Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/30/20 9:35 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 08:46, n952162 wrote: Well, yes, the current version, indeed requires python3_8. The version that was installed on my system, however, to be updated, listed python3_7 in the PYTHON_TARGETS section. That was the only difference

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 07:22:34 GMT n952162 wrote: > On 12/30/20 1:05 AM, Michael wrote: > > On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 22:55:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: > So, I tried to do an emerge on @system. I got another slot conflict! >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 08:46, n952162 wrote: > Well, yes, the current version, indeed requires python3_8. The version > that was installed on my system, however, to be updated, listed > python3_7 in the PYTHON_TARGETS section. That was the only difference > between the two packages in the

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/30/20 1:05 AM, Michael wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 22:55:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: So, I tried to do an emerge on @system. I got another slot conflict! This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/30/20 1:05 AM, Michael wrote: On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 22:55:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: So, I tried to do an emerge on @system. I got another slot conflict! This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/30/20 1:21 AM, Dale wrote: Michael wrote: I expect in a few weeks the tree will settle on python3_9, so all this rinse and repeat exercise with all the python updates should hopefully go quiet. :-) It may not be a bad idea for the OP to sync again and see if that helps.  It's rare but

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

Michael wrote: > > I expect in a few weeks the tree will settle on python3_9, so all this rinse > and repeat exercise with all the python updates should hopefully go quiet. :-) It may not be a bad idea for the OP to sync again and see if that helps.  It's rare but in the past I've caught the

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 22:55:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: > > > So, I tried to do an emerge on @system. I got another slot conflict! > > > This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of > > > interest". It's only

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:16:11 +0100, n952162 wrote: > > So, I tried to do an emerge on @system.  I got another slot conflict! > > This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of > > interest".  It's only transgression: PYTHON_TARGET containing > > python3_7. > Note that both

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

n952162 wrote: > On 12/29/20 11:07 PM, n952162 wrote: >> >> >> So, I tried to do an emerge on @system.  I got another slot conflict! >> This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of >> interest".  It's only transgression: PYTHON_TARGET containing python3_7. >> >> > > Note

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/29/20 11:07 PM, n952162 wrote: So, I tried to do an emerge on @system.  I got another slot conflict! This time for mako, which I'd seen go by sometimes as a "package of interest".  It's only transgression: PYTHON_TARGET containing python3_7. Note that both the "scheduled for merge"

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS]

On 12/3/20 9:33 PM, n952162 wrote: I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? I tried and tried to figure out how I could determine what the fatal slot conflict would be.  No matter how I mixed things,

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sunday, 13 December 2020 10:07:42 GMT n952162 wrote: > If rust, llvm, firefox or thunderbird is in that list, I'll go crazy. You can avoid compiling rust by 'emerge -1 rust-bin && emerge -C rust'. I do that because it consumes huge amounts of resources and is only used in firefox building -

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/14/20 1:04 AM, Michael wrote: If you're running a stable system then you should not *need* to define a particular python version or python target manually in your USE preferences configuration and you should not need to add python or any lib packages in general, in your

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 10:39 PM, antlists wrote: On 13/12/2020 21:02, n952162 wrote: My problem is I can't find a diagnostic methodology.  The one I most often hear is, update more often, or trail and error solutions. Although I haven't yet had the grief of something like this python thing, I've always

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 10:31 PM, Dale wrote: I've seen some say to start at the bottom, then work your way up.  Even with that, it doesn't help me understand it most times. It would be cool if the attached vim coloration script would be useful for somebody. " vim: tw=0 syn match maskedinstalled "^-

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

That's good.  I'll do that On 12/13/20 10:40 PM, Dale wrote: n952162 wrote: On 12/13/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/13/20 9:06 PM, Dale wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote: On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: Nearly 2

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sunday, 13 December 2020 21:10:14 GMT n952162 wrote: > On 12/13/20 10:55 AM, Michael wrote: > > On Sunday, 13 December 2020 08:57:53 GMT n952162 wrote: > >> $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python3_6/p' /etc/portage/package.use/* > >> > >>> =dev-python/certifi-10001-r1 python_targets_python3_6 >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 22:02:44 +0100, n952162 wrote: > My problem is I can't find a diagnostic methodology.  The one I most > often hear is, update more often, or trail and error solutions. Neither of which is a diagnostic methodology. > Does all that information in emerge's output point the way

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:58:40 +0100, n952162 wrote: > > Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. > Okay, is the solution then to re-install? Reinstalling is never a solution, just a way to run away from the problem, until it happens again. The solution is to work through the

