Mick wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 12:52:12 Alex Schuster wrote:
Mick writes:
Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable
and a profile.d variable.
None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in
/etc/profile.d/ are sourced in /etc/profile.
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:25 on Thursday 05 May 2011, Alex Schuster
did opine thusly:
Is the number prefix important? Does it have to be 99editor? If so, how
does one discover the correct number for each variable?
Maybe the 99 is what eselect wants the number to be. If you
On Thursday 05 May 2011 09:25:18 Alex Schuster wrote:
Mick wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 12:52:12 Alex Schuster wrote:
Mick writes:
Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable
and a profile.d variable.
None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and
I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
following news item, after syncing this morning:
# eselect news read
2011-05-01-baselayout-update
Title Baselayout update
AuthorChristian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org
Author
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
Thanks for the heads up. :)
It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. I'll be
unmasking and updating a couple of boxen today, taking advantage of some
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:03:11 Thanasis wrote:
I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
following news item, after syncing this morning:
# eselect news read
2011-05-01-baselayout-update
Title Baselayout update
Author
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:43:59 Mick wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:03:11 Thanasis wrote:
I am running default/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib profile, and I got the
following news item, after syncing this morning:
# eselect news read
2011-05-01-baselayout-update
Title
on 05/02/2011 12:43 PM Mick wrote the following:
snip
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml
I've been through the migration guide. In the section about udev it mentions
/etc/runlevels/sysinit. Is this something added by baselayout2/OpenRC? I
don't seem to have this in my
Thanasis wrote:
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
They are giving a heads up that the update is coming. I think it is
going stable in a few days, about a week since the package was added to
stable.
I'm just hoping this will be a clean upgrade. They
on 05/02/2011 01:05 PM Mick wrote the following:
Another thing I found, is some incongruity about the file in which the
$EDITOR
and $PAGER should be defined.
The migration guide says:
The EDITOR variable is no longer found in /etc/rc.conf. Both EDITOR and
PAGER
are set by default in
On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
on 05/02/2011 01:05 PM Mick wrote the following:
Another thing I found, is some incongruity about the file in which the
$EDITOR and $PAGER should be defined.
The migration guide says:
The EDITOR variable is no longer found in /etc/rc.conf.
on 05/02/2011 01:50 PM Mick wrote the following:
snip
Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and a
profile.d variable.
Me neither, but I think you should add it to env.d
In my system only a couple of packages (namely dev-java/java-config and
sys-fs/udisks) use profile.d
All
Mick writes:
On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and
a profile.d variable.
None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in /etc/profile.d/
are sourced in /etc/profile. profile.env contains all stuff in
On Monday 02 May 2011 12:52:12 Alex Schuster wrote:
Mick writes:
On Monday 02 May 2011 11:26:27 you wrote:
Thanks. Not sure if there is a difference between an env.d variable and
a profile.d variable.
None you will notice, both /etc/profile.env and scripts in /etc/profile.d/
are
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
Thanks for the heads up. :)
It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. I'll be
On Monday 02 May 2011 18:11:01 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote:
Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch.
Thanks for the heads up. :)
It seems then that
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I've unmasked the latest available after reading the changelogs:
sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.2
sys-apps/openrc-0.8.2-r1
All seems to work fine here.
--
Regards,
Mick
baselayout-2.0.2 seems like the obvious
On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:11:01 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask?
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
--
Neil Bothwick
Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
-- Robert Heinlein
signature.asc
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:11:01 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask?
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that
On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but what command
do I run today to unmask the version level they will make stable next
week? (For instance 0.7 instead of
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but what command
do I run today to unmask the
Hey Mark,
the news item does not tell the exact version because there might be sub/rc-
versions until release. so on release date the devs will remove keywords of
the right versions. i read the dev mailing list a bit and it should be
baselayout-2.0.2 + openrc-0.8.2-r1
if no further -rc will be
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge?
I use ~amd64 portage so I
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Mick wrote:
I've unmasked the latest available after reading the changelogs:
sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.2
sys-apps/openrc-0.8.2-r1
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295613
You are correct about the versions.
William
pgpoZK7YWDjzo.pgp
On Monday 02 May 2011 23:07:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Does stable portage support the
26 matches
Mail list logo
