gcc-7.3.9-r3 is marked stable, yet it fails to build if you have the
current stable version of glibc installed (2.28-r5).
Is that a bug, or am I doing something wrong?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Th' MIND is the Pizza
On 24/07/2019 16:49, Hasan ÇALIŞIR wrote:
Today i got linux-headers-4.19 update.
Doesn't it need re-building glibc that currently not triggered on my system?
Nope. No need.
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the
ebuild. You have it masked manually, it would seem.
Did you leave yourself a comment as to why it was masked?
Anyone else seeing a multitude of segv in libc on a stable box with
=sys-libs/glibc-2.34-r10?
not everything dies, but a lot of important stuff does, including
portage and gdb
profile on that box is:
profiles/default/linux/amd64/17.1/no-multilib/hardened
-JimC
--
James Cloos
Hello list,
This workstation acts as compile host for a few others, and I NFS-mount those
clients in a chroot jail.
Now, when glibc is updated, I'm supposed to 'telinit u'. My question is: if I
do that inside the chroot jail, does it operate only in there, or does it
rerun init on the host
owerful machine create binpackages
> for everything when it updates, and then let all my smaller machines pull
> from that. It works pretty well for the most part.
>
> But when there's a glibc update I have to specifically install it first. If
> I don't, then about half the ti
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Nicolai Beuermann:
You are right it´s not a real solution. Only a solution to get back the
old (and working) system with two installed versions of glibc in package
database.
So emerge -ep world shows it would re-install 2.3.4.
quickpkg glibc-2.3.4
to be kiosk machine in the UN headquarters.
This apparently requires re-compiling glibc, which I intend to do
right after the install. Since it's such a basic component of
everything, are there any boobytraps with rebuilding glibc, or is it
simply a matter of...
emerge --ask -deep
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:55:16 +0300, Niki Balov wrote:
i want to ask how to mask versions of glibc above 2.4? I compile my
entire system with gcc3.4.5 and glibc 2.4 and i don't want to upgrade
them. I added the following lines in package.mask
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5
sys-libs/glibc-2.4
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Sven Köhler wrote:
(snip)
What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales?
2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1
No. Glibc-2.4-r1 used .utf8 locales.. Just as an example of .utf8 usage
even before glibc-2.4 read this Gentoo Weekly NewsLetter:
http://www.gentoo.org
On 2006-05-05 19:11, Farhan Ahmed uttered these thoughts:
Well userlocales USE flag was there in glibc-2.4-r1 but it's absent in
glibc-2.4-r2.. But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1
with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build I just have
en_US/ISO-8859-1
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:11, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Jerry McBride wrote:
Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
running on it?
I used to run gcc-4.0.3 and latest glibc (don't remember the version
number) some time ago.. But now running gcc-4.1.0 and glibc
Grant schreef:
I noticed my glibc and gcc were updated to 2.3.5 in my last big emerge
world. Should I run an emptytree emerge now?
- Grant
first, your gcc got not updated to 2.3.5
second: no.
You do NOT NEED to do an emptytree. Never!
glibc updates are nothing to worry about, one replaces
Well, as the title, glibc is failing on me on my server. I have noticed that
in the stack trace there is: multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs'
and emerge --info shows glibc-2.3.6-r4 and glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 are both
installed. Not sure why. Not sure even if this is the problem
I have glibc-2.12.1 running on two ~x86 systems with no problems so far.
Hi,
Anyone successfully built and using glibc-2.12.1 yet?
I see the tree just pushed an update down from 2.11.2 to 2.12.1, and
downgrading that package is decidedly non-trivial. Only comment I can find at
this early
On 13:34 Mon 07 Feb , Neil Bothwick wrote:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
desktop and home server and broke both.
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc
me scratching my head for a few minutes.
what happens if you remove the entry in /var/db?
From gentoo's point of view, glibc suddenly is not installed. You are
free to choose a version.
That's a good question, I had assumed it was getting the info from the
binpkg, but a grep of the entry
benifit if you set NPTL_KERN_VER=2.6.38
in make.conf and recompile glibc. That way glibc could use things not
present in older kernels.
I haven't researched if there are any such things, perhaps someone else
knows.
glibc will use things in newer kernels anyway. You don't need to use
On 06/06/12 13:37, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 06.06.2012 12:25, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I wish to build a binary package of glibc-2.14.1-r3. I don't want to
actually install it on my system. Just build a tbz2 for it to use on
another system. Is there a way to do that? Portage aborts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27.06.2012 15:58, Michael Mol wrote:
SNIP
The other big thing I kept hearing about was try changing
{this|that|other thing}; it might be affecting glibc, because glibc
is a whiny b*tch. Are there alternatives to glibc?
