[gentoo-user] Re: libav/ffmpeg handling via gloabl USE

2015-02-01 Thread »Q«
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 04:45:34 +0100 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > What is the (technical) reason for makeing libav the default instead > of ffmpeg? has some info about the decision, though I'

[gentoo-user] libav/ffmpeg handling via gloabl USE

2015-02-01 Thread Meino . Cramer
Hi, this is *NO* complaint/critsim neither implicitely nor explicitely! I am just curious... ;) What is the (technical) reason for makeing libav the default instead of ffmpeg? Best regards, Meino

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:35 PM, wrote: > Am Sonntag, 01.02.2015 um 16:31 > schrieb walt : > >> For example, I had to add the rpcbind.service to the multi-user >> systemd target because even nfs3 seems to need it. (I knew when I > > I never used systemd, so I don't know if adding the rpcbind.servi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread wabenbau
Am Sonntag, 01.02.2015 um 16:31 schrieb walt : > For example, I had to add the rpcbind.service to the multi-user > systemd target because even nfs3 seems to need it. (I knew when I I never used systemd, so I don't know if adding the rpcbind.service to the multi-user systemd target is also startin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread wabenbau
Am Sonntag, 01.02.2015 um 16:31 schrieb walt : > Thanks wabe. I forgot to mention that I use systemd now, and I've > had to work out a few problems with nfs over past months because our > gentoo systemd scripts are lagging a bit behind upstream, which is > not surprising. > > For example, I had

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread wabenbau
Am Montag, 02.02.2015 um 00:12 schrieb Neil Bothwick : > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 00:32:34 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > #mount.nfs a6://usr/portage /usr/portage -o nfsvers=3 hangs > > > indefinitely until I hit Ctrl-C. If I then repeat the same > > > command immediately the mount succeeds

[gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread walt
On 02/01/2015 03:32 PM, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > Am Sonntag, 01.02.2015 um 14:41 > schrieb walt : > >> On 02/01/2015 01:18 PM, walt wrote: >>> I was happy with nfs3 until it stopped working for reasons I still >>> don't understand :( >> >> Well, nfs3 still works, but only after failing on the f

Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-02-01 Thread Adam Carter
> > >> > Do they need telnet or ssh access, > >> > > Not telnet shell but this could be triggered with telnet/nc or even nmap, > hping, or tcpreplay - all of which could send an arbitrary payload to tcp > or udp ports. > For clarity, its probably best to specify if we're talking about client or ser

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 00:32:34 +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote: > > #mount.nfs a6://usr/portage /usr/portage -o nfsvers=3 hangs > > indefinitely until I hit Ctrl-C. If I then repeat the same command > > immediately the mount succeeds. This is the mysterious nfs black > > magic I've run into many t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread wabenbau
Am Sonntag, 01.02.2015 um 14:41 schrieb walt : > On 02/01/2015 01:18 PM, walt wrote: > > I was happy with nfs3 until it stopped working for reasons I still > > don't understand :( > > Well, nfs3 still works, but only after failing on the first attempt: > > #mount.nfs a6://usr/portage /usr/portag

[gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread walt
On 02/01/2015 01:18 PM, walt wrote: > I was happy with nfs3 until it stopped working for reasons I still don't > understand :( Well, nfs3 still works, but only after failing on the first attempt: #mount.nfs a6://usr/portage /usr/portage -o nfsvers=3 hangs indefinitely until I hit Ctrl-C. If I t

Re: [gentoo-user] cannot emerge dev-qt/qtcore, undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

2015-02-01 Thread Justin Findlay
On 02/01/2015 01:44 PM, Justin Findlay wrote: > On 01/13/2015 06:51 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Justin Findlay wrote: >>> I am having a problem emerging dev-qt/qtcore that I have been unable to >>> solve myself yet. The system is amd64 and I have ABI_X86='32 64' s

[gentoo-user] [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)

