Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:35:44 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Anyway, you don't need to add something to remind you of the partition's position; /etc/mtab will use regular device names, so you can see what's going on with 'cat /etc/mtab' or simply 'mount' without parameters. cfdisk also

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Nikos! On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Alan Mackenzie wrote: The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*. I'm totally confused. Doesn't sd* mean SCSI disk drive? When I was installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Mick
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote: So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15 partitions on a drive. From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI drives. For ATA drives I think it is 63? Not sure if this is a Linux OS

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:05:10 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15 partitions on a drive. It's a bit like the old MS-DOS restriction to 512 MB all over again. Hey, guys, hard drives nowadays are like 200 gig, not 512meg.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Mick, On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Mick wrote: On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote: So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15 partitions on a drive. From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI drives.

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Mick wrote: [...] What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without legacy ATA drivers, how would I know what my devices will be seen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Mick wrote: [...] What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without legacy ATA drivers, how would I know

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Mick wrote: [...] What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without legacy ATA drivers, how

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Mick wrote: [...] What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Alan Mackenzie wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: The CD/DVD-ROM can show up as /dev/sd* even with the old legacy drivers if you have enable SCSI Emulation for it. In any event, try to build a new kernel using the new drivers. The old legacy driver

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Mick
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Mick wrote: [...] What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess about with it. If I were to

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Dale wrote: [...] Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or any other bootable CD, would those labels still be there? The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Dale wrote: [...] Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or any other bootable CD, would those labels still be there? The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For example, when

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then. I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to have to

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Dale wrote: Dale wrote: True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then. I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Mick wrote: On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD (which uses the legacy drivers, meaning /dev/hd* instead of /dev/sd*) the labels are there and I can mount

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Alan Mackenzie wrote: Hi, Gentoo? I've a newly installed system, now working with my own special optimiesed keyboard layout. :-) However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them works, because I installed Gentoo from it. When I do mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom , it

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Miernik
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0 This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard drives are (don't ask!)). Maybe there was some /dev/sda /dev/sdb or something similar? Why

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Nikos, On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06:15PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Alan Mackenzie wrote: However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them works, because I installed Gentoo from it. When I do mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom , it comes back with special

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Miernik, On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Miernik wrote: Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0 This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard drives are (don't

[gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Alan Mackenzie wrote: The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*. I'm totally confused. Doesn't sd* mean SCSI disk drive? When I was installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as /dev/sdb5. When I built my own kernel, it needed /dev/hdh5. This seems crazy. Is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mount: special device /dev/hdc does not exist. What does this mean?

2008-07-19 Thread Graham Murray
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's /dev/sda and /dev/sda1, and no other /dev/sd*. That's where my UBS stick gets mounted. What about any /dev/sr*?