SNIP
Alternatives
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge glibc. See:
* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214065
* https
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com writes:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge glibc. See:
* https
:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge glibc. See:
* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214065
* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274771
* https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge glibc. See:
* https
Am Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:48:23 +0100
schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
On 14/09/12 22:48, Mick wrote:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf
* and remerge glibc. See:
* https
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/09/12 22:48, Mick wrote:
I got this message in elog:
* Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4:
* Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols.
* To fix this you can add splitdebug
On 01/16/13 06:31, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 13 January 2013, at 06:53, Andrew Lowe wrote:
...
From all of the above, I think the important part is that I need to
install some glibc developement files. A google search doesn't point me
in
the direction of what these might be. According
u...@posteo.de> wrote:
>> >> > On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> These are the last f
e:
> >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> >> >> > On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to instal
On 02/02/2018 01:07 PM, Floyd Anderson wrote:
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 18:34:23 +0100
> Helmut Jarausch <jarau...@skynet.be> wrote:
>> With glibc-2.27 installed I cannot compile anything, since most
>> packages try to include
>> which doesn't exi
Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2018, 03:39:04 CET schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
>
> > What's your sys-libs/glibc ?!
>
> [I] sys-libs/glibc
> Installed versions: (2.2)^s(09:54:43 AM 02/04/2018)
Heh, guessed so. Welcome to the wonderful world of early testing.
It will take some t
On Friday, 19 June 2020 22:19:39 BST Hervé Guillemet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to distribute some linux binaries and the one built with my
> up-to-date gentoo sytem won't run on distributions using older glibc.
>
> My idea is too maintain a gentoo chroot dedicated for compi
apache2 hal logrotate objc
gcj sasl vmmouse wacom radeon tga vesa vga via
vmware -ipv6 -imap -maildir -gnome
I'm running an update world after about 2 mnths of not updating and
keep hitting a snag when glibc takes its turn out of the 164 updates
left.
The first error
Hi,
A glibc upgrade from 2.3.5-r2 to 2.3.6-r5 inside a vserver is failing on
me.
It's a new install using a 20060317 stage3 built for vservers by hollow.
I need a 2.3 glibc for the app that will run in it, hence the very old
stage3. Running a later glibc is not an option.
The stage
there. Your system is broken and fixing takes the same effort than
reinstalling.
Except reinstalling raises the specter of losing all my key data. The
guides are written for a blank system. That is not what I have. The
problem is with glibc. Why can't I fix glibc and then to an emerge -eav
from
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:43 PM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> On 06/19 11:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
>> > On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
e wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
> >> >>
> >> >> These are the last few lines of that process:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> al/execin
Hi,
WRONG! :) :) :)
I did something different, but it was the same amount of "wrong".
I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
(As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
as it seems.
As suggested
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 13:57 +0200, Vesselin Mladenov wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem recompiling glibc on my computer after I have changed
my USE flags.
Here is what emerge is going to do:
root # emerge -p -v --update --deep --newuse world
These are the packages that I would merge
Not there unfortunatelly.
Here are my CFLAGS:
CFLAGS=-march=pentium4 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fexpensive-optimizations -pipe
On 11/10/05, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 13:57 +0200, Vesselin Mladenov wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem recompiling glibc on my
to resolve. The first time I got this failure,
I tried just emerging gcc. I thought it brought in version 4.someting,
but I find that I still have 3.3.6, which I would have thought to be new
enough to build glibc.
Help. What am I missing here.
clwsapp07 ~ # gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc
For info, there used to be a website with pre-built binaries provided by
one of the devs for just such rescues.
Also, dont the current livecd's do a stage 3 install, which means there
should be a quickpkg'd glibc on them? I dont have a system with
squashfs on it, or able to boot one to check
might always have issues.
What is the approved way to do this?
When I tried to install an old version of glibc from a binary, I got the
error:
The error was
* Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
* Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
*
* ERROR: sys
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Hi,
Before I file this as a bug I'd like to make sure it's not caused by
something wrong with my system. Please help me determine that.
In the past two days I was trying to upgrade my glibc from version 2.4
to 2.5. Each time I tried it the emerge process
-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.5/../../../libc.so:5:
syntax error
Can you post the output of:
carcharias lib # emerge -pv glibc
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] sys-libs/glibc-2.4 USE=nptl nptlonly pic
radeon tga vesa vga via
vmware -ipv6 -imap -maildir -gnome
I'm running an update world after about 2 mnths of not updating and
keep hitting a snag when glibc takes its turn out of the 164 updates
left.
