On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:47:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
What gets me is this, I even did a fresh install on another hard
drive, it don't work there either. hal and friends were included
from the very start of the install too. Either I am missing
something that is not in the
Keith Dart wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:47:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
What gets me is this, I even did a fresh install on another hard
drive, it don't work there either. hal and friends were included
from the very start of the install too. Either I am missing
something
On Saturday 11 July 2009 02:27:09 Alan E. Davis wrote:
I live on a tropical island. I've been going through about all the
suggestions people have made and all the ideas I can think of.
I have an ancient laptop here that used to lock up in the middle of large
compilations, and eventually I
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 17:13:16 daid kahl wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on upgrading a very old Gentoo system for my work.
Some software is only running well in 2.4.x kernels, and when doing other
updates I inadvertently updated past glibc-2.3.5, and so now the 2.4
kernel
does not
Dale wrote:
Hi folks.
Word of warning. I been upset before, I have even been mad before,
right now, I'm pissed. This is not normal for me but it is what it is.
I tried the new xorg with the hal flag turned on. Let's just say it was
a nightmare, AGAIN. I want my old way back to say it
Hi again,
I got my card reader running:
~# lspci
[...]
09:01.1 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro
Host Adapter (rev 22)
09:01.2 System peripheral: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C843 MMC Host Controller (rev 12)
09:01.3 System peripheral: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C592 Memory Stick Bus Host
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:16:26 +1000, lngn...@gmail.com wrote:
In grub, it is located first as hd1 (/dev/sdb) and then as
/dev/sda5. That is where I want it to be.
Those are two different things. the first is GRUB's root directory, the
place where is will find its configuration and stage files
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:16:26 +1000, lngn...@gmail.com wrote:
In grub, it is located first as hd1 (/dev/sdb) and then as
/dev/sda5. That is where I want it to be.
Those are two different things. the first is GRUB's
On Monday 06 July 2009, Willie Wong wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:07:23PM +0100, Penguin Lover Mick squawked:
from Cacti forums):
| grep -v NaN | grep 'row' | tr e ' ' \
| awk {'print Q$2qcq$3qcq$9Q'} \
| tr Q '' | tr c ',' | tr q ''
Haven't tested it, but looks like it
Alan E. Davis writes:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:16:26 +1000, lngn...@gmail.com wrote:
In grub, it is located first as hd1 (/dev/sdb) and then as
/dev/sda5. That is where I want it to be.
Those are two different
Hi!
Currently I have xorg-server-1.6.1.901-r4 - as far as all newer ones don't
work for me (I mean GL-related things with my intel graphics), while first one
makes my son happy with few GL games. So I have masked all xorg-server
versions which are later rather one currently installed.
Today
Uh. I wrote:
Is there a reason why yo keep having grub on #2? If not, I'd just run
grub, enter
root (hd0,0)
This should be (hd1,0), using the same /boot partition as before.
setup (hd0)
But the master boot record is on the first drive now.
Wonko
On Saturday 11 July 2009 17:57:32 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Hi!
Currently I have xorg-server-1.6.1.901-r4 - as far as all newer ones don't
work for me (I mean GL-related things with my intel graphics), while first
one makes my son happy with few GL games. So I have masked all xorg-server
Find the ebuild in /var/db/pkg/category/package
Thanks, it works - just created Manifest also.
On Saturday 11 July 2009 19:24:35 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Find the ebuild in /var/db/pkg/category/package
Thanks, it works - just created Manifest also.
It's pity that portage doesn't support the .deb concept of pinning. I know you
can always achieve the same effect with masks, but it would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alan,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 07:28:24PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 11 July 2009 19:24:35 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Find the ebuild in /var/db/pkg/category/package
Thanks, it works - just created Manifest also.
It's pity that
On 07/10/2009 08:49 PM, ABCD wrote:
...
