Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium build process tries wrong LLVM

On Monday, 1 May 2023 00:34:11 BST Alan Grimes wrote: > There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang > > The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is > installed. Fine so far... > > So therefore something selects llvm 15 to build =( >

[gentoo-user] Chromium build process tries wrong LLVM

There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is installed.  Fine so far... So therefore something selects llvm 15 to build =( # *  sys-devel/clang   Latest version available:

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium and dbus...

On Fri, 2023-04-28 at 11:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent > fact > that linux is garbage. I don't think shitting on Linux will attract a lot of help on this mailing list. Nevertheless... > Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no

[gentoo-user] chromium and dbus...

It looks like chromium has no freakin idea how to use dbus... A decenently good OS would provide an IPC mechanism and little else. =| So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent fact that linux is garbage. Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no errors when I poke it with

[gentoo-user] Chromium still doesn't work.

A new build of chromium came down today, no change in behavior. (High frequency error 11's with blank config, can't even display about:blank ) It must be some kind of dependency conflict but I don't seem to have any way to diagnose it deeper. I will be writing these posts daily until the

[gentoo-user] Chromium user files

AFAIK, chromium uses ~/settings/chromium  There's a lot of stuff in there so I don't suspect any other directories. I ask this because even against a BLANK config directory, the damn thing still emits crash dumps at a rate of hundreds a second, here is a sample... =\ -- Beware of Zombies.

[gentoo-user] Chromium

Looks like upstream noticed chromium was segfaulting so they took it off the every few milliseconds update sechedule and tried to fix it, looks like they added some assertion checks and shipped it out without trying to compile it.. x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang++ -MMD -MF

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium

On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 20:18 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > Now building emptytree world again > > console looks like: > > [7268:7268:0405/201646.772380:ERROR:network_service_instance_impl.cc( > 541)] > Network service crashed, restarting service. >

[gentoo-user] Chromium

1. I've purged all obsolete packages from the system except for kernel 5.19 which I'm holding as a backup. 2. Everything looks like it compiles normally except for RUBY which is utterly broken. 3. Seamonkey crashes on __ANY__ video page, esp youtube but basically all of them, simple signal

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:06 PM Laurence Perkins wrote: > > Compile time for Chromium currently seems to run about four hours on an > i7-9700. Well, that does it, then. chromium-bin is good enough, I think. But of course, the problem of obnoxious shortcuts remains... >

RE: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

Compile time for Chromium currently seems to run about four hours on an i7-9700. -Original Message- From: Jorge Almeida Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 2:26 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts? On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 8:19 AM Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > I don't know how to do that (I'm talking about several itens in the > > bookmarks bar, not a single menu with several links). But I'll try a > > clean config anyway, the bookmark issue can be dealt with later. > > There are import and

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, 29 May 2022 23:10:16 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Why not export the bookmarks then re-import them? That way you can > > start with a clean config. > > > I don't know how to do that (I'm talking about several itens in the > bookmarks bar, not a single menu with several links). But

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:48 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > Until now, no improvement. (Note that I symlinked > > ~/.config/chromium-bin to ~/.config/google-chrome, otherwise I would > > lose all bookmarks. Maybe it was a bad idea?) >

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:47 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > New Hope! I've found this: > https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/ > It seems that the "Shortcut manager" extension doesn't exist any more. It was supposed to allow editing the "default" shortcuts, something most pages say

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly, > that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of > patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious, > invasive keyboard

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:39:17 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > I suppose this means I can't simply remove the shortcuts from > chromium... () > New Hope! I've found this: https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/ - -- xWK

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:33 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53 > Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > > > > Maybe take a look here: >

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > > > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try > > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like > chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) ) > I have no concerns regarding

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) ) -- xWK

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 9:56 PM w...@op.pl wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21 > Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > > > So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would > > remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21 Jorge Almeida napisał(a): > So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would > remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle for trashing it all. Is > this an unwinnable fight? (And is the

[gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?

