Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

> On 21 Aug 2017, at 12:49, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > > I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could really > use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid reading the parts you don't > need to and the "flow" is rather lost. It's an extremely verbose

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: > > > > I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 > > and the response was > > > > dev-lang/ruby > > selected: 2.1.9 > > protected: none > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Mon, Aug 21 2017, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 >> and the response was >> >> dev-lang/ruby >> selected: 2.1.9 >> protected: none >> omitted: 2.2.6 >> >> Am I correct in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 and the response was dev-lang/ruby selected: 2.1.9 protected: none omitted: 2.2.6 Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

On 21 August 2017 20:04:30 GMT+02:00, Rasmus Thomsen wrote: >The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as >in end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers >could be protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't

Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

On Monday, 21 August 2017 12:49:27 BST mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > Any likely problems if i install the stage3 tarball etc. under centos6.6? > tried the live dvd but it has problems with my current graphics card > (framebuffer driver). I haven't tried out installing Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Nameserver lookups fail on virtual server after Kernel upgrade from version 4.9 to 4.12

On Monday, 21 August 2017 11:35:44 BST Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 21.08.2017 08:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Ah, so silentoldconfig is effectively the same as old config. > > Silentoldconfig is quite a useful make target, since it only asks about > newly introduced kernel options. ... and it

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as in end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers could be protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support bottom posting ( well ), at least on mobile devices Rasmus Original Message

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

On Monday, August 21, 2017 6:44:07 PM CEST Dale wrote: > mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the > > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that > > mistake. > > > 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that > mistake. > > -- > Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! > https://tutanota.com > > 21.

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the "subject" line causes confusion.  now i know, now i can avoid that mistake. -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! https://tutanota.com 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by rdalek1...@gmail.com: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Mon, Aug 21 2017, Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:26:49 -0600, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > >> I don't believe that will be enough. You should update RUBY_TARGETS in >> /etc/portage/make.conf if you have it set. If you don't have it set and >> are still getting this error, that's a

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > refering to the amd64 handbook, at gentoo.org "downloading the stage > tarball" where it says " > > > Downloading the stage tarball > > Go to the Gentoo mount point where the root file system is mounted > (most likely /mnt/gentoo): > > |root

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

ok, rereading the part on preparing the drive i see the target partition for the new gentoo root was meant.  no problem. -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! https://tutanota.com 21. Aug 2017 08:47 by mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com: > refering to the

[gentoo-user] Question on install

refering to the amd64 handbook, at gentoo.org  "downloading the stage tarball"  where it says " Downloading the stage tarball Go to the Gentoo mount point where the root file system is mounted (most likely /mnt/gentoo): root #cd /mnt/gentoo" does that mean to change to where gentoo will be

Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

Nice cross posting "fairly experienced at linux" guy... Regards On 08/21/2017 07:49 AM, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: fairly experienced at linux

Re: [gentoo-user] ruby 22

TL;DR: re-sync and you should be fine. On 08/20/2017 12:36 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: Not sure I understand. 1. I should have been more complete about the command I run MAKEOPTS="--jobs=8 --load-average=5" emerge --ask --deep --tree --jobs --load-average=5 \ --update

Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

On 21.08.2017 13:49, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could > really use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid reading the parts > you don't need to and the "flow" is rather lost. It's an extremely > verbose document

[gentoo-user] install under centos606

Any likely problems if i install the stage3 tarball etc. under centos6.6?  tried the live dvd but it has problems with my current graphics card (framebuffer driver).  I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could really use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid

[gentoo-user] media-gfx/hugin-2017.0 builds no /usr/bin/hugin

Hi, if I emerge media-gfx/hugin with ~amd64 it builds and installs media-gfx/hugin-2017.0 without any errors. But after that it's missing /usr/bin/hugin. Building media-gfx/hugin-2016.2.0 works. Is this a known problem? kind regards Wolfgang

Re: [gentoo-user] Nameserver lookups fail on virtual server after Kernel upgrade from version 4.9 to 4.12

On 21.08.2017 08:08, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Ah, so silentoldconfig is effectively the same as old config. Silentoldconfig is quite a useful make target, since it only asks about newly introduced kernel options. > Does your old kernel still work ad before? Just wondering if another > update

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 4.12.5 hard lockups, nothing in logs.

On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 11:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I'm seeing changes in 4.12 too and haven't bothered looking further > as > 4.11 still works for me. My external monitors and USB keyboard & > mouse > on laptops stopped working with 4.12 and other silliness which I > forget. > > My

Re: [gentoo-user] Nameserver lookups fail on virtual server after Kernel upgrade from version 4.9 to 4.12

Ah, so silentoldconfig is effectively the same as old config. I've not use it before and must have been confusing it with olddefconfig. Sorry for the noise. Does your old kernel still work ad before? Just wondering if another update could have caused this. On 20 August 2017 15:25:56 EEST,

Re: [gentoo-user] downgrading glibc

On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:25 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote: > Hi Raffaele, > > Am Freitag, 18. August 2017, 09:00:52 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi: > > […] > > Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means trouble? > > yes, you would crush your system. Therefore the even the ebuild > prohibits it

[gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:26:49 -0600, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > I don't believe that will be enough. You should update RUBY_TARGETS in > /etc/portage/make.conf if you have it set. If you don't have it set and > are still getting this error, that's a bug and should be filed on b.g.o. > I have a