2015-02-01 Thread walt
Everybody's favoritest cuddly FOSS personality Theo de Raadt is quoted in Wikipedia as saying: "NFS4 is not on our roadmap. It's a horribly bloated protocol that they keep adding crap to." The latest nfs-utils package demonstrates why he's annoyed with NFS4: This morning I got this when mounting

Re: [gentoo-user] cannot emerge dev-qt/qtcore, undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

2015-02-01 Thread Justin Findlay
On 01/13/2015 06:51 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Justin Findlay wrote: >> I am having a problem emerging dev-qt/qtcore that I have been unable to >> solve myself yet. The system is amd64 and I have ABI_X86='32 64' so >> that pipelight will work. I think the error i

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Alexey Mishustin
> whis were in USE which were in USE

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Alexey Mishustin
02.02.2015 0:24 пользователь "Mike Gilbert" написал: > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Alexey Mishustin wrote: > > 2015-02-01 21:44 GMT+03:00 Matthias Hanft : > >> Hi, > > > > Hello > > > >> I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" > >> told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxex

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Matthias Hanft
I wrote: > > /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-1.2.6-r1/work/ffmpeg-1.2.6/libavcodec/x86/mathops.h:94:1: > error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints The piece of source code at that point: #if HAVE_CMOV #define COPY3_IF_LT(x, y, a, b, c, d)\ __asm__ volatile(\ "cmpl %0, %3 \n

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Alexey Mishustin wrote: > 2015-02-01 21:44 GMT+03:00 Matthias Hanft : >> Hi, > > Hello > >> I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" >> told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" > > "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" isn't telling to turn on all

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Matthias Hanft
Mike Gilbert wrote: > > You failed to include the real error message in your email. Look > further up in the log for a line containing "error:". Ah, I actually missed that: /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-1.2.6-r1/work/ffmpeg-1.2.6/libavcodec/x86/mathops.h:94:1: error: 'asm' operand has imp

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Matthias Hanft wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" > told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" > > When I did "emerge -NDuv @world" afterwards, there were some re-installs. > Everything was fine, except ffmpeg.

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Matthias Hanft wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" > told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" > > When I did "emerge -NDuv @world" afterwards, there were some re-installs. > Everything was fine, except ffmpeg.

Re: [gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Alexey Mishustin
2015-02-01 21:44 GMT+03:00 Matthias Hanft : > Hi, Hello > I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" > told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" isn't telling to turn on all these flags unconditionally but only those that are included in "USE

Re: [gentoo-user] USE-flags description?

2015-02-01 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Jarry wrote: > Hi Gentoo-users, > > where can I find description of *all* USE flags? I checked > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc and use.local.desc but still > I can not find some... > > cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 suggested my CPU_FLAGS_X86 should be: > "aes avx mmx mmxex

[gentoo-user] Cannot reinstall ffmpeg since new cpu flags

2015-02-01 Thread Matthias Hanft
Hi, I have installed the new CPU_FLAGS_X86, as "cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86" told me: CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" When I did "emerge -NDuv @world" afterwards, there were some re-installs. Everything was fine, except ffmpeg. emerge displays: [ebuild R] media-video/ffmpeg-1.2.6-r1 USE

Re: [gentoo-user] USE-flags description?

2015-02-01 Thread Jarry
On 01-Feb-15 18:53, Markos Chandras wrote: where can I find description of *all* USE flags? I checked /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc and use.local.desc but still I can not find some... try /usr/portage/desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc You probably mean /usr/portage/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc Th

Re: [gentoo-user] USE-flags description?

2015-02-01 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/01/2015 05:36 PM, Jarry wrote: > Hi Gentoo-users, > > where can I find description of *all* USE flags? I checked > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc and use.local.desc but still I can > not find some... > > cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 suggested my CPU

[gentoo-user] USE-flags description?

