Re: [gentoo-user] Remove NetworkManager without breaking cinnamon ?

You should start a new thread for your topic, instead of replying to an existing thread to avoid messing up messages listed by thread. Regarding your question: Cinnamon has a hardwired dependency on networkmanager. I understand you can mask the networkmanager service or remove it, but bits

[gentoo-user] Remove NetworkManager without breaking cinnamon ?

Hi, (i'm a endUser) i try to remove NetworkManager but it's seems to have somes dependencies with cinnamon-control-center ? It's possible without break cinnamon or worst ...? Cheers. Rumpelstilschien

[gentoo-user] Remove codepoints from fonts with fontconfig

Hi, i added a colour emoji font as my last preferred font to fontconfig and want to get all emojis from it. The problem is, that my first preferred font contains some mono coloured emojis that override the colour emoji font. This is my config: monospace Source Code Pro

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 20:22 -0400, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I am trying to avoid installing rust and prevent emerge --update > --deep world from installing it again. > How to do this ? > 1. Switch away from Mozilla products. Evolution is a great Thunderbird alternative, and Epiphany is a

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

On 12/05/2022 02:41, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: And yes, the compile time is one of the factors in not wanting it on my system. The second factor is a natural reaction toward feeling that I am forced to have it. Another reason is the growing collection of compilers and development tools and their

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 22:24 -0400, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > a choice would be to just go with firefox-bin if not rust-bin. I went with rust-bin because lots of GTK programs (evince, gimp, deluge) as well as some other miscellaneous utilities rely on librsvg which requires rust. So, since I need

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

Cal, like I said, gentoo has always been about choices. I am not blaming anyone for anything. At the end of the day, it is open source, and the work done by the community is highly appreciated. I am sorry it was understood the other way around. The frustration level grows when I have too many

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

On 5/11/22 18:41, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > Miles, > Thank you for your response. The idea of "getting harder and harder" > is hard to accept. Gentoo has always been about having choice> Firefox > requires rust, but is there a way to disable this ? > There must be another way to let the user

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

Thank you both Julien and Miles for your help. I got the list I wanted, and I can go ahead with removing rust. On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:25 PM Julien Roy wrote: > > You need to remove all packages that depend on virtual/rust > To see which ones do, run `emerge -pv --depclean virtual/rust` > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

Miles, Thank you for your response. The idea of "getting harder and harder" is hard to accept. Gentoo has always been about having choices. Firefox requires rust, but is there a way to disable this ? There must be another way to let the user decide if they need it or not ! And yes, the compile

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

If your *reason* for wanting to remove rust is the compile time, bear in mind there is also a rust-bin package these days. There are an increasingly large number of major packages that have rust as a dependency, so it's getting harder and harder to get away from. Obviously anything from the

[gentoo-user] Remove rust completely

I am trying to avoid installing rust and prevent emerge --update --deep world from installing it again. How to do this ?

Re: [gentoo-user] remove from list please

You should send a mail to gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org in order to unsubscribe from the list. Regards, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera

[gentoo-user] remove from list please

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

Am Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:48:57 +0200 schrieb Raffaele Belardi : > I might give Xfce a try. I did not find any definitive resource on the > web stating that LXDE is dead. There are some recent commits on the > sourceforge repo so it looks still alive (although not kickin').

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 23:20 +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:55:22 +0200 > schrieb Raffaele Belardi : > > > 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager > > You don't need to uninstall networkmanager except you want to > uninstall > it for some other reasons. It

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 18:31 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 17:55:22 CEST schrieb Raffaele > Belardi: > > After several months of Gnome3 I decided it is too heavy for my old > > workstation and would like to go back to LXDE. The flow could be: > > > > 1. rebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

On 09/12/2017 03:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400 > schrieb Mike Gilbert : > >> I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely >> to break things (like sys-fs/udev). > > No, it's not. > > I'd consider it a bug if systemd is

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400 schrieb Mike Gilbert : > I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely > to break things (like sys-fs/udev). No, it's not. I'd consider it a bug if systemd is not installed and another package that doesn't depend on

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Just to be absolutely sure put this line into > your /etc/portage/make.conf, too: > INSTALL_MASK="/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd /usr/lib/systemd > /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/systemd /etc/systemd" I

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:55:22 +0200 schrieb Raffaele Belardi : > 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager You don't need to uninstall networkmanager except you want to uninstall it for some other reasons. It doesn't need gnome or systemd. > 5. emerge -N lxde-meta I'd prefer

Re: [gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 17:55:22 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi: > After several months of Gnome3 I decided it is too heavy for my old > workstation and would like to go back to LXDE. The flow could be: > > 1. rebuild kernel with openRC support and install > 2. emerge -C gnome