I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly, that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious, invasive keyboard shortcuts/mouse gestures. So, I decided to try chromium (-bin, for now), in

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium will not go on the internet anymore

Move onto the newer version and keep the earlier version number handy so if the newer version breaks especially in the same way you have a backout. On Sat, 2 Oct 2021, John Covici wrote: > Hi. I have discovered that www-client/chromium-95.0.4621.4 will not > go to any internet webpage. > >

[gentoo-user] chromium will not go on the internet anymore

Hi. I have discovered that www-client/chromium-95.0.4621.4 will not go to any internet webpage. When I use it, it always says page not responsive and gives me wait or exit buttons. Firefox works fine.I ran it in a terminal and got all kinds of errors and my logs have a couple of seg faults.

[gentoo-user] Chromium Catastrophy continues.

My GLIBC situation is as follows, as you know GLIBC cannot be downgraded once upgraded. *  sys-libs/glibc   Latest version available: 2.33   Latest version installed: 2.33   Size of files: 16,676 KiB   Homepage:  https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/   Description:   GNU libc

[gentoo-user] Chromium: GIGAFOOBAR!!!

Chromium now cannot render web pages. It's throwing signal 6 abort errors all over the place. When I try to update it it spews all of this nonsense to the console:  !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy " (2017-05-21) # (and others, updated later) # These old versions of toolchain packages

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium Catastrophy continues.

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:52:05 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > My GLIBC situation is as follows, as you know GLIBC cannot be downgraded > once upgraded. It can, at your own risk. Read the ebuild to see how. > *  sys-libs/glibc >   Latest version available: 2.33 >   Latest version installed:

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: GIGAFOOBAR!!!

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:46:04 -0500, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) > > > This

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: GIGAFOOBAR!!!

Don't forget to reply to the list... I say after I forgot to change the to address on the email I just sent. On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: GIGAFOOBAR!!!

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:25:31 -0500, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) > > This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the > ebuild. You have it masked

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: GIGAFOOBAR!!!

On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the ebuild. You have it masked manually, it would seem. Did you leave yourself a comment as to why it was masked?

[gentoo-user] Chromium Aw, Snap!

Hi, since a few days Chromium is broken here. Even deleting ~/.config/chromium I get this error message immediately after Chromium comes up. I have tried the version 88.0.4324.150 , 89.0.4389.40 and 90.0.4412.3 What might be the reason? Am I the only one with this problem? Thanks for a

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium....

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:29:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > Oh for the love of god: > > >  * Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70: > >  * ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile > phase): >  *   ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release

[gentoo-user] Chromium....

Oh for the love of god:  * Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70:  * ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile phase):  *   ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release v8_context_snapshot_generator failed  *  * Call stack:  * ebuild.sh, line  125:  Called

Re: [EXTERNAL] [gentoo-user] Chromium on linux, build question

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:12 PM John Covici wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:21:45 -0400, > Laurence Perkins wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > > > > > On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote: > > > Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the > > > Chrome > > > OS version,

Re: [EXTERNAL] [gentoo-user] Chromium on linux, build question

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:21:45 -0400, Laurence Perkins wrote: > > [1 ] > > > On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote: > > Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the > > Chrome > > OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin > > which is

Re: [EXTERNAL] [gentoo-user] Chromium on linux, build question

On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote: > Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the > Chrome > OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin > which is called Chrom next. I did not see any use flags, so how can > I > do this on gentoo?

