Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Dale
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:44 -0600, Dale wrote: ... Another situation I was thinking about. Let's say it is as secure as they CLAIM it to be. If someone stole my puter, I could go to lostpass and change the master password o

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Dale
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:29 + Stroller wrote: Everyone's yakking it up because it makes them look clever. Either that, or they're 'yakking it up' in hopes of discouraging a regular user here from taking an amazi

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread »Q«
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:44:48 -0600 Dale wrote: > So, another question. Is there a tool that is local and would do > something like this? I am using Seamonkey 2.0 nowadays. It seems to > have some tools available to it that the old Seamonkey doesn't. I don't know of a tool with browser integ

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread William Kenworthy
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 20:44 -0600, Dale wrote: ... > Another situation I was thinking about. Let's say it is as secure as > they CLAIM it to be. If someone stole my puter, I could go to lostpass > and change the master password or just close the account. Then even my > computer would be usele

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread »Q«
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:49:29 + Stroller wrote: > Everyone's yakking it up because it makes them look clever. Either that, or they're 'yakking it up' in hopes of discouraging a regular user here from taking an amazing risk with his banking access passwords. > The "Why LastPass is safe" page

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Dale
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On 28 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Dale wrote: ... And to think I came here to ask others opinion BEFORE doing this. I was curious as to how this could work myself and if they can be trusted, or SHOULD be trusted. Seems everyone thin

Re: [gentoo-user] eclipse portage package

2009-11-28 Thread Marcus Wanner
On 11/28/2009 3:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: Several comments about answers here. First, to Marcus Wanner, yes, the first two eclipse packages work for 3.5, but they AREN'T eclipse, they are plugins for eclipse (plugins for what I really want). The 3rd is eclipse-sdk, the only one you don't cover

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Stroller
On 28 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Dale wrote: ... And to think I came here to ask others opinion BEFORE doing this. I was curious as to how this could work myself and if they can be trusted, or SHOULD be trusted. Seems everyone thinks no one should. Everyone's yakking it up because it makes the

[gentoo-user] fsck won't work if ac cord not attached?!

2009-11-28 Thread Maxim Wexler
Hi group, When my netbook boots under battery power w/o the ac adapter connected I get this warning msg in the boot window: 'Skipping fsck due to not being an ac adapter'. Chaos ensues. The warning appears in /etc/init.d/fsck. How do I fix this? Some option in /etc/conf.d/fsck? If you look for

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread BRM
- Original Message From: Alan McKinnon > On Saturday 28 November 2009 18:31:04 BRM wrote: > > I do have sources for linux kernel 2.6.30-gentoo-r8 available, but then I > > need to be able to write to the read-only fs. Guess I could probably do > > that using the kernel command-line, n

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Marcus Wanner
On 11/28/2009 5:03 PM, Dale wrote: chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: [about LastPass] What I find incredible is that people will accept the site'

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Mick
On Saturday 28 November 2009 19:42:33 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote: > > > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate, > > > as many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But > > > that causes the same app to

Re: [gentoo-user] SPDIF with dmix [Was: Phonon concurrent access on device]

2009-11-28 Thread Florian Philipp
Miroslav Flídr schrieb: > Florian Philipp napsal(a): >> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem >> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I >> start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while >> Amarok runs but is idle) th

Re: [gentoo-user] eth1 won't start [solved]

2009-11-28 Thread Roger Mason
Hello John, John Lowry writes: > If you have only the two cards installed you can delete > everything except for the first entry and the one referencing the card > currently in the machine and change name to "eth1." So: > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:2a:7b", > N

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Dale
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: [about LastPass] What I find incredible is that people will accept the site's say-so that the site admins can'

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:06:59 -0800 (PST) BRM wrote: ...[snip]... > Either way, I need to figure out how to get read-access to the root > partition again. Any advice on either of the above (or other > options), and more importantly (since any options depend on it) how > to get read-write access to

Re: [gentoo-user] eclipse portage package

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:18:06 Chuck Robey wrote: > Alan McKinnon's response, below, seems to be telling me that I really > should go ahead and try to use the binary from the eclipse site, and not > to worry about getting into dependency problems with portage. Normally, > most package to

Re: [gentoo-user] How to install package without dependencies?

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:16:17 Jarry wrote: > Hi, > > Subject says it all: I'd like to install a certain package > but without its dependencies. No matter what ebuild says, > I want to install just this package and nothing more. Did you even try to read the emerge man page? Obviously not,

[gentoo-user] OS inaccessable after brief uptime in X

2009-11-28 Thread Harry Putnam
I keep having a problem where the OS becomes inaccessable after running in X for a while. I haven't noticed a time pattern yet but it doesn't take long sometimes. Today I started from an OFF machine, booted up, started X did a few things A few minutes later I attempted to login via ssh from a re

Re: [gentoo-user] eclipse portage package

2009-11-28 Thread Chuck Robey
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wednesday 25 November 2009 19:20:43 Chuck Robey wrote: >> I need to get an up-to-date version of eclipse working on my gentoo >> box. First question is, is there a Galileo (3.5+) version of eclipse >> available as a portage package? I can't find it, so I'd really appre

[gentoo-user] How to install package without dependencies?

