On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> I think I've gotten burned out talking about the advantages of systemd
> on Gentoo lists. If anybody wants to chat about it feel free to ping
> me via email or irc, but not in a channel.
You're giving up far too early!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Perhaps somebody with more systemd expertise will now feel compelled to
> respond ;-) .
I think I've gotten burned out talking about the advantages of systemd
on Gentoo lists. If anybody wants to chat about it feel free to
On Tuesday 14 June 2016 06:46:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote:
>> wabe gmail.com> writes:
>> Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have
>> it's merits.
>
>Serious question: What makes systemd more suitable to manage 1000 linux
J. Roeleveld antarean.org> writes:
>
> On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote:
> > wabe gmail.com> writes:
> > Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have
> > it's merits.
> Serious question: What makes systemd more suitable to manage 1000 linux
>
On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote:
> wabe gmail.com> writes:
> Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have
> it's merits.
Serious question: What makes systemd more suitable to manage 1000 linux
workstations when compared to, for instance, OpenRC?
--
wabe gmail.com> writes:
> waltdnes waltdnes.org wrote:
> I'm glad that gentoo users still have an alternative to systemd, and
> hope that this will also be the case in future.
Non Systemd has a very bright future. In clustering, Systemd is ok, even
great for containers. In Hi Performance
Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 10:00 AM, Dale wrote:
> > waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:16:57AM -0500, Dale wrote
> >>> k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Dale:
> ...
> > Can a system even boot without udev?
> Yes, use
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 10:18:01PM -0400, Jonathan Callen wrote
> Actually, you no longer need a user-space device manager at all, unless
> you want to be able to access device nodes under /dev as a user that
> isn't UID=0 or has CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE. The kernel provides a devtmpfs
> filesystem that
Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 10:00 AM, Dale wrote:
>> waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:16:57AM -0500, Dale wrote
k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Dale:
> ...
>> Can a system even boot without udev?
> Yes, use sys-fs/static-dev (unless you have
On 06/09/2016 10:00 AM, Dale wrote:
> waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:16:57AM -0500, Dale wrote
>>> k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Dale:
...
> Can a system even boot without udev?
Yes, use sys-fs/static-dev (unless you have some special boot
10 matches
Mail list logo