2015-02-01 Thread Jarry
Hi Gentoo-users, where can I find description of *all* USE flags? I checked /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc and use.local.desc but still I can not find some... cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 suggested my CPU_FLAGS_X86 should be: "aes avx mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3" But I'd like to

Re: [gentoo-user] meld - GConf Error: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS

2015-02-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 01 February 2015 18:00:23 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 01/02/2015 17:07, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I think of it simply like this: "su" switches user, and that's all; "su > > -" gives you the full environment of the user you switch to. > > Indeed, that is the heart of it. > > Your version

Re: [gentoo-user] meld - GConf Error: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS

2015-02-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 01/02/2015 17:07, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 01 February 2015 14:17:04 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 01/02/2015 02:18, Adam Carter wrote: >>> If you've su'd to root, try 'su -' instead. >>> >>> Thank you, that was it? >>> What difference does it make and why on some bo

Re: [gentoo-user] meld - GConf Error: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS

2015-02-01 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 01 February 2015 14:17:04 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 01/02/2015 02:18, Adam Carter wrote: > > If you've su'd to root, try 'su -' instead. > > > > Thank you, that was it? > > What difference does it make and why on some boxes it has to be "su > > -" and on others

[gentoo-user] Smart 'eclean packages'?

2015-02-01 Thread Grant
Do we have an eclean option that will consider how long ago a package was uninstalled? Last I checked this didn't exist yet. - Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-02-01 Thread Grant
>> glsa-check is working fine, it was a slotted issue. Still curious >> about a way to check for statically linked packages. > > There is no simple solution for this... USE flags static and > static-libs handle cases where there is a choice between static and > non-static version. In theory it is

Re: [gentoo-user] meld - GConf Error: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS

2015-02-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 01/02/2015 02:18, Adam Carter wrote: > > If you've su'd to root, try 'su -' instead. > > > Thank you, that was it? > What difference does it make and why on some boxes it has to be "su > -" and on others simple "su" works. > > > Read 'man su'. I dont really understand

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z MB

2015-02-01 Thread Mick
On Sunday 01 Feb 2015 11:16:20 Dan Johansson wrote: > I just got me a new MB, a ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z, after my old MB > fried due to a fan failure. > > Is anyone else (on this list) using this MB, with Gentoo of cause? > If you are, have you got all the sensors working? > I can not get infor

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z MB

2015-02-01 Thread bitlord
On Sunday, February 01, 2015 12:16:20 PM Dan Johansson wrote: > I just got me a new MB, a ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z, after my old MB > fried due to a fan failure. > > Is anyone else (on this list) using this MB, with Gentoo of cause? > If you are, have you got all the sensors working? > I can not

Re: [gentoo-user] meld - GConf Error: Client failed to connect to the D-BUS

2015-02-01 Thread Mick
On Sunday 01 Feb 2015 00:18:40 Adam Carter wrote: > > If you've su'd to root, try 'su -' instead. > > > > Thank you, that was it? > > What difference does it make and why on some boxes it has to be "su -" > > and on others simple "su" works. > > Read 'man su'. I dont really understand this stuf

[gentoo-user] [OT] ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z MB

2015-02-01 Thread Dan Johansson
I just got me a new MB, a ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z, after my old MB fried due to a fan failure. Is anyone else (on this list) using this MB, with Gentoo of cause? If you are, have you got all the sensors working? I can not get information from all the sensors on this MB (compared with what the B

Re: [gentoo-user][SOLVED] Computer does not boot

2015-02-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:40:37 -0700, Joseph wrote: > Indeed grub was updated to grub-0.97-r14 > > genlop --list --date 3 days ago |grep grub > Fri Jan 30 23:37:03 2015 >>> sys-boot/grub-0.97-r14 > Sat Jan 31 00:28:04 2015 >>> sys-boot/grub-2.02_beta2-r3 > > Though all my other system we

Re: [gentoo-user] Computer does not boot

2015-02-01 Thread Meino . Cramer
Joseph [15-02-01 10:04]: > On 01/31/15 23:42, Dale wrote: > > [snip] > > > Hi Joseph, > > may be only a accidental coincidence... > One thing I can think of is an empty bios coin cell. > >>>If that battery is flat, the bios will complain settings are gone. > >>>Why would that