft in /proc remove it)

2008-04-17 Thread Michael Schmarck
maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> First: Don't top post! >> > > Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see > at a glance which is the original and which the reply. And since your post was so tiny, you really should have trimmed what you quoted. This could easily mean, that a

[gentoo-user] Versioning scheme (was: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises)

2008-04-17 Thread Michael Schmarck
Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, need for a rev bump. If one person has a problem and another person > does not have the problem, it is helpfull to be able to determine the > exact version of the packet installed. Not bumping revs makes that harder. Exactly. There should be

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Florian Philipp
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 20:05 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote: > At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:16:54 +0200, > Florian Philipp wrote: > > I personally use dar and gpg. Dar can be used to make incremental > > backups which should partly solve your speed problem. Alternatively you > > could use tar and gpg or cpio or

Re: [gentoo-user] udev and baselayout2

2008-04-17 Thread Justin
Daniel Pielmeier schrieb: Justin schrieb: to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2? Openrc requires >sys-fs/udev-118-r2. As far as i know udev-120 is going to be stabilized with openrc/baselayout-2 which I use too. Didn't have any problems so far! Regards, Daniel Thank

Re: [gentoo-user] [ot] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread Dan Farrell
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:29:55 -0700 (PDT) maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First: Don't top post! > > > > Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see > at a glance which is the original and which the reply. > What's with people making the biggest deal out of this? The ubun

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread Gustavo Campos
> I dunno, I was talking about the Vera Sans. I was going to look for Segoe > later. Thanks for the tip on terminus as well. I haver just tried it in my > konsole and it looks great. Oh I see! Sorry for that, I really understood you were talking about the Segoe!! And terminus is just aweso

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Gustavo Campos: > > Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so.. > > Is Segoe UI really in Portage? At the last time I emerged corefonts it > wasn't present, so I had to find it on the web =) I dunno, I was talking about the Vera Sans. I was going to look for Segoe lat

[gentoo-user] Talking about fonts...

2008-04-17 Thread Gustavo Campos
After Liviu's post about fonts I just start re-thinking about my font setup. My fonts look really good, but for some reason I want to know if they can look even better... I remember some months ago the trouble about libxft and cairo patches to enable bci stuff. Of course I've got freetype with bin

[gentoo-user] alsa-plugins emerge failure

2008-04-17 Thread Walter Dnes
I don't know if this is relevant, but I just recovered from unmerging coreutils, which I promise never ever to do again. Now that I have things working again, and revdep-rebuild says I'm OK. I went back and re-ran "emerge --ask --deep --update --world". It's dieing on the last item, namely als

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread Gustavo Campos
> Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so.. Is Segoe UI really in Portage? At the last time I emerged corefonts it wasn't present, so I had to find it on the web =) And by free, I meant the really free free, you know =) > I was simply stating what I use because I think it l

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Gustavo Campos: > That's not free, that's M$ stuff, but I'd suggest you to take a look, > just take a look, at Segoe UI fonts. Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so.. Besides, the OP mentioned no requirement that the font must be 'free'. I was simply stating what I

Re: [gentoo-user] Unmerged coreutils + mktemp; can't emerge anymore

2008-04-17 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 09:48:15PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote about his incredible saga of thud and blunder. Sorry about the panic post. I got flustered and posted right away, when I should've checked for similar threads. Problem solved as per the suggestions in the other threads. Reminder to s

Re: [gentoo-user] Unmerged coreutils + mktemp; can't emerge anymore

2008-04-17 Thread Chris Brennan
what did you unmerge? On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume I'll have to download some gentoo system binaries. Can > someone point me to what I need? > > Here's what happened. I did a regular "emerge --sync" and then tried > an update. There seemed

[gentoo-user] Unmerged coreutils + mktemp; can't emerge anymore

2008-04-17 Thread Walter Dnes
I assume I'll have to download some gentoo system binaries. Can someone point me to what I need? Here's what happened. I did a regular "emerge --sync" and then tried an update. There seemed to be a circular blockage involving both coreutils and mktemp. As I've done in similar situations in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Also this package is in ~arch and left package.mask recently, so it is > under testing and you have to expect problems! problems, yes. The nuking of important config files and non-boot: no. That is complety inacceptable for something that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: > > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/base > >>lay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 > > > > oh great, changes without a

Re: [gentoo-user] Sound jack isolations

2008-04-17 Thread Richard Marzan
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:11 -0500, Richard Marzan wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: > > I tried googling around but no helpful content so far. I have a > > laptop with built-in sound. It uses the HDA_intel kernel module. My > > problem is that I can't silence th

