Hi,
is it only me or is it well known, that even aufs2-
does not build with a gentoo-sources-2.6.30(-r1-r4) ?
Many thanks for a comment,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany
On 29 Jul 2009, at 19:15, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:20:53 -0700, Grant wrote:
Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from
stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right?
SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure
rates is
less
On 29 Jul 2009, at 16:20, Grant wrote:
...
Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from
stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right?
As I told you before, I used RAID-1 of two conventional olde spinning-
platter hard-drives, using a hardware-RAID SATA controller. An
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Stefan G. Weichingerli...@xunil.at wrote:
Didn't the binary-paths change with 2.6 ?
Yes.
Check if /usr/libexec/amanda/amandad exists and adjust the xinetd-entry
if necessary.
Did that. The binaries exist and xinetd entries point correctly.
(Sorry for
Is cost-savings the advantage of using CF instead of SSD? It sounds
like it might be wiser to spend a little more (low capacity SSD drives
are pretty cheap now) and have a real storage device that doesn't need
an adapter and is much faster, can swap, etc.
I assumed that you're looking at
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:17:26 -0700, Grant wrote:
OK, that's right. How can I find out if 4GB RAM (the current amount)
is enough? From what I understand of how Linux handles memory, it
will fill it up as quickly as possible, and then free it as necessary.
This makes it difficult to
Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from
stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right?
SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure rates is
less reliable. What's wrong with using RAID-1? It's proven technology and
totally resistant to a single
OK, that's right. How can I find out if 4GB RAM (the current amount)
is enough? From what I understand of how Linux handles memory, it
will fill it up as quickly as possible, and then free it as necessary.
This makes it difficult to determine how much RAM is necessary from
watching top.
On Thursday 30 July 2009 14:17:26 Grant wrote:
OK, that's right. How can I find out if 4GB RAM (the current amount)
is enough? From what I understand of how Linux handles memory, it
will fill it up as quickly as possible, and then free it as necessary.
This makes it difficult to determine
Grant writes:
From what I understand of how Linux handles memory, it
will fill it up as quickly as possible, and then free it as necessary.
This makes it difficult to determine how much RAM is necessary from
watching top.
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
OK, that's right. How can I find out if 4GB RAM (the current amount)
is enough? From what I understand of how Linux handles memory, it
will fill it up as quickly as possible, and then free it as necessary.
This makes it difficult to determine how much RAM is necessary from
watching top.
Grant writes:
Sounds good. Will commenting the swap line out of /etc/fstab and
rebooting disable swap?
Yes. Or, temporarily, the 'swapoff' command.
In order to resize the root partition to
include the swap paritition, I'll have to boot to LiveCD right?
I think it might work without. If
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Grantemailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think
it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD?
I have no swap and things
On Thursday 30 July 2009 15:47:18 Grant wrote:
Not true. I have machines with zero swap and they work just fine. I am
utterly unconcerned with out of memory conditions as whether you have
swap or not, when virtual memory runs out, either way you have a horrible
cockup that is hard to fix.
Hi Folks !
Somebody know how I to so send mail with IP and Date/time when same
user login on shell ( remote or local ) ?
I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access and
for what my server to do something, I try log but this can be erased
and maybe mail can
On Thursday 30 July 2009 14:47:18 Grant wrote:
Sounds good. Will commenting the swap line out of /etc/fstab and
rebooting disable swap?
I'd also recompile the kernel with CONFIG_SWAP=n.
--
Rgds
Peter
Sounds good. Will commenting the swap line out of /etc/fstab and
rebooting disable swap?
Yes. Or, temporarily, the 'swapoff' command.
In order to resize the root partition to
include the swap paritition, I'll have to boot to LiveCD right?
I think it might work without. If you have
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:57:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
If your partition table is laid out with the swap partition directly
after the root partition, you can delete both, recreate the root
partition the same size as both together. The new root partition must
start where the old one did.
On Thursday 30 July 2009 17:45:30 Grant wrote:
Sounds good. Will commenting the swap line out of /etc/fstab and
rebooting disable swap?
Yes. Or, temporarily, the 'swapoff' command.
In order to resize the root partition to
include the swap paritition, I'll have to boot to LiveCD
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think
it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD?
I have no swap and things work just fine. (8 gigs of RAM)
Obviously, running without swap
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Grantemailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think
it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD?
I have no swap and things
I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a
tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think
it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD?
I have no swap and things work just fine. (8 gigs of RAM)
Obviously, running without swap
2009/7/30 Vagner Rodrigues vag...@litrixlinux.org:
Hi Folks !
Somebody know how I to so send mail with IP and Date/time when same
user login on shell ( remote or local ) ?
I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access and
for what my server to do something,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mike Mazur mma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I have an nVidia card, and I can use the NVIDIA X Server Settings app
to dynamically detect and configure displays I connect to my laptop.
When I'm done with the configuration, I simply apply it, and keep on
Vagner Rodrigues vag...@litrixlinux.org writes:
Hi Folks !
Somebody know how I to so send mail with IP and Date/time when same
user login on shell ( remote or local ) ?
I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access and
for what my server to do something, I
On Friday 31 July 2009 00:05:16 Harry Putnam wrote:
Somebody know how I to so send mail with IP and Date/time when same
user login on shell ( remote or local ) ?
I work with another admin's and I never told me when they access and
for what my server to do something, I try log
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:44, Fernando Antunesfs.antu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't use xorg.conf in my notebook Lenovo T61, Intel 965GSM , xorg and
xfce ~x86, gentoo 2.6.30 with KMS, anymore.
Both kernel and X switch to 1280x800 resolution automatically, xinerama is
disable.
Mike Mazur wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:44, Fernando Antunesfs.antu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't use xorg.conf in my notebook Lenovo T61, Intel 965GSM , xorg and
xfce ~x86, gentoo 2.6.30 with KMS, anymore.
Both kernel and X switch to 1280x800 resolution automatically, xinerama
28 matches
Mail list logo