Because I'm seeing some strange things in this thread, let me elucidate
as to what the various LANG/LC_* variables do:
LANG
sets the default for LC_*, if unset, defaults to C
LC_CTYPE [charset]
LC_NUMERIC [number format]
LC_TIME [time format]
On Saturday 11 July 2009 20:32:19 William Hubbs wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 07:28:24PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 11 July 2009 19:24:35 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Find the ebuild in /var/db/pkg/category/package
Thanks, it works - just created Manifest also.
pk wrote:
Dale wrote:
Hi folks.
Word of warning. I been upset before, I have even been mad before,
right now, I'm pissed. This is not normal for me but it is what it is.
I tried the new xorg with the hal flag turned on. Let's just say it was
a nightmare, AGAIN. I want my old way
On 07/11/2009 08:08 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Alan E. Davis writes:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:16:26 +1000, lngn...@gmail.com wrote:
In grub, it is located first as hd1 (/dev/sdb) and then as
/dev/sda5. That is where I
On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:35, walt wrote:
On 07/10/2009 08:49 PM, ABCD wrote:
...
Because I'm seeing some strange things in this thread, let me
elucidate
as to what the various LANG/LC_* variables do:
LANG
sets the default for LC_*, if unset, defaults to C
LC_CTYPE [charset]
LC_NUMERIC
=== On Sat, 07/11, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: ===
How to say portage to keep this as is?
===
I always just use /etc/portage/package.mask
e.g.:
media-libs/mesa-7.3-r1
masks anything greater than that version.
(for me, 3D/dri does not work with my Intel chipset (G35) for mesa
greater than that).
On 07/11/2009 01:13 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 07/10/2009 08:49 PM, ABCD wrote:
...
Because I'm seeing some strange things in this thread, let me elucidate
as to what the various LANG/LC_* variables do:
LANG
sets the default for LC_*, if unset, defaults to C
I'm reading this as to *only* set
Keith Dart writes:
=== On Sat, 07/11, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: ===
How to say portage to keep this as is?
I always just use /etc/portage/package.mask
e.g.:
media-libs/mesa-7.3-r1
masks anything greater than that version.
That's what Andrew already did. But now the specific version he
=== On Sat, 07/11, Alex Schuster wrote: ===
That's what Andrew already did. But now the specific version he needs
is no longer in portage, so portage wants to downgrade. Maybe masking
lower versions also would do the trick?
But putting the ebuild into the overlay is the cleanest solution.
===
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:33:36 -0700, walt wrote:
My USB stick, e.g. shows up in grub as (hd2). Now, I can't possibly
think straight enough to know in advance that the USB stick is (hd2),
so what I do every time is to use this trick from the grub prompt:
grub root (hdnow I hit TAB for a list
When you do # tail -f /var/log/messages do you see some sort of report
when you push SysRq.
Yes.
Jul 10 21:17:12 zaphod SysRq : Emergency Sync
Jul 10 21:17:12 zaphod Emergency Sync complete
That's strange; I see nothing. Is there a hotkey number associated
with it as there is for the
Thanks to everyone. I feel like this was so easy, how could I have
been confused? But I was. Somehow, I was lost for weeks between the
ways that Ubuntu and Gentoo handle grub---and I was trying to install
unstable ubuntu with grub 2, so that may explain some of it, but not
all, surely.
I used
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 07:05:27PM -0700, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
A reboot has lost X, in particular the keyboard confuses it. Here is
the beginning of the X log. Unfortunately, I didn't save the previous
working log. This is ~amd64 under 2.6.30-gentoo-r1 and -r2.
I tried many things,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Keith Dartke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:22 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is NOT the way for Linux to make progress in the desktop wars,
folks.
Works for me. ;-)
But its true that Xorg is making some rapid
This has been going on now for months. Is there some reason these two
can't co-exist? Or is there some better fix than just ignoring it or
adding an entry to package.mask?
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a
31 matches
Mail list logo
