Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that
emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being used, even if you
keep 4.9 (or 4.8) as the default compiler.
If you should really get problems with this, you can manually
remove the
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
On 21/04/15 20:09, james wrote:
[installing gcc 5 system-wide through portage]
This is not my intention, system wide...
Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that
emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being
On 21/04/15 20:09, james wrote:
[installing gcc 5 system-wide through portage]
Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that
emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being used, even if you
keep 4.9 (or 4.8) as the default compiler.
This is not really guaranteed to
Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 07:51:30 schrieb james:
I'll wait at least until there is an ebuild of some kind. Those folks
(toolchain) that put out the 5.0.x builds should have one for 5.1
soon.. I do agree with the subliminal suggestion that I should
find those gcc compile and
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes:
On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be
typo) from toolchain overlay
to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached.
It worked just fine here.
very cool! thx.
I now
On 23.04.2015 19:18, james wrote:
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes:
I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ... and maybe later I will try
at system in a btrfs-subvolume.
Hello Stephan,
Very interesting.
emerge -e @system
didn't get very far in my btrfs-subvolume (a
On 23.04.2015 23:06, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I am sure it will enter portage soon ...
btw ... there you go:
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-5.1.0.ebuild?view=markup
On 04/23/2015 07:51:30 AM, james wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
So is my best hope the toolchain repo ?
You can always compile and install locally in your $HOME directory.
5.1
was just released, so you can try that.
I hear you. It'd take me a long time to
On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be typo)
from toolchain overlay
to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached.
It worked just fine here.
same here, just a bit later ;-)
I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ...
On 04/22/15 12:37, james wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
Lack of a version number always suggests latest master branch.
Good to know.
However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed
to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
Lack of a version number always suggests latest master branch.
Good to know.
However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed
to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For all you know,
that live ebuild can
On 21/04/15 21:14, james wrote:
How do you tell if a ~ is actually based on the nightlies,
5.1 or is just old ebuild with the . extension somebody never
got around to renaming or deleting?
are live ebuilds. Not based on any release or nightlies. They
download the code from a
On 22/04/15 17:58, james wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
On 21/04/15 21:14, james wrote:
How do you tell if a ~ is actually based on the nightlies,
5.1 or is just old ebuild with the . extension somebody never
got around to renaming or deleting?
are live
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
On 21/04/15 21:14, james wrote:
How do you tell if a ~ is actually based on the nightlies,
5.1 or is just old ebuild with the . extension somebody never
got around to renaming or deleting?
are live ebuilds. Not based on any
On 22/04/15 19:37, james wrote:
So is my best hope the toolchain repo ?
Do drop me a short message, if there is a live or 5.1 gcc somewhere.
I'm itching (really bad) to test RDMA on Cephfs with some in-memory
codes, on my gentoo_GPU_linux_cluster_hack...
You can always compile and
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
So is my best hope the toolchain repo ?
You can always compile and install locally in your $HOME directory. 5.1
was just released, so you can try that.
I hear you. It'd take me a long time to figure out the settings, configs
and such. Beside I
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:09:37 + (UTC), james wrote:
Also, I have not found a gcc-5.0 or gcc-5.1 in an overlay (yet),
eix -R -e gcc shows several options, the mpst recent of which appears to
be 5.0.0_alpha20150322 from the toolchain
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
eix -R -e gcc shows several options, the mpst recent of which appears to
be 5.0.0_alpha20150322 from the toolchain overlay.
Interesting situation. I have about half a dozen overlays set up
via layman. Zugaina does not cleanly sync for me:
snip
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:19 + (UTC), james wrote:
Do our overlay lists matchup completely? Does the -R always check
the latest, or is their some updating syntax to ensure the remotes
are updated?
eix-remote update
--
Neil Bothwick
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical
19 matches
Mail list logo