[gentoo-user] remove gnome/systemd

After several months of Gnome3 I decided it is too heavy for my old workstation and would like to go back to LXDE. The flow could be: 1. rebuild kernel with openRC support and install 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager 3. emerge -C systemd 4. change profile to generic desktop (non-Gnome) 5. emerge

[gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

Hello everyone, I am attempting to remove the default 'gentoo' repository definition from my list of repositories. Even though I am using a custom repos.conf in /etc/portage, I see that portage is including the default 'gentoo' entry from /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf. Is there any way I

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:42:42 -0700 Alex Crawford alex.crawf...@coreos.com wrote: I am attempting to remove the default 'gentoo' repository definition from my list of repositories. Even though I am using a custom repos.conf in /etc/portage, I see that portage is including the default 'gentoo'

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove default 'gentoo' repo in repos.conf

Thanks for the suggestions. I'd rather not modify /usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf if I can help it and /usr/portage is completely empty in my installation. I've been toying around with adding a 'deleted' attribute to the repository section. I'll start a discussion in the portage dev channel.

[gentoo-user] remove fancy framebuffer on boot

Hello, I have a new laptop and when it boots after the initial start up the output goes from a larger text to something very small with the penguins displayed. My desktop doesn't do this and I am pretty sure that I shut if off there and I don't remember what I did and my searches haven't turned

Re: [gentoo-user] remove fancy framebuffer on boot

Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012, 11:22:08 schrieb Tami King: Hello, I have a new laptop and when it boots after the initial start up the output goes from a larger text to something very small with the penguins displayed. My desktop doesn't do this and I am pretty sure that I shut if off there

Re: [gentoo-user] remove fancy framebuffer on boot

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:22:08 -0500, Tami King wrote: I have a new laptop and when it boots after the initial start up the output goes from a larger text to something very small with the penguins displayed. That sounds like kernel modesetting (KMS), disable it by adding nomodeset to the

[gentoo-user] Remove

On 7/6/12 2:05 AM, gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: Topics (messages 139628 through 139677): [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo Laptop Looks to be Trashed 139628 - Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo Laptop Looks to be Trashed 139629 - Philip Webb

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove

On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:35:23 -0400, Robert Herr wrote: On 7/6/12 2:05 AM, gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: Topics (messages 139628 through 139677): [massive snip] This list is for two type of people: Those who can read documentation well enough to be able to enjoy Gentoo. Those who

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove

On Friday 06 Jul 2012 21:28:08 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:35:23 -0400, Robert Herr wrote: On 7/6/12 2:05 AM, gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: Topics (messages 139628 through 139677): [massive snip] This list is for two type of people: Those who can read

[gentoo-user] remove bookmarks in pdf [was renumber pages]

on 2011-04-02 at 19:38 Willie Wong wrote: look at app-text/pdfjam hi, thanks for the suggestion, although i couldn't find any command appropriate to what i want to do. BTW, i have another one: how to remove all bookmarks form a pdf? (from the command line, i mean)

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wednesday 15 December 2010 19:24:22 Pau Peris wrote: n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`; for i in `seq 1 $n`;do pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`; echo -e Packages depending on $pkg. /tmp/auditWorldFile.log equery d $pkg

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

The following lines creates an auditWorldFile.log log file which will show packages requires by other packages, so theones you can safely remove. #!/bin/bash n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`; for i in `seq 1 $n`;do pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`;

[gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not contained in world. My current attempt would be to write a script which executes emerge -vpc on each entry in world. If it wouldn't be removed

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not contained in world. My current attempt would be to

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On 12/08/10 14:40:56, Matthew Summers wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not contained in world. My current attempt would be to

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

Apparently, though unproven, at 17:22 on Wednesday 08 December 2010, Helmut Jarausch did opine thusly: On 12/08/10 14:40:56, Matthew Summers wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:57 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not contained in world. My current attempt would be to write a script which executes emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On 8/12/2010, at 4:11pm, Albert Hopkins wrote: ... I have a script I used to locate redudancies in the world file. It requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that have reverse dependencies also in world (but only goes one level deep). Just # auditworld

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:28 +, Stroller wrote: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/302273/ I think this only works on ~ARCH, right? On x86 I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./auditworld, line 20, in module import gentoolkit.sets ImportError: No module named sets

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On 12/08/10 17:11:58, Albert Hopkins wrote: I have a script I used to locate redudancies in the world file. It requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that have reverse dependencies also in world (but only goes one level deep). Just # auditworld

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.ukwrote: On 8/12/2010, at 4:11pm, Albert Hopkins wrote: ... I have a script I used to locate redudancies in the world file. It requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that have reverse

