On Sat 20 August 2011 03:48:18 Dale did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat 20 August 2011 02:17:06 Dale did opine thusly:
It was discussed on -dev so far. This is the subject line:
Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper
initramfs in the handbook?
I
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on its own
and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho. Looks like /,
/boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It downright sucks.
You
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 09:57:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat 20 August 2011 03:48:18 Dale did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sat 20 August 2011 02:17:06 Dale did opine thusly:
It was discussed on -dev so far. This is the subject line:
Warn users not to do separate /usr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
[snip]
I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on
its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho.
Looks like
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 13:59:42 David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
[snip]
I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on
its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now
Wel...
... the Gentoo project can always fork e2fsprogs ...
... but who will maintain it, then?
Rgds,
On 2011-08-20, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 13:59:42 David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev
On Sat 20 August 2011 14:29:15 Mick did opine thusly:
On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 13:59:42 David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:48:18 -0500, Dale wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
[snip]
I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have
/var
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:58:53 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot:
On 2011-08-20, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
This is madness. Is there anything we can do to stop it?
[top posting corrected]
Wel...
... the Gentoo project can
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 03:27:23 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel,
Em 18/08/2011 23:27, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first
time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that
Em 19/08/2011 07:09, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 03:27:23 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first time I try to build a kernel
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:12 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 19/08/2011 07:09, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Friday 19 Aug 2011 03:27:23 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several
On Fri 19 August 2011 13:12:25 fra...@gmail.com did opine thusly:
I the case I don't need a initram, I guess that the grub line for
parameter passing to the kernel would be empty. Am I wrong?
Yes.
Using or not using kernel parameters has nothing to do with whether
you use an initramfs or
Em 19/08/2011 10:48, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Fri 19 August 2011 13:12:25 fra...@gmail.com did opine thusly:
I the case I don't need a initram, I guess that the grub line for
parameter passing to the kernel would be empty. Am I wrong?
Yes.
Using or not using
On Fri 19 August 2011 15:06:46 fra...@gmail.com did opine thusly:
Some Gentoo users still need an initramfs, such as booting off
drives in a RAID configuration. They need the RAID drivers
first to read the disks so use an initramfs to fix this little
problem exactly as Ubunut fixes their
Gregory Woodbury wrote:
The initramfs is a container for modules and stuff need to bring up
the system before the mounts of
/ and /boot.If all the drivers are built-in to the kernel (or at
least the minimum required drivers are built-in)
then the initramfs isn't necessary.
Passing
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do
not have a) /dev/sda* root partition (real-root); during the boot it
stops,
On 18 August 2011 18:59, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the first
time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do not
have a) /dev/sda* root
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the first
time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do not
have a) /dev/sda*
Em 18/08/2011 16:08, András Csányi sayusi.a...@gmail.com escreveu:
On 18 August 2011 18:59, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first
time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new
Em 18/08/2011 16:13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new
Em 18/08/2011 16:17, fra...@gmail.com escreveu:
Em 18/08/2011 16:13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is
the first time I try to build a kernel
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:26 PM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 18/08/2011 16:17, fra...@gmail.com escreveu:
Forgot to say: I am able to boot the LiveCD and chroot to that partition.
Now checking the kernel configuration, there's only SATA_ACARD_AHCI set up
as a module, everything else AHCI is
On Thursday 18 August 2011 20:42:30 Michael Mol wrote:
Don't forget to check your BIOS. You might also consider enabling
SCSI-generic (disk), which would catch ide-emulated disks and put a
scsi interface around them in the kernel.
But it might well shove a generic driver in before the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:59 PM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the
first time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do
not have a) /dev/sda* root
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:59 AM, fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the first
time I try to build a kernel without genkernel.
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do not
have a) /dev/sda*
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com writes:
Also, check your BIOS to see if it's running your SATA controller in
some kind of IDE emulation mode. If it is, disable that. (Some
motherboards let you choose between IDE and RAID, where RAID is
AHCI mode. Others call IDE mode 'legacy', and still others
201 - 227 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
