On Wednesday 26 August 2009 04:37:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while trying to update my gentoo I got this:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =media-libs/jpeg-7 have been
masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:10:18 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output
I posted).
Incorrect. Something else is
On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:10:18 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:00:35 Roy Wright wrote:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:10:18 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 04:37:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while trying to update my gentoo I got this:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =media-libs/jpeg-7 have been
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Volker Armin
Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 04:37:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while trying to update my
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [09-08-26 18:30]:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Volker Armin
Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 04:37:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM,
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [09-08-26 18:30]:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Volker Armin
Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while trying to update my gentoo I got this:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =media-libs/jpeg-7 have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- media-libs/jpeg-7 (masked by: ~x86
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/26/2009 05:32 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
while trying to update my gentoo I got this:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =media-libs/jpeg-7 have been
masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to
Don't mask it. Install it, but also install media-libs/jpeg-compat
alongside it so packages won't break.
it is also masked...
Why I am urged via jpeg-7 to install maked package which will only
have no effect on non-masked package, when I install another masked
package?
--
Please don't
On 08/26/2009 05:52 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Don't mask it. Install it, but also install media-libs/jpeg-compat
alongside it so packages won't break.
it is also masked...
Er, you need this package on your system. A lot of software depends on
it. It's not optional.
Why I am
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output
I posted).
If I install it, many packaged needs to rebuild, for which I
have not the time.
When I want to
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output
I posted).
If I install it, many packaged needs to rebuild, for which I
On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked, Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to update jpeg-7 (according the output
I posted).
If I install it, many packaged needs
On 08/26/2009 06:10 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following what you're trying to say :P
jpeg-7 is masked
It is not, actually. Unless you mean it's keyworded ~arch. But it's
not masked.
Without it any update process stops with this
failure. jpeg-7 needs itsself to
16 matches
Mail list logo