2009-11-28 Thread Jarry
Hi, Subject says it all: I'd like to install a certain package but without its dependencies. No matter what ebuild says, I want to install just this package and nothing more. And I'd like to have this package excluded from all future dependency-checks (like revdep-rebuild). How could I do it? J

Re: [gentoo-user] Phonon concurrent access on device

2009-11-28 Thread Miroslav Flídr
Florian Philipp napsal(a): > I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem > that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I > start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while > Amarok runs but is idle) the second application reports t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 21:32:28 Mick wrote: > > I suppose one could make several useful -meta packages DEPEND on kate, as > > many users want kate and do not want the entire kdesdk package. But that > > causes the same app to appear in more than one -meta package and the > > devs seem to wa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Mick
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:22:14 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote: > > > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct > > > portage tool: > > > > > > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate > > > * Searching for kate ... > > > k

Re: [gentoo-user] Phonon concurrent access on device

2009-11-28 Thread Florian Philipp
Alan McKinnon schrieb: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:58:42 Florian Philipp wrote: >> Hi list! >> >> I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem >> that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I >> start a second app (for example playing a video wi

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:59:38 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote: >> >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] eth1 won't start

2009-11-28 Thread John Lowry
Roger Mason wrote: Hello John & Walt, Thanks for the responses. Here is the information you asked for. John Lowry writes: What is the contents of your /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules # PCI device 0x10b7:0x9200 (3c59x) SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 18:31:04 BRM wrote: > - Original Message > > From: Alan McKinnon > > > On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote: > > > > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical > > > > disk. Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual

Re: [gentoo-user] eth1 won't start

2009-11-28 Thread Roger Mason
Hello John & Walt, Thanks for the responses. Here is the information you asked for. John Lowry writes: > What is the contents of your /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules # PCI device 0x10b7:0x9200 (3c59x) SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:01:03:c5:2a:7b", NAME="eth0"

[gentoo-user] gcc-4.4.2 stabilization, where have the bug tracker gone?

2009-11-28 Thread pk
Subject pretty much says it all. I'm just wondering where it went... I've tried searching on b.g.o. and google but to no avail (my "google-fu" may be limited). Does any one know? Best regards Peter K

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread BRM
- Original Message From: Alan McKinnon > On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote: > > > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical disk. > > > Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual module setup, your > > > disks will be /dev/sda. Do you have

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 17:04:10 BRM wrote: > > You also mention /dev/hda and the context implies it is a physical disk. > > Unless you have ancient disk hardware and unusual module setup, your > > disks will be /dev/sda. Do you have references to /dev/dh** in > > /etc/fstab? That won;t work

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread BRM
- Original Message From: Alan McKinnon On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:06:59 BRM wrote: > > During boot, udevd (version 146, btw) complains about "error getting > > signalfd". I did some basic hunting and this seems to have been a big > > problem over the last year. I'm running kernel

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Markus Schönhaber
28.11.2009 04:50, »Q«: > They claim that the decrypted data never leaves your computer and they > they don't have a key to it. Many, many things aren't clear, such as > what kind of encryption is used (same as the US gov't uses for "Top > Secret" stuff, they say, heh), That reminds me of the fa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 02:01:22 Mick wrote: > > To find out what depends on kate, kweather and kfloppy, use the correct > > portage tool: > > > > a...@nazgul ~ $ equery depends -a kate > > * Searching for kate ... > > kde-base/kdesdk-meta-4.3.1 (>=kde-base/kate-4.3.1:4.3[kdeprefix=]) > > kd

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Seamonkey and LastPass

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:50:42 »Q« wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:57:54 +0200 > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > [about LastPass] > > > What I find incredible is that people will accept the site's say-so > > that the site admins can't read the data. They have not proven > > anything, merely asse

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 06:06:59 BRM wrote: > So, I have been running my laptop for quite a while with the current > software - it's been well over a week since I last synced and installed > software - when I upgraded to KDE4; and I do believe I've rebooted several > times since. > > Today

Re: [gentoo-user] Phonon concurrent access on device

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:58:42 Florian Philipp wrote: > Hi list! > > I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem > that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I > start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while > Amarok ru

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:59:38 Jörg Schaible wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote: > >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except > >> >> for I have to manually rem

Re: [gentoo-user] udev broken...

2009-11-28 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 20:06 -0800, BRM wrote: [... way too much background info removed] BREVITY! We don't want to have to read about what you had on your sandwich for lunch or the fight you had with your girl to get to the meat of what you're trying to say ;-). Since you didn't paste the link t

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal

2009-11-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote: >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except >> >> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages. >> >> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there

[gentoo-user] Phonon concurrent access on device

2009-11-28 Thread Florian Philipp
Hi list! I recently updated one of my systems to KDE4. Now I have the problem that only one application can access the audio output at a time. If I start a second app (for example playing a video with Kaffeine while Amarok runs but is idle) the second application reports that the device "does not