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

Are you sure it's even it gentoolkit? I have that but no auditworld on x86. It's not in gentoolkit-dev either. It's not IN gentoolkit, it NEEDS gentoolkit. It is here: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/302273/ Greetings Sebastian Beßler

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:22:13 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Sorry, but I still don't see it. The main question is which packages might be removed from 'world'? If you don't use it directly, it should probably be removed - so lib* for a start. Then run emerge --depclean -p and see what would be

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove redundant entries in world - howto

On 12/08/2010 12:23 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Hi, does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from /var/lib/portage/world which would have been pulled in anyway even if they were not contained in world. My current attempt would be to write a script which executes emerge -vpc

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:22:19 -0600, Dale wrote: True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a lot of cleaning to do as well. I clean mine every few months and it still has some size to the output. That's why I run it every week :) You got to much time

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:11:49 -0600, Dale wrote: eix-test-obsolete Be prepared for a LONG list tho. It prints a LOT on mine. That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P -- Neil Bothwick I wonder how much deeper would the ocean be without sponges. signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:11:49 -0600, Dale wrote: eix-test-obsolete Be prepared for a LONG list tho. It prints a LOT on mine. That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P True but if the OP hasn't

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:01:47 -0600, Dale wrote: That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a lot of cleaning to do as well. I clean mine every few months and it still has some size to the output. That's why

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:01:47 -0600, Dale wrote: That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a lot of cleaning to do as well. I

[gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

hi, I'd like to remove unneeded entries on package.keywords and I was wondering if there's some program to do that (or if it's a good idea for me to try to do it :) ). for example, I may have: =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.6 but later (hopefully) this package will be unmasked and that entry

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: hi, I'd like to remove unneeded entries on package.keywords and I was wondering if there's some program to do that (or if it's a good idea for me to try to do it :) ). for example, I may have: =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.6

Re: [gentoo-user] remove unneeded package.keywords entries

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:56:43 -0200 Crístian Viana wrote: for example, I may have: =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.6 but later (hopefully) this package will be unmasked and that entry becomes totally useless. # emerge eix # eix-test-obsolete -d

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove stranded gcc-config's?

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jacob Toddjaketodd...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still have gcc-4.1.2 but the

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove stranded gcc-config's?

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked: dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver !!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom. !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details. dragonfly ~ # dragonfly ~ # eix pack-ver No matches found. dragonfly ~ # The

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove stranded gcc-config's?

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Willie Wongww...@math.princeton.edu wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked: dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver !!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom. !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.

[gentoo-user] Remove stranded gcc-config's?

I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain. How would I remove these? Thanks, Mark dragonfly ~ # gcc-config -l [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.3

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove stranded gcc-config's?

On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain. How would I remove these?

[gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

Hi, I am searching for the opposite of emerge --noreplace atom. I forgot -1 and now the package is part of the world file. It does not belong there, it is a dependency I wanted to update. I don't want to run --unmerge and -av1 again. What can I do? kh

Re: [gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is not present in any previous version. Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!) AllenJB KH wrote: Hi, I am searching for the opposite of emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

AllenJB wrote: From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is not present in any previous version. Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!) AllenJB I have done this a few times as well and it

Re: [gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

Dale schrieb: AllenJB wrote: From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is not present in any previous version. Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!) AllenJB I have done this a few times

Re: [gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

On Tue, 05 May 2009 10:00:40 +0200, KH gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de wrote: Dale schrieb: AllenJB wrote: From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is not present in any previous version. Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually edit the

Re: [gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

On Tuesday 05 May 2009 09:44:58 KH wrote: Hi, I am searching for the opposite of emerge --noreplace atom. I forgot -1 and now the package is part of the world file. It does not belong there, it is a dependency I wanted to update. I don't want to run --unmerge and -av1 again. What can I do?

[solved][gentoo-user] remove a package from world without unmerging?

Alan McKinnon schrieb: vi /var/lib/portage/world followed by intelligent use of the / and dd functions in vi :-) rofl

[gentoo-user] remove all kde and start again ...

I have got myself into a bind with kde 3.5.10 and 3.5.9 - I would like to unmerge all kde and then remerge it as 3.5.10. Currently its taken me ages to unmerge packages as I have emereg world, which its just dawned on me is only printing 3 blocking packages at a time - very slow progress Its

Re: [gentoo-user] remove all kde and start again ...

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just remove all kde at once? emerge -C kde-meta emerge --depclean -a -- Neil Bothwick I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder. signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-user] remove all kde and start again ...

