Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:27:39 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, be careful when you parse the output of the command. Most of the
.pyc and .pyo files in the python2.5 directories are byte-compiled
version that python generated dynamically the first time
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:53:52 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not quite correct: .py[co] are generated by emerge right after
package installaton and these won't come back unless you use these libs
as root, since python won't have write access to these paths and will
be
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 02:27:39 Dale wrote:
That's sort of what I was thinking. It was generated when it was
started up the first time. I also noticed some things that I installed
in the Seamonkey directory too. Adblock was one of those.
Tho there was a good many of them, I suspect most
Willie Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
which avoids checking all the symlinks.
In case that you find implementation works correctly, this will
not change anything unless either /usr/lib or /lib are symlinks.
If you however use find
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:05:05 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
which avoids checking all the symlinks.
In case that you find implementation works correctly, this will
not change anything unless either /usr/lib or /lib are symlinks.
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:27:39 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, be careful when you parse the output of the command. Most of the
.pyc and .pyo files in the python2.5 directories are byte-compiled
version that python generated dynamically the first time they are
used. For
On Montag 08 Juni 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
zsh: argument list too long: qfile
bash
energy ~ # qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
bash: /usr/bin/qfile: Argument list too long
bash
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Montag 08 Juni 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
zsh: argument list too long: qfile
This is not a zsh limitation but a Linux limitation.
You
On Dienstag 09 Juni 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Montag 08 Juni 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
zsh: argument list too long: qfile
Mickaël Bucas mbu...@gmail.com wrote:
You may avoid the problem with find . -exec prog args {} +
The right way to handle any size for the list returned by find, is
by using xargs :
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs -d'\n' qfile --orphans
No, this is definitely wrong: the right way to
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:04:41 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
This is not a zsh limitation but a Linux limitation.
You may have longer arg lists if you use Solaris ;-)
You may avoid the problem with find . -exec prog args {} +
ah, thank you - I just copied from Neil (and had a look
2009/6/9 Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de:
Mickaël Bucas mbu...@gmail.com wrote:
You may avoid the problem with find . -exec prog args {} +
The right way to handle any size for the list returned by find, is
by using xargs :
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs -d'\n'
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
If it's been around 19 years, why doesn't Google know anything about it?
What is it?
from the manpage of find, it even compares it to the xargs method:
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec action runs the specified
2009/6/9 Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Montag 08 Juni 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
qfile --orphans $(find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f)
zsh: argument list too
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:15:21 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs -d'\n' qfile --orphans
No, this is definitely wrong: the right way to handle this is execplus
(since 19 years).
If it's been around 19 years, why doesn't Google know anything about it?
What
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:04:41 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
This is not a zsh limitation but a Linux limitation.
You may have longer arg lists if you use Solaris ;-)
You may avoid the problem with find . -exec prog args {} +
ah,
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:42:34 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the
selected files, but the command line is built by appending each
selected file name at the end; the total number of invocations of the
command will be
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:42:34 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the
selected files, but the command line is built by appending each
selected file name at the end; the total
On Tuesday 9 June 2009, 16:36, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:15:21 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs -d'\n' qfile --orphans
No, this is definitely wrong: the right way to handle this is
execplus (since 19 years).
If it's been around 19
On Tuesday 9 June 2009, 16:52, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:42:34 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec action runs the specified command on the
selected files, but the command line is built by appending each
selected file name at the end;
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:21:32 +0200, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
command file 1 file 2 file 3
or
command file 1 file 2 file 3
The latter.
Thanks, and bye-bye xargs (not that I used it very often).
--
Neil Bothwick
Cross-country skiing is great in small countries.
signature.asc
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:59:39 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
How does this handle quoted filenames?
correctly.
Are you part Vorlon ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who
think.(Horace Walpole)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 17:20:49 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Tuesday 9 June 2009, 16:36, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:15:21 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs -d'\n' qfile --orphans
No, this is definitely wrong: the right way to handle this
Hi,
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine who's
install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in /usr/lib/*.so.* ; do equery belongs $I ; done
which strikes me as being a tad overkill...
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:44:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine
who's install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in /usr/lib/*.so.* ; do equery belongs $I ; done
qfile --orphans /usr/lib/*.so.*
or,
On Monday 08 June 2009 22:54:08 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:44:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine
who's install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in /usr/lib/*.so.* ; do equery
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2009 22:54:08 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:44:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine
who's install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:54:08PM +0100, Penguin Lover Neil Bothwick squawked:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:44:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine
who's install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:44:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the orphaned libs on and old machine
who's install dates back to 2004? The only idea I can come up with is
for I in /usr/lib/*.so.* ; do equery belongs $I ; done
qfile
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:52:23PM -0500, Penguin Lover Dale squawked:
Questions: You knew I subscribed to this list. lol I ran the command:
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs qfile -o
and I got a lot of hits. I'm just going to post snippets of the
directories here. It is a LONG
Willie Wong wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:52:23PM -0500, Penguin Lover Dale squawked:
Questions: You knew I subscribed to this list. lol I ran the command:
find -H /usr/lib /lib -type f | xargs qfile -o
and I got a lot of hits. I'm just going to post snippets of the
directories
31 matches
Mail list logo