The first error was apparently due to missing USE flags and said:
checking glibc-powerpc-cpu
On 9/1/06, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Grant davidgrant at gmail.com writes:
If anyone can help me I'm desperate to save this system and not have
to reinstall.
Well, I have lost xwindows/kde on (2) systems because of an upgrade of
make.profile to point to 2006.1. I'm sure glibc
On 9/1/06, Meino Christian Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glibc-2.4 is nptl-only!
NPTL requires a CHOST of i486 or better
You missed fixing this error.
-Richard
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r3 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1555: Called dyn_setup
ebuild.sh, line
is the way to go here.
OK, this was going to be my next attempt
Confusing, because I have a Pentium Pro 200MHz that is
i686 (CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu)
with this info from /proc/cpuinfo:
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov
Does this mean he can't use glibc-2.4
did it succesfully.
Well, I did it anyway (had a bit of time on my hands). And surprise, I
had the exact same symptoms as the bug above, i.e. a relocation error
before unmerging the previous glibc-2.3.6-r4. But everything was still
working ok.
So I did *not* panic ;-) and just emerged glibc-2.4
you get some responses back from others who did it succesfully.Well, I did it anyway (had a bit of time on my hands). And surprise, Ihad the exact same symptoms as the bug above,
i.e. a relocation errorbefore unmerging the previous glibc-2.3.6-r4. But everything was stillworking ok.So I did
400G in 1 second, and continues to
climb).
I suspect the problem is that RHEL v4 uses =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4,
whereas we have =sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 installed.
I have three questions:
1. Am I posting to the right list?
2. Any idea what's going on? Could it be something other than
by glibc, so that seems to be important. That
machine seems to have some mismatched components, but which ones?
It's important that glibc be compiled with the kernel headers that are
actually installed on your machine, so the order of package upgrading
does matter, at least when system libs like
:
inotify_init failed: fnction not implemented...
inotify_init is provided by glibc, so that seems to be important. That
machine seems to have some mismatched components, but which ones?
It's important that glibc be compiled with the kernel headers that are
actually installed on your machine, so
On Sunday 22 August 2010, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:57 on Sunday 22 August 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
There is a way to downgrade for the brave.
quickpkg glibc
Maximilian Bräutigam writes:
I'm trying to update my glibc for now 2 weeks or so and it doesn't
matter what I'm doing, I run into a strange error.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
nux-gnu-nptl/libc_pic.a(init-first.os):(.data+0x0): multiple
On Monday 08 November 2010 12:04:50 Alex Schuster wrote:
Maximilian Bräutigam writes:
I'm trying to update my glibc for now 2 weeks or so and it doesn't
matter what I'm doing, I run into a strange error.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
nux-gnu
Am 08.11.2010 13:04, schrieb Alex Schuster:
Maximilian Bräutigam writes:
I'm trying to update my glibc for now 2 weeks or so and it doesn't
matter what I'm doing, I run into a strange error.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-li
nux-gnu-nptl/libc_pic.a
On 07/02/2011 03:05 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort programs
with a:
*** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid pointer: ... ***
or similar error message. I have no idea which package was updated that
triggered this. I did
On 06/06/12 13:49, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/06/12 13:37, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
On 06.06.2012 12:25, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I wish to build a binary package of glibc-2.14.1-r3. I don't want to
actually install it on my system. Just build a tbz2 for it to use on
another system
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423149
As it turned out, it was my CFLAGS. Not the ones anyone usually cares
about, either.
If you build glibc with CFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -g3, your glibc will be
very, very broken
One option is to copy the glibc version you want to some other directory
and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH before starting the executable. Running ldd on
all the executables/shared libraries in question should give you a list of
all the shared libraries you might need to copy to a safe place.
On Mon, Aug
On 07/06/2016 03:17 AM, Franz Fellner wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have issues with some prgrams eating too much memory. This seems to be
> related to glibc not trimming as necessary which results in way too much
> memory still occupied by the program after free()ing memory.
&g
On 2019-03-30, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 15:09:06 - (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2019-03-29, Philip Webb wrote:
>> > 190329 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> >
>> >> gcc-7.3.9-r3 is marked stable, yet it fails to build if you have th
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
>
> See which packages were built against the new glib. Do:
>$ qlop -l -d 2days
> See which packages were emerged AFTER glibc 2.28. Are they critical
> packages? If not, downgrade glibc anyway. Then rebuild those packages.
I didn't consider
.