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread Philip Webb
080417 Liviu Andronic wrote: > Although perfectly aware that this is a much subjective business, ... Very much so ! > ... I am looking for "best" fonts > and would much appreciate your sharing of personal choices. I like New Century Schoolbook for variable spacing, with URW Palladio as a good al

Re: [gentoo-user] udev and baselayout2

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Justin schrieb: to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2? Openrc requires >sys-fs/udev-118-r2. As far as i know udev-120 is going to be stabilized with openrc/baselayout-2 which I use too. Didn't have any problems so far! Regards, Daniel -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org

Top posting (Was Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it)

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
maxim wexler schrieb: >> First: Don't top post! >> > > Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see > at a glance which is the original and which the reply. Irrelevant! I answered you below, what happens when you answer again on the top, and so on? Answer5 Answer3 Answer1 Question Ans

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread Gustavo Campos
That's not free, that's M$ stuff, but I'd suggest you to take a look, just take a look, at Segoe UI fonts. I Don't know any free fonts comparable to it, but there's a story of some guy who charged M$ for using his font as base for Segoe... I don't know if that font is free, or even if it exists, b

Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread maxim wexler
> First: Don't top post! > Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see at a glance which is the original and which the reply. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.

Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Neil Bothwick schrieb: On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:20 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: Second: I don't think this is normal filesystem cruft like which is discussed in the forum. The proc (proc <- Process information pseudo-filesystem) filesystem contains information about the state of your syste

Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:20 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Second: I don't think this is normal filesystem cruft like which is > discussed in the forum. The proc (proc <- Process information > pseudo-filesystem) filesystem contains information about the state of > your system and the running

Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
maxim wexler schrieb: Here's a useful discussioin: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-254197-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-findcruft-start-50.html --- Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, does anybody know where the message you have cruft in /proc remove it comes from and wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that. No need for a rev bump here i guess! Anybody who

Re: [gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread maxim wexler
Here's a useful discussioin: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-254197-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-findcruft-start-50.html --- Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > does anybody know where the message > you have cruft in /proc remove it > comes from and what to do about

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > > fsck runs with the -p optio

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselay >out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:57:47 +0200, Remy Blank wrote: > > I'm now testing app-backup/boxbackup, > > which seems good so far. > > Please report your findings on the list! I'm not all too happy about my > current solution (rdiff-backup locally to a filesystem over dmcrypt, > loopback-mounted fr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:45:53 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > > It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I > > upgraded. > > Armin has at least one machine and I've got 2 were this happened and > there are reports in the forum discussion thread reg. disappearance > of /e

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Michael Schmarck schrieb: · Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: Because you didn't read the elog messages. it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid. It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Chris Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jan Seeger wrote: | At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:37:52 -0400, | Chris Walters wrote: | This sounds like a feasible solution, I will try it out. Thanks for | the idea, Florian and Chris. | | I'm just wondering what the dar64 and dar32 useflags do... As I

[gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Michael Schmarck
· Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> > Because you didn't read the elog messages. >> >> it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid. > > It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three mach

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Jan Seeger
At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:37:52 -0400, Chris Walters wrote: > I also use dar, but I don't bother with gpg. I use the '-K:' option of dar, > which provides passphrase protected blowfish protection. I suppose I could > use > gpg, as well, with AES256 or IDEA, but that would be overkill, I think, sinc

[gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Remy Blank
Neil Bothwick wrote: I'm now testing app-backup/boxbackup, which seems good so far. Please report your findings on the list! I'm not all too happy about my current solution (rdiff-backup locally to a filesystem over dmcrypt, loopback-mounted from a file, followed by an rsync over ssh to a rem

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > > -p option >

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > > -p option >

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Chris Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Florian Philipp wrote: | On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote: |> As per the subject: |> |> I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like |> to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have |>

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > -p option > > Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. > > Bye... > > Dirk no, the

[gentoo-user] udev and baselayout2

2008-04-17 Thread Justin
Hi guys, to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2? Thanks, justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Jan Seeger
At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:16:54 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote: > I personally use dar and gpg. Dar can be used to make incremental > backups which should partly solve your speed problem. Alternatively you > could use tar and gpg or cpio or whatever floats your boat. Duplicity also does incremental bac

Re: [gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread darren kirby
quoth the Liviu Andronic: > > So, what font do you use for the User Interface? > Happy with Bitstream Vera Sans myself. Clean, clear, and looks good. For fixed I use Courier 10-pitch. -d -- darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org "...the number of UNIX installa

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:54:50 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote: > I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like > to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have > tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is > unbearably slow (being on a laptop). Wh

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Because you didn't read the elog messages. > > it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid. It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I upgraded. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 was removed

[gentoo-user] OT Best font selection?