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 11:07:42AM +0100, n952162 wrote > > If rust, llvm, firefox or thunderbird is in that list, I'll go crazy. You can "unmerge rust", followed by "emerge rust-bin" as a drop-in replacement. The same option is possible with firefox-bin, but firefox-bin is hard-coded to

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

n952162 wrote: > On 12/13/20 10:55 AM, Michael wrote: >> On Sunday, 13 December 2020 08:57:53 GMT n952162 wrote: >>> On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated >> for quite some time. > The (compressed) log of 

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

n952162 wrote: > On 12/13/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote: >> On 12/13/20 9:06 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Mark Knecht wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 >>> > wrote: > On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 13/12/2020 21:02, n952162 wrote: My problem is I can't find a diagnostic methodology.  The one I most often hear is, update more often, or trail and error solutions. Although I haven't yet had the grief of something like this python thing, I've always found that unmerging everything that

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

n952162 wrote: > On 12/13/20 9:06 PM, Dale wrote: >> >> I agree.  I update once a week.  It seems a pretty good balance between >> not having to do it to often and not having such drastic changes that it >> makes things hard to work through. >> >> That said, when the tree is in the process of huge

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/13/20 9:06 PM, Dale wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote: On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. Okay, is the solution then

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 10:55 AM, Michael wrote: On Sunday, 13 December 2020 08:57:53 GMT n952162 wrote: On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated for quite some time. The (compressed) log of a system and world update from 20.

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 9:06 PM, Dale wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote: On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. Okay, is the solution then to re-install? Personally I

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:52, n952162 wrote: > > I have this funny pkg entry in the emerge log: > > dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)] > required by (dev-python/ipaddress-1.0.23:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="" > ABI_X86="(64)"

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 > wrote: > > > > On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > > > Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. > > > > > > > > > > Okay, is the solution then to re-install? > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 11:31 AM, n952162 wrote: On 12/13/20 1:09 AM, Dan Egli wrote: Have to agree with Neil on this one. You've got a LOT of updates. World is great, but start with emerge -UDuv @system, after you find the culprit that is still setting python3_6 as a target. Once the system emerge is done

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

I have this funny pkg entry in the emerge log: dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)] required by (dev-python/ipaddress-1.0.23:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7" Where does the python2_7 come from?  The ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:03 PM n952162 wrote: > > On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. > > > > > > Okay, is the solution then to re-install? > Personally I wouldn't start with a reinstall. I'd start with my world file and

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 1:09 AM, Dan Egli wrote: Have to agree with Neil on this one. You've got a LOT of updates. World is great, but start with emerge -UDuv @system, after you find the culprit that is still setting python3_6 as a target. Once the system emerge is done then you can try world again and

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. Okay, is the solution then to re-install?

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

(sorry Neil, that you got directly addressed again, wasn' intentional, don't know how it happened)

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 08:14:04 +0100, n952162 wrote: ... There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated for quite some time. The (compressed) log of  a system and world update from 20. October (2020!) is attached. Nearly 2

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sunday, 13 December 2020 08:57:53 GMT n952162 wrote: > On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated > > > >>> for quite some time. > >> > >> The (compressed) log of a system and world update from 20. October > >> (2020!)

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/13/20 9:18 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated for quite some time. The (compressed) log of  a system and world update from 20. October (2020!) is attached. Nearly 2 months, quite a long time in Gentoo update terms. !!! 

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 08:14:04 +0100, n952162 wrote: You sent this to me personally instead of the list. > > There's a lot to trawl through here, it looks like you haven't updated > > for quite some time. > > > The (compressed) log of  a system and world update from 20. October > (2020!) is

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

Have to agree with Neil on this one. You've got a LOT of updates. World is great, but start with emerge -UDuv @system, after you find the culprit that is still setting python3_6 as a target. Once the system emerge is done then you can try world again and hopefully get a much smaller list. We

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:08:15 +0100, n952162 wrote: > I did a --depclean but that didn't help.  I'm not seeing where an error > is indicated. > > This was done with this still installed: > >  */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7 > > I commented that out and tried again, and after a few USE flag >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 07:59:13 -0500, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:31, John Covici wrote: > > dev-python/paramiko:0 > > > > (dev-python/paramiko-2.7.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="-doc > > -examples (-server) -test" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 > > python3_7

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:31, John Covici wrote: > dev-python/paramiko:0 > > (dev-python/paramiko-2.7.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="-doc > -examples (-server) -test" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 > python3_7 -python3_6 -python3_8" pulled in by > >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:13:19 -0500, n952162 wrote: > > [1 ] > On 12/3/20 10:11 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:06 AM tastytea > > wrote: > > > > On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 > > wrote: > > > > > I'm trying

