On 6/16/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Suppose you've got the following "use case": Install all of
>
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Suppose you've got the following "use case": Install all of
> KDE, but leave out PPP stuff.
>
> How would you solve that?
I
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] Re: Finer grained kde*-meta packages':
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Sorry for not being clearer. I meant USE flags in the -meta ebuilds, to
> disable undesired apps like kppp. Sort of like:
>
> DEPEND="
> kde-base/this-app
> !nokppp? ( kde-base/kppp )
> kde-base/tha
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > and a
> > mechanism to put use flags into split ebuilds and let the devs
> > decide which ones are worth persuing?
>
> With "split ebuilds" you mean for example the ebuild for kppp? Or
> are you talking about the kde*-meta ebuilds?
Sorry for not b
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> > Perhaps the best route (maybe a good feature request?) is to put
>> > USE flags in the -meta ebuilds.
>>
>> That's what I'd like to get as a result of
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182106
>
On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Perhaps the best route (maybe a good feature request?) is to put
> > USE flags in the -meta ebuilds.
>
> That's what I'd like to get as a result of
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182106
I see we're thinking along the same lines. Now, how
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> I mean, what's the advantage of the kde*-meta packages over the kde
>> package, when the kde*-meta require just as much "junk", as the
>> kde package does? Hm, really, what's the use of the kde*-meta packa
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yep. You get kde-meta or individual kde packages or you get your own
> ebuild that depends on a number of KDE packages. The Gentoo developers do
> quite a bit of work just to give us
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I completely agree with Alexander about this. Meta (not only the kde ones)
> packages should definitely have USE flags.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182106
Let's see how fast Jakub is to close that bug...
In that bug, I'm only talking about
10 matches
Mail list logo
