Hi,
I tried to run openvswitch 2.0.0 in a virtualbox-guest-vm.
I ran emerge --config after the installation to generate an empty database.
I start ovsdb-server all is fine.
I start ovs-vswitchd all is fine.
However as soon as I try to configure something ie add a bridge ovs-vswitchd
runs at 100%
In 539ac51b.7060...@wraeth.id.au wra...@wraeth.id.au (wraeth) writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/06/14 19:13, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
There was a thread here a few days ago.
For reference:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/275153
Thanks, that
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc +firmware-loader gudev
introspection +kmod selinux static-libs ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64
x32}
Installed versions: 208^t{tbz2}(03:30:13 PM 12/08/2013)(acl
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc
+firmware-loader gudev introspection +kmod selinux static-libs
ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64 x32}
Installed versions:
Thanks Alan, but...
On 6/14/2014 10:16 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
This clearly shows the -openrc USE flag being applied.
You read it wrong. The USE flag is not being applied it's being removed
(the minus -),
Well, I did include
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, that explains the meaning of the (), but doesn't explain this *change*
satisfactorily (to a non-coder at least)...
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read the ChangeLog for
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read the ChangeLog for sys-fs/udev, specifically the entry on 03 Apr 2014.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Still, for those of us who actually look at what is about to happen, and
notice a change like this that could potentially cause boot problems
(udev+openrc), it would be nice.
I think it makes more sense to limit news
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed previously?
Read
On Tuesday 10 Jun 2014 16:44:41 Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 06/07/2014 06:33 AM, Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 03 Jun 2014 15:16:56 Stroller wrote:
On Tue, 3 June 2014, at 6:59 am, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
… status-left [#S] … status-right #22T %H:%M %d-%b-%y
It looks to me like I've
On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/14/2014 2:15 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 6/14/2014 1:02 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have files we never
use.
Hate to break the news to you, but by your definition you're
enforced to have thousands of files you never use on
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have files we never
use.
Hate to break the news to you, but by
Howdy,
I can't figure out a way around this one. Usually keywording, maybe
that should be unkeywording, a newer version works but doesn't seem to
in this case. This started as part of a emerge -uvaDN world.
Error I get:
WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
# genlop -t www-client/firefox
* www-client/firefox
Sat Dec 18 17:19:14 2010 www-client/firefox-3.6.13
merge
On Tuesday 10 Jun 2014 11:43:31 thegeezer wrote:
I used to really like ifplugd. mostly for the audible beep when things
are disconnected as it's easier to diagnose from afar.
What audible beep? Am I missing some obscure configuration variable on my
systems?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
On 15/06/2014 00:20, Mick wrote:
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
# genlop -t www-client/firefox
* www-client/firefox
Sat Dec 18 17:19:14 2010
On 14/06/2014 23:23, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I can't figure out a way around this one. Usually keywording, maybe
that should be unkeywording, a newer version works but doesn't seem to
in this case. This started as part of a emerge -uvaDN world.
Error I get:
WARNING: One or more
On 14/06/2014 16:31, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks Alan, but...
On 6/14/2014 10:16 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
This clearly shows the -openrc USE flag being applied.
You read it wrong. The USE flag is not being applied it's being removed
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is *always in the ebuild and Changelog.
Sometimes it's on Google too, but that is unreliable.
In general the stance is supposed to be that if it doesn't have a news
item, it shouldn't be a high-impact
I'm at a loss to explain why this is a good idea or desirable:
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
=net-libs/gupnp-0.18[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?]
has unmet requirements.
- net-libs/gupnp-0.20.12-r1::gentoo USE=introspection
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Look closely at the deps. You don't have a blocker, you have a
conflict. Your version of openjpeg is OK, the sub-slot operators are
not. What's the result of eix openjpeg?
I get this:
root@fireball / # eix openjpeg
[U] media-libs/openjpeg
Available versions:
On 06/14/2014 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
media-libs/openjpeg:0
(media-libs/openjpeg-1.5.1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
conflicts with
=media-libs/openjpeg-1.3-r2:0[abi_x86_64(-)] required by
(media-video/ffmpeg-2.2.3-r1:0/52.55.55::gentoo, installed)
The multilib stuff is a
John Campbell wrote:
On 06/14/2014 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
media-libs/openjpeg:0
(media-libs/openjpeg-1.5.1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
conflicts with
=media-libs/openjpeg-1.3-r2:0[abi_x86_64(-)] required by
(media-video/ffmpeg-2.2.3-r1:0/52.55.55::gentoo, installed)
On 06/14/14 23:39, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[snip]
It means that openrc users should strongly consider migrate to eudev.
I use eudev since its beta and never had any issue, nor systemd
leaking into my system. And in addition add the following at
make.conf, as it seems that we are enforced to have
On 06/14/2014 07:10 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't have a env directory in /etc/portage and there is no
openjpeg-1.3-r2 available in the tree. I sort of think I know what you
are talking about tho. I need to create that directory structure for
openjpeg-1.4-r1 and put ABI_X86=32 x32 in the file.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
INSTALL_MASK=/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd
/usr/lib/systemd /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/systemd /etc/systemd
Warning to the reader: Please do not copy/paste this particular
INSTALL_MASK setting. It may work
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:20:40PM +0100, Mick wrote
I looked at how long some packages are taking these days. I noticed that
firefox and chromium take a lot longer to emerge than was the case 3-4 years
ago. For example:
[...deletia...]
I am wondering if something in my configuration is
John Campbell wrote:
On 06/14/2014 07:10 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't have a env directory in /etc/portage and there is no
openjpeg-1.3-r2 available in the tree. I sort of think I know what you
are talking about tho. I need to create that directory structure for
openjpeg-1.4-r1 and put
30 matches
Mail list logo