[gentoo-user] Chromium on linux, build question

Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the Chrome OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin which is called Chrom next. I did not see any use flags, so how can I do this on gentoo? I am using the unstable version of gentoo. It is my understanding

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

On Friday, 15 February 2019 09:48:34 GMT Andreas Fink wrote: > That's because depclean sets --with-bdeps=y by default, i.e. build > dependencies are considered to be crucial to the system. If you update > your depclean command and add the flag --with-bdeps=n it should allow > you to unmerge java

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:32:15 + Mick wrote: > On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:36:04 GMT Mick wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I just noticed

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:36:04 GMT Mick wrote: > On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as > > > dependencies,

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick: > > Hi All, > > > > I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as > > dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new > > USE

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick: > Hi All, > > I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as > dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new USE > flag closure-compile, which I think is advertised as a good thing. > >

[gentoo-user] chromium-72.0.3626.96 and Java

Hi All, I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new USE flag closure-compile, which I think is advertised as a good thing. Would you know if these Java dependencies are used for chromium

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium generic build

On 3.6.2018 00:57, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2018, 13:07:11 CEST schrieb Samuraiii: >> Hello list, >> >> I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be >> same across all machines). >> >> I run amd64, multilib on following processor types: >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium generic build

Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2018, 13:07:11 CEST schrieb Samuraiii: > Hello list, > > I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be > same across all machines). > > I run amd64, multilib on following processor types: > > Core2, Corei7, Ryzen 7 and Threadripper. > > What CFLAGS

[gentoo-user] Chromium generic build

Hello list, I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be same across all machines). I run amd64, multilib on following processor types: Core2, Corei7, Ryzen 7 and Threadripper. What CFLAGS should I use for mentioned cpus? I am possibly comfortable to build two

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-65.0.3325.146 compilation warnings

On Monday, 12 March 2018 08:27:31 GMT Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Mick wrote: > > I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to > > emerge chromium-65.0.3325.146: > > > > warning: unknown warning option

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-65.0.3325.146 compilation warnings

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Mick wrote: > I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to emerge > chromium-65.0.3325.146: > > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-enum-compare-switch'; did you mean '- > Wno-enum-compare'?

[gentoo-user] chromium-65.0.3325.146 compilation warnings

I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to emerge chromium-65.0.3325.146: warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-enum-compare-switch'; did you mean '- Wno-enum-compare'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] warning: unknown warning option

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, Jan 31 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > [snip] >> I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy. >> >> 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"? > > I sync ("emerge --sync") only one

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:38:27 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there > to my other computers. After the rsync is done, you need to do "emerge > --metadata" in the recipient machine (--sync does that for you > automatically). If

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: [snip] > I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy. > > 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"? I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there to my other computers.

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, Jan 24 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the >> build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and >> 36MB of

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Thu, Jan 25 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:29:59 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> > I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The >> > newer machine had a successful build first try. The second older (4 >> > years) machine had both failures.

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:29:59 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The > > newer machine had a successful build first try. The second older (4 > > years) machine had both failures. Each machine has profile > >

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build failure

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > > I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the > build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and > 36MB of build.log, the error shown below occurs > > I have two

[gentoo-user] chromium build failure

I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and 36MB of build.log, the error shown below occurs I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The newer machine had a successful build

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium no longer displays content of TLS certificate

On Friday, 8 September 2017 18:15:41 BST Todd Goodman wrote: > Go to the menu -> More Tools -> Developer Tools, then Security tab and > then View Certificate button > > Todd Thank you Todd. It beats me why Chromium devs have made checking the contents of a certificate more remote/obscure than

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium no longer displays content of TLS certificate

Go to the menu -> More Tools -> Developer Tools, then Security tab and then View Certificate button Todd On 09/08/2017 01:05 PM, Mick wrote: > Either chromium has stopped displaying the content of the TLS certificate of > a > web site I happen to visit, or it has made it quite complicated for

[gentoo-user] Chromium no longer displays content of TLS certificate

Either chromium has stopped displaying the content of the TLS certificate of a web site I happen to visit, or it has made it quite complicated for the user to find it. Chromium would allow the certificate to be displayed by clicking on the 'Secure' symbol on the left of the address bar.