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:48:23 +0100, n952162 wrote: > "You need to check this list carefully. "  I haven't a clue what to > check for.  I didn't add any of those.  I presume that anything I > explicitly added would be in the world file. You check for packages that you want to use. Those should be

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:54:50 +0100, n952162 wrote: > > Yes you should, t keep your system consistent. You should also heed > > the messages about unread news items and updating config files as > > these can also have a bearing on keeping your system running > > smoothly. > > > I maintain at

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

Victor Ivanov wrote: > On 05/12/2020 10:13, Dale wrote: >> that as, I learned the hard way.  Once you get Gentoo installed and all >> the packages you want installed completed, it is wise to add the >> --oneshot option to the defaults in make.conf.  That helps keep the >> world file clean since

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 05/12/2020 10:13, Dale wrote: that as, I learned the hard way.  Once you get Gentoo installed and all the packages you want installed completed, it is wise to add the --oneshot option to the defaults in make.conf.  That helps keep the world file clean since you won't have packages in the

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/5/20 11:13 AM, Dale wrote: n952162 wrote: On 12/5/20 10:06 AM, n952162 wrote: I understand now that you've checked this list for me.  That is really helpful.  Thank you. (in that it shows me how to go about it). Advice from a long term user who didn't do this in the beginning. 

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

n952162 wrote: > On 12/5/20 10:06 AM, n952162 wrote: >> >> I understand now that you've checked this list for me.  That is really >> helpful.  Thank you. >> > (in that it shows me how to go about it). > > Advice from a long term user who didn't do this in the beginning.  Read that as, I learned

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/5/20 10:06 AM, n952162 wrote: I understand now that you've checked this list for me.  That is really helpful.  Thank you. (in that it shows me how to go about it).

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 11:40 PM, Jack wrote: >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:  sys-kernel/gentoo-sources     selected: 4.19.72    protected: none omitted: 5.4.72 It's going to remove an old version and leave a newer version.  If you really want the old one kept, you should

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 11:46 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 23:19:00 +0100, n952162 wrote: Okay, I've never done a depclean.  Is that something I need to do?  I mean, I'm always worried it'd remove something that I need, but given all the problems I have, I guess that'd be the lesser of

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 11:40 PM, Jack wrote: You seem to not really understand how gentoo works. Yes, that's absolutely true. Most of the time, yes, you do need to do a depclean.  It's pretty common to do it after every world update.  In general, it gets rid of things emerged as a dependency of

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 23:19:00 +0100, n952162 wrote: > > Okay, I've never done a depclean.  Is that something I need to do?  I > > mean, I'm always worried it'd remove something that I need, but given > > all the problems I have, I guess that'd be the lesser of evils... Yes you should, t keep your

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

You seem to not really understand how gentoo works. On 2020.12.04 17:19, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 11:13 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote: I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones I need. 

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 11:13 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote: I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones I need.  I'll try that.  But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=', promising me troubles earlier?

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote: I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=', promising me troubles earlier? The earlier you encounter any

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote: > > I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones > > I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=', > > promising me troubles earlier? The earlier you encounter any conflicts, they're generally easier to

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 9:00 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 8:52 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote: Forgotten about?  I'm flattered!  That would imply I understood something here ... Here's my python situation: $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d'

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 8:52 PM, n952162 wrote: On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote: Forgotten about?  I'm flattered!  That would imply I understood something here ... Here's my python situation: $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u */*

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote: Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood something here ... Here's my python situation: $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

> There seems to be some python3_6 and even python2_7 in your error > output, maybe you have set some older python targets somewhere that > you've forgotten about? > Yeah I was thinking the same. If 'grep -i python /etc/portage/*' is not empty, try making it that way. On my system with 1323

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote: > Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood > something here ... > > Here's my python situation: > > $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u > */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7 > >=dev-lang/python-2.7.16:2.7 sqlite >

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/4/20 9:53 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote: !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: dev-python/requests:0 (dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo,

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 04/12/2020 08:53, Arve Barsnes wrote: There seems to be some python3_6 and even python2_7 in your error output, maybe you have set some older python targets somewhere that you've forgotten about? Or maybe he hasn't set any and the defaults are wrong? I'm guessing that's the case with me.

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote: > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > dev-python/requests:0 > >(dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for > merge)

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/3/20 10:06 PM, tastytea wrote: On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 wrote: I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages support it yet. You can

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 12/3/20 10:11 PM, Adam Carter wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:06 AM tastytea mailto:gen...@tastytea.de>> wrote: On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote: > I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks > ago