That´s the situation (again):
eix sys-libs/glibc
[D] sys-libs/glibc
Available versions: (2.2) [P]2.2.5-r10 [P]2.3.2-r12 2.3.5-r3 2.3.6-r4
2.3.6-r5 2.4-r4 2.5-r2 2.5-r3 2.5-r4 **2.5.1 ~2.6 2.6.1 ~2.7 ~2.7-r1 ~2.7-r2
{build debug erandom gd glibc-compat20 glibc-omitfp hardened
On Thursday 20 September 2007, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Hi,
A glibc upgrade from 2.3.5-r2 to 2.3.6-r5 inside a vserver is failing
on me.
[snip]
Update:
According to
http://www.nabble.com/Next-showstopper-for-new-user--setjmp.S-in-glibc-2.3.6-t3553495.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/crossgcc/2004
Hi,
I don't know if this is clear by now, but apparently the glibc version
which is printed is the glibc version used to built python, because
libcname,libcversion = libc_ver(sys.executable)
in this line the version is determined of sys.executable which is the
python interpreter used to run
Bo Ørsted Andresen writes:
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 02:17:27 Alex Schuster wrote:
and what is the output of:
# cat /var/db/pkg/sys-libs/{glibc-2.2.5-r2,glibc-2.5}/SLOT
A blank line, and 2.2.
You should definitely fix that. glibc-2.2.5-r2 is supposed to be in SLOT
2.2 too which
On Sunday 10 September 2006 17:46, Peter wrote:
This is not connected to your profile or gcc upgrade. It's your glibc
upgrade. glibc-2.4.x is stricter when it comes to syntax than
glibc-2.3.x. Please show the output of:
I did not upgrade glibc. I recompiled it with the gcc-4.1.1 upgrade
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 1:21 PM, wabe wrote:
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
>> Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2018, 20:11:51 CEST schrieb wabe:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I have a problem and didn't find a solution yet.
>> >
>> > Upgrading
Roman Zilka ha scritto:
Hey Emilio,
I should upgrade /etc/locale.build to /etc/locale.gen.
that's right, you should.
I did not find anything about this upgrade.
glibc has been warning about this for a very long time (year, I guess)
during emerge. glibc-2.6.1 is the first stable
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:04:43 +0200
Yoav Luft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
during an emerge -uDN process, the compilation for gcc-4.2.1 failed,
as well as for glibc, with same errors.
I have run revdep-rebuilt, and found out about a broken
libexpat.so.0thingy, which I solved following
Am Dienstag, 13. November 2007 schrieb ext de Almeida, Valmor F.:
glibc was unmerged and now I can't use common shell commands such as ls
or cp to list and copy files from a backup.
I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd and emerge
glibc.
Is there another way to do
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:36:09 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd and
emerge glibc.
Is there another way to do this?
No.
Unless you already have buildpkg in FEATURES, then you can unpack the
tarball from $PKGDIR/All to the root
there should be a quickpkg'd glibc on them?
A stage 3 is one large tarball, not separate packages.
--
A couple of naive questions ...
Couldn't one simply extract the glibc library from the stage 3 tarball
to /lib? Then, having the needed library, couldn't one run emerge?
Regards,
David
forwarding.
Xlib: connection to localhost:10.0 refused by server
Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key
Cannot open display:
Ah, I had this problem for months; it was driving me crazy!
I don't remember the specifics, but it had to to with some wankery of glibc
not working properly with xauth. I'm
stable kernel, gnome, gdm, glibc
both gcc4.3
Does someone know something about this?
No, not really. However, I don't see any glibc errors there. They're from gdm
and related to glib (no c at the end).
Bye...
Dirk
Okey then, let correct me. There are some Critical glib warnings
Jeff Cranmer schrieb:
I have a problem with my gentoo system
I am trying to update, and I get a C preprocessor /lib/cpp fails sanity
check error on a number of packages.
After a bit of searching, the solution that I come across most often is to
recompile glibc and gcc. Unfortunately
reinstalling.
Except reinstalling raises the specter of losing all my key data. The guides
are written for a blank system. That is not what I have. The problem is
with glibc. Why can't I fix glibc and then to an emerge -eav from there?
Jeff
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:20:45 -0500, Michael George wrote:
Jan 2 09:01:07 brego init: Trying to re-exec init
Jan 2 09:01:08 brego locale-gen: Generating locale-archive:
forcing # of jobs to 1
Does this coincide with (re)emerging glibc?
As a matter of fact, I did re-emerge
.