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium 60 build failure

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5: > error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode > ​As stated by others, switching to GCC-5 or newer would be

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium 60 build failure

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5: > note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to > compile your code >

[gentoo-user] chromium 60 build failure

It looks like chromeium 60 just went stable for AMD64. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to build for me. I've googled the gcc error message from the build log, and the only thing I can find is somebody claiming it's caused by a bungled upgrade to gcc 5.x. I haven't upgrade to gcc 5.x, so that

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

On Saturday 27 February 2016 08:15:47 Daniel Frey wrote: --->8 > The brackets mean the USE flag is forced, masked or removed. > > (if you want to jump to the section in `man emerge` search for () using > "/\(\)" as searching for verbose or -v shows results everywhere) Actually, that search

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

On 02/27/2016 07:18 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote: >> On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote: > On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install > > > www- > > > client/chromium without all the bloat?

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- > > client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for > > > > any of these: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- > client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for > any of these: > > app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher >

[gentoo-user] Chromium bloat

Hello list, I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www- client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for any of these: app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher app-accessibility/espeak media-sound/sox

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-browser will not start

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:41:16 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: > Just now chromium will not start > > gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser > [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root > Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018 > > I am

[gentoo-user] chromium-browser will not start

Just now chromium will not start gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018 I am running stable gentoo, gnome, systemd thanks in advance for any tips. allan

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-browser will not start

What arch? On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:36 PM allan gottlieb wrote: > Just now chromium will not start > > gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser > [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root > Certs, loaded==false: NSS error

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-browser will not start

On Thu, Jan 28 2016, allan gottlieb wrote: > Just now chromium will not start > > gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser > [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root > Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018 > > I am running stable gentoo,

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium-browser will not start

On 01/28/2016 06:14 PM, allan gottlieb wrote: > Now (subsequent to the successful chromium) I did a revdep-rebuild. > It asked to rebuild cairo. Which I let it do. I haven't done a > revdep-rebuild for many month (over a year?) and must confess I thought > they were no longer needed. I always

[gentoo-user] Chromium fonts

Version 36.0.1985.125 (283153) shows many pages with non-antialiased fonts and does my eyes in - see attached screen shot. Zooming in makes it worse. Any ideas how I can fix this? This is its flags: Installed versions: 36.0.1985.125(11:42:35 07/19/14)(cups pulseaudio tcmalloc -bindist

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium browser plugins not listed

On May 24, 2014 5:43 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I run chromium-35.0.1916.114-r1 and noticed that only the 'Chromoting Viewer' plugin is listed under chromium://plugins. The other plugins must be there because they are being launched and run - e.g. adobe flash.

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium browser plugins not listed

On Saturday 24 May 2014 15:02:36 Mike Gilbert wrote: On May 24, 2014 5:43 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I run chromium-35.0.1916.114-r1 and noticed that only the 'Chromoting Viewer' plugin is listed under chromium://plugins. The other plugins must be there

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium browser plugins not listed

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mike, I didn't know about ppapi - or that this is available as a separate package. Shouldn't it be drawn in as dependency by Chromium, or at least done so by some USE flag? www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins will

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build issue

Took me a while because i don't use Chromium on that computer much so i lost track of the issue. The problem seems to have been that python was built with /dev/shm mounted with mode 0755. updated the mode to 1777 (tmp-style) and recompiled python chromium now compiles fine. not sure if that

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build issue

On 11/22/2013 07:31 PM, Alecks Gates wrote: What kernel are you running and/or what kernel did you build python2.7 with? I would try remerging dev-lang/python:2.7 Possibly relevant: http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 I ran python-updater like Walt suggested, no help. Then I rebuilt

[gentoo-user] Chromium dropping support for NPAPI

News here: http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying-goodbye-to-our-old-friend-npapi.html And the previous one: http://blog.chromium.org/2012/08/the-road-to-safer-more-stable-and.html Currently chromium --- adobe-flash communication in Gentoo works through NPAPI and I don't see the bundled Flash