2008-04-17 Thread Liviu Andronic
Hello everyone, Although perfectly aware that this is a much subjective business, I am looking for "best" fonts, and would much appreciate your sharing of personal choices. This Wiki article [1] has some insight, but not sufficient to satisfy my quest. For best printed output I have settled for e

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > -p option Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtente

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Florian Philipp
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote: > As per the subject: > > I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like > to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have > tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is > unbearably slow

Re: [gentoo-user] [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown] another dead email address

2008-04-17 Thread Dale
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote: Has anybody else who recently posted to the list gotten an email bounce for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes Here to, so +1. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] mesa / 3d driver for openchrome

2008-04-17 Thread Uwe Thiem
Hi folks, according to the mesa web site, mesa-7.0.2 contains a 3d driver for openchrome. Unfortunately, the ebuild knows only about a very limited number of video cards, openchrome not amoung them. How can I convince it to compile the openchrome 3d driver? Uwe -- Informal Linux Group Namibi

[gentoo-user] Encrypted backups under Gentoo

2008-04-17 Thread Jan Seeger
As per the subject: I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is unbearably slow (being on a laptop). What would be the best solution to back up w

[gentoo-user] WARNING: net.ppp0 not under our control, aborting

2008-04-17 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, on boot I get (with baselayout-2.0.0/openrc) the message * Bringing up interface ppp0 * Starting pppd in ppp0 ... [ ok ] * received address 87.67.162.56 * WARNING: net.ppp0 not under our control, aborting What does that mean and what can I do about it? I think I've followed the bas

[gentoo-user] you have cruft in /proc remove it

2008-04-17 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, does anybody know where the message you have cruft in /proc remove it comes from and what to do about it. (It seems to be new with baselayout-2.0.0/openrc but it's not mentioned in the upgrade guide) Many thanks for a hint, Helmut Jarausch Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik RWTH - Aachen

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > > unpleasant surprises. > > Because you didn't read the elog messages. it is still not ok to remove /etc/

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread forgottenwizard
On 16:03 Thu 17 Apr , Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? > > Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) > > /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Andrés Becerra Sandoval
On 4/17/08, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? > > Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) > > /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (

Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some > unpleasant surprises. Because you didn't read the elog messages. > Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? Yes, and emerge tells you to read it: You should now

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: > Overclocking when done properly, is very safe. There are TONS of sites > out there to help with the research. I know that sites. And a lot of ocing results in strange and hidden problems. Add to that my hatred for people RMA'ing boards until t

[gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises

2008-04-17 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some unpleasant surprises. Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ? Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently) /etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc/rc.conf ?) /etc/conf.d/net seems to have gone this inhibited my

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

2008-04-17 Thread Dan Cowsill
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I received my RMAed motherboard back from MSI today, and although it > powered right on, the BIOS wouldn't post unless I disconnected the > CDROM drive and used a different CPU. I had been overclocking an > AMD64 X2 but luckily

[gentoo-user] Re: OT: envelop printing

2008-04-17 Thread James
Peter Ruskin dsl.pipex.com> writes: > Open Office can do all that. I already tried that, so I must be missing some info ? james -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

2008-04-17 Thread Chris Brennan
Overclocking when done properly, is very safe. There are TONS of sites out there to help with the research. And there are an equal ammount of hardware that can safely support Overclocking. So word from the wise (trial and error wise), take your time, do your research and always take baby steps. >

Re: [gentoo-user] [Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown] another dead email address

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote: > Has anybody else who recently posted to the list gotten an email bounce > for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

2008-04-17 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote: > Roy Wright wrote: > | Grant wrote: > |>> An oc'ed cpu needs a lot more power&generates a lot more heat. Both > > can damage > > |>> the CPU AND the mobo (too much power might fry a regulator, or cook > > a cap). > > |>> Or it might overload the P

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daft colours in knode

2008-04-17 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 10:29:09 Michael Schmarck wrote: > Peter Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just installed knode to see how Usenet has changed since I first > > used it 15 years ago, and I'm astonished to find that the default > > colours include white text on a white backgroun

Re: [gentoo-user] ck8s ethernet support in 2.6.23-r6 kernel

2008-04-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote: > Never was a card. This is an on-board ethernet, just > as previously. More background: this is a new mobo and > new video card but the same cpu. And the same installation? So as far as the system is concerned, you have changed the n

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox: password field

2008-04-17 Thread Dan Farrell
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:59:46 -0300 Norberto Bensa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ubuntu patch indeed. For those interested: > ... Thanks for the source overview -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list