I'm hoping to use a Pandaboard ES ARM SoC as the host system in the
office where only light web browsing is required.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=4chap=9
I've installed Gentoo on a couple of Beaglebones. Being a
source-based distro, ARM support on Gentoo is
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
Please disable
Since this is a ebuild, I'm not filing a bugzilla bug. Note that
www-client/uxbl-2012.05.14 built OK. Apparently, the latest git sources
have some features I really want, that are not in any of the other
ebuilds. So I'm trying to build it. The build first pulled down
and installed
I've been getting a kernel oops for awhile that is worse than ever in
3.11.1. It seems to be related to my XHCI USB port. I followed the
instructions here:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Kernel_Crash_Dumps
but /proc/vmcore doesn't exist after I reboot the system after a
crash. I did notice
Arrgh; forgot to attach the log. Here it is.
--
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
I don't run desktop environments; I run useful applications
buildlog.txt.gz
Description: Binary data
On 25/09/2013 09:33, Walter Dnes wrote:
Since this is a ebuild, I'm not filing a bugzilla bug. Note that
www-client/uxbl-2012.05.14 built OK. Apparently, the latest git sources
have some features I really want, that are not in any of the other
ebuilds. So I'm trying to build it. The
Greetings fellow Gentooistas,
at the moment I am doing some testing and evaluating of Btrfs on my own
system. Why? Just because I can and I am curious about it.
Because I am doing that for evaluation purpose please don't give advise
like go ZFS or something like that, thank you.
Kernel is
On 25/09/13 16:54, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Greetings fellow Gentooistas,
at the moment I am doing some testing and evaluating of Btrfs on my own
system. Why? Just because I can and I am curious about it.
Because I am doing that for evaluation purpose please don't give advise
like go ZFS or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared.
want it back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared.
want it back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will occur.
The kern.log shows INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0}
(detected by 1, t=10002 jiffies, g=18446744073709551325,
c=18446744073709551324, q=13).
When this happen on boot,the kernel seems hung and will take
On 25/09/2013 12:56, 东方巽雷 wrote:
My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will occur.
The kern.log shows INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0}
(detected by 1, t=10002 jiffies, g=18446744073709551325,
c=18446744073709551324, q=13).
When this happen on
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared.
want it back
autounmask should disappear. It's a bad idea, because it *creates* single
version (=) unmasked packages that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/25/13 16:42, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask
disappeared. want it back
autounmask should
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:12:06PM +0400, the wrote:
On 09/25/13 16:42, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote:
emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask
disappeared. want it back
autounmask should disappear. It's a bad idea, because it
Yes,I have search some webpages.But not sure if this question can be solved
and how to be solved.
2013/9/25 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
On 25/09/2013 12:56, 东方巽雷 wrote:
My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will
occur.
The kern.log shows INFO:
On 25/09/2013 16:31, 东方巽雷 wrote:
Yes,I have search some webpages.But not sure if this question can be
solved and how to be solved.
But did you read THAT page in the kernel docs?
p.s. 2 things,
- please do not top-post
- please do not post in HTML
2013/9/25 Alan McKinnon
I'm trying to reduce the number of systems I spend time managing. My
previous plan was to set up multiseat on a small number of systems.
Now I'm wondering if it would be better to use multiple systems with
identical hardware and manage them in some sort of an optimized way so
that each set of
On 25/09/2013 23:18, Grant wrote:
I'm trying to reduce the number of systems I spend time managing. My
previous plan was to set up multiseat on a small number of systems.
Now I'm wondering if it would be better to use multiple systems with
identical hardware and manage them in some sort of an
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys-apps/systemd-204
would do it. But this failed (see below)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
That looks like a horrible bug in the ebuild - it's trying to install to
the live filesystem. ebuilds install to the work directory in
/var/tmp/portage/ and the merge phase moves the files over to /usr.
You can either file a
On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, walt wrote:
On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:00 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2
28 matches
Mail list logo