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium dropping support for NPAPI

On 22/11/13 at 10:24pm, Pavel Volkov wrote: News here: http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying-goodbye-to-our-old-friend-npapi.html And the previous one: http://blog.chromium.org/2012/08/the-road-to-safer-more-stable-and.html Currently chromium --- adobe-flash communication in Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium dropping support for NPAPI

On Saturday 23 November 2013 00:30:45 Yohan Pereira wrote: I think your looking for * www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins Last time I tried it, it didn't work very well. Would keep getting unsupported version of flash etc. Thanks, I installed the flash part from it chrome-binary-plugins. It's

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium build issue

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:19 PM, james N. ja...@flatlan.net wrote: Hey list, I have a build issue with chromium on one machine but not the other. The version I'm trying to build is www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19 but the problem occurs on the current stable version also (31.0.1650.57). *

[gentoo-user] chromium build issue

Hey list, I have a build issue with chromium on one machine but not the other. The version I'm trying to build is www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19 but the problem occurs on the current stable version also (31.0.1650.57). * ERROR: www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19::gentoo failed (configure

[gentoo-user] Chromium: questions

I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile. I run it like this: % chromium --user-data-dir=dir Directory dir is empty (at first launch). After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I visited those before, but it's not everything I visited.

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: questions

On 30/07/13 at 12:11pm, Pavel Volkov wrote: I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile. I run it like this: % chromium --user-data-dir=dir Directory dir is empty (at first launch). After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I visited

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: questions

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.comwrote: Just a hunch but have you signed into Chromium with your google account ? Google has this feature/anti-feature (based on your outlook) where it syncs bookmarks, history among other things with their servers so you

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: questions

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Pavel Volkov negai...@gmail.com wrote: I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile. I run it like this: % chromium --user-data-dir=dir Directory dir is empty (at first launch). After the first launch, some entries immediately appear

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium: questions

On Tuesday 30 Jul 2013 09:11:37 Pavel Volkov wrote: I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile. I run it like this: % chromium --user-data-dir=dir Directory dir is empty (at first launch). After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I

[gentoo-user] chromium print bug?

Does anyone else's chromium get a little crazy when they try to bring up the print dialog without a printer attached? - Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] chromium print bug?

Just try, and chromium get crazy too. I'm using chromium 24.0.1312.5 with KDE by the way. 2012/11/11 Grant emailgr...@gmail.com Does anyone else's chromium get a little crazy when they try to bring up the print dialog without a printer attached? - Grant

[gentoo-user] Chromium and Google Chrome

Dear All, In the morning after I have synced my portage I saw there is a google-chrome and chromium package. The version numbers are the same. I watched the websites and basically they are the same. Google Chrome is the Chrome browser and the Chromium is the open source project. I would like to

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium and Google Chrome

On Friday 02 Sep 2011 09:27:09 András Csányi wrote: Dear All, In the morning after I have synced my portage I saw there is a google-chrome and chromium package. The version numbers are the same. I watched the websites and basically they are the same. Google Chrome is the Chrome browser and

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium and Google Chrome

On 2 September 2011 03:45, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 02 Sep 2011 09:27:09 András Csányi wrote: Dear All, In the morning after I have synced my portage I saw there is a google-chrome and chromium package. The version numbers are the same. I watched the

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium and Google Chrome

On 2 September 2011 09:45, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote: This is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_chrome Chromium implements a similar feature set as Chrome, but lacks built-in automatic updates, built-in PDF reader and Google branding, and most noticeably has a

Re: [gentoo-user] Chromium and Google Chrome

On 2 September 2011 10:17, JD Horelick jdho...@gmail.com wrote: Also, one is a binary, one is source that you need to compile. And Chromium is an EXTREMELY long compile I agree it takes long time (1-2 hours on my machine) but the compile time doesn't matter for me. I upgrade my machine

  1   2   >