This apparently requires re-compiling glibc, which I intend to do
right after the install. Since it's such a basic component of
everything, are there any boobytraps with rebuilding glibc, or is it
simply a matter of...
emerge --ask -deep --newuse --update --world
--
Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An infinite
a couple of days ago, and glibc linux-headers are
mentioned. Is this normal?
Perhaps I've missed something in the previous thread about the world
file, but surely glibc linux-headers are depends of other packages?
I'm sure I never specifically installed them.
Stroller.
--
gentoo-user
a glance at the world file on a laptop
I installed a couple of days ago, and glibc linux-headers are
mentioned. Is this normal?
Perhaps I've missed something in the previous thread about the world
file, but surely glibc linux-headers are depends of other packages?
I'm sure I never specifically
dependencies ...done!
[blocks B ] cross-mipsel-linux-gnu/mips-headers (is blocking
sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.11-r2)
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 [2.3.5-r1] -build -erandom
-glibc-compat20 -glibc-omitfp -hardened -linuxthreads-tls (-multilib) +nls
+nptl -nptlonly -pic -profile
On Freitag, 20. April 2007, Zhixu Liu wrote:
Does anyone know how to run kernel 2.4 with NPTL support? Thanks.
I'm running fine with kernel 2.6, but for some special requirements, we
need to switch to kernel 2.4, then the kernel just panic.
glibc is compiled with nptl, no nptlonly. Any
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:53, Christopher E wrote:
Hello All,
What should I do after I do a emerge of gcc and glibc vers in subject line?
I have also when doing that emerged told it to do kde and gnome so
both of them will be at the latest versions in the tree that are
~amd64.
X 7
strange to me. Is this on the x86 arch? What does equery
belongs /lib/tls/libpthread* report?
Do you use nptl and/or nptlonly for glibc (emerge -pv sys-libs/glibc).
If not, try:
echo sys-libs/glibc nptl nptlonly /etc/portage/package.use
emerge -DNv world
You do not need to rebuild firefox after
kristina clair wrote:
Hm!
CFLAGS=-O2 -mcpu=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer
CHOST=i386-pc-linux-gnu
I did not set this box up, so I'm not sure - is there any reason why
someone would set the CHOST to that?
I checked the /var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/work directory,
and indeed
swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need
be, right?
yeah, but problems are known. So there are good reasons NOT to use ntplonly or
to advise to use it generally.
And if you mean 'reemerge glibc' you are right, you can always 'swap' them
around.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:30:10PM -0700, George Garvey wrote:
/usr/portage itself is NFS mounted from a server and is fine.
However, emerge --metadata and emerge -av1 glibc both report problems
with some bdb stuff and doesn't work.
This all happened after a failed glibc emerge
On Thursday 18 August 2005 00:31, Grant wrote:
I noticed my glibc and gcc were updated to 2.3.5 in my last big emerge
world. Should I run an emptytree emerge now?
- Grant
first, your gcc got not updated to 2.3.5
second: no.
You do NOT NEED to do an emptytree. Never!
glibc updates
I noticed my glibc and gcc were updated to 2.3.5 in my last big emerge
world. Should I run an emptytree emerge now?
- Grant
first, your gcc got not updated to 2.3.5
second: no.
You do NOT NEED to do an emptytree. Never!
glibc updates are nothing to worry about, one replaces
is after you
have recompiled glibc to use NPTL. And even then, plenty of people will
tell you it's not necessary.
Certainly it's not necessary for a normal update of glibc, much less
gcc. Everything will pretty much update itself as you update the
programs, and it's otherwise not an issue.
HTH
Hi all.
I've crashed shm with a perl-script (IPC::Shareable).
shmget returns IPC::Shareable::SharedMem: shmget: File exists, if I remove
all shared memory segments created by the app with ipcrm I get the following
glibc error: ** glibc detected *** corrupted double-linked list
Nothing helps
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Frank Schafer wrote:
Did you an ``emerge --newuse world'' before you tried to install further
packages?
Just a thought. I think I've seen nptl mentioned in the installation log
of glibc. What if glibc don't know about this?
Frank
PS: I could be wrong. Don't have a gentoo
I did upgrade the glibc today. How did you recognize the missing locale?Alexander Kirillov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4.I don't have userlocales flag set either.And probably should consider selling sweatshirts to oil-exporting countries
es_MX
fa_IR
fr_FR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it_IT
ja_JP
ja_JP.eucjp
ja_JP.utf8
You've probably been lucky enough to be either en, de or fr?:)
I did upgrade the glibc today. How did you recognize the missing locale?
I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4.
I don't have
301 - 400 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