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote: I have got myself into a bind with kde 3.5.10 and 3.5.9 - I would like to unmerge all kde and then remerge it as 3.5.10. Currently its taken me ages to unmerge packages as I have emereg world, which its just

Re: [gentoo-user] remove all kde and start again ...

On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 14:04 +0200, Uwe wrote: On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote: I have got myself into a bind with kde 3.5.10 and 3.5.9 - I would like to unmerge all kde and then remerge it as 3.5.10. Currently its taken me ages to unmerge

Re: [gentoo-user] remove all kde and start again ...

On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 12:58 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just remove all kde at once? emerge -C kde-meta emerge --depclean -a Thanks Neil, I used the xarg way

[gentoo-user] remove DHCPCD/djbdns -- and now, manual setup fails...

Hello, list -- I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address. I don't want to do like this anymore, so I removed the package and attempted to configure the interface manually. However, somewhere in my configs dhcp client is still called. How do I fix this? Also, I'd tried

Re: [gentoo-user] remove DHCPCD/djbdns -- and now, manual setup fails...

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:34:27 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote: I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address. I don't want to do like this anymore, so I removed the package and attempted to configure the interface manually. How? We can't guess at what changes you made.

[solved] RE: [gentoo-user] remove DHCPCD/djbdns -- and now, manual setup fails...

-Original Message- From: Michael Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, list -- I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address. I don't want to do like this anymore, so I removed the package and attempted to configure the interface manually. However,

RE: [gentoo-user] remove DHCPCD/djbdns -- and now, manual setup fails...

-Original Message- From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:40 PM On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:34:27 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote: I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address. I don't want to do like this anymore,

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

On Sunday 12 November 2006 20:58, Marco Calviani wrote: Hi list, i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a # prelink -ua can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is enough to behave like

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote: I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party tools is this: emerge -euD world This is slightly amusing. Remerging every package while prelink is

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote: I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party tools is this: emerge -euD world This

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

On Monday 13 November 2006 14:22, Uwe Thiem wrote: On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote: I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

El Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:25 +0200 Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote: I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. The best way to make sure your

[gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

Hi list, i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a # prelink -ua can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is enough to behave like this? Regards, mc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

El Domingo, 12 de Noviembre de 2006 20:58, Marco Calviani escribió: Hi list, i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a # prelink -ua can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is enough to

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

Hi, emerge -euD world but: is this going to recompile everything (e option) or only those that needs upgrade? Regards, mc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

On 12 November 2006 22:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote: I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. Just out of curiosity: Why? As in it doesn't do its job or as in it makes the system unstable? My whole system is prelinked and it is very stable. Startup times of C++

Re: [gentoo-user] REMOVE

On 7/20/06, Nunya Bidness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: REMOVE You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

[gentoo-user] REMOVE

REMOVE

Re: [gentoo-user] REMOVE

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:00, Nunya Bidness wrote: REMOVE NO! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] REMOVE

Jerry McBride wrote: On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:00, Nunya Bidness wrote: REMOVE NO! This may help you get rid of us. O_O To unsubscribe from a list, send an empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In other words, send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Give that a try. Dale :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] remove xorg-server to emerge nvidia-glx =Normal?

On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.99 (is blocking media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8762) [ebuild N] media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8762 USE=-dlloader 0 kB Is this normal... is nvidia-glx a replacement to xorg-server? Actually,

Re: [gentoo-user] remove xorg-server to emerge nvidia-glx =Normal?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to break out of the thread where this is being discussed but I got part way thru some instructions about getting nvidia-glx setup and saw something that looks like it might throw a monkey wrench into things. I've emerged nvidia-kernel without problems. The

[gentoo-user] remove xorg-server to emerge nvidia-glx =Normal?

Sorry to break out of the thread where this is being discussed but I got part way thru some instructions about getting nvidia-glx setup and saw something that looks like it might throw a monkey wrench into things. I've emerged nvidia-kernel without problems. The next step is where I see this:

[gentoo-user] Remove?

Hi all! It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it seems they're not considering me at all! I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nothing happened. Can someone help me? Thank you! --

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove?

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:18, osv wrote: Hi all! It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it seems they're not considering me at all! I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nothing happened. Can

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove?

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:18:49 +0100, osv wrote: I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nothing happened. Did you send them from your subscription address? -- Neil Bothwick By the time you can make ends meet, they move the ends.

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove?

Did you send them from your subscription address? Yes, I'm sure I did. Bwhua!!! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove?

Quoting osv [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all! It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it seems they're not considering me at all! I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I seem to remember a post a while back

Re: [gentoo-user] Remove?

andrew turner schreef: Quoting osv [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all! It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it seems they're not considering me at all! I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I seem to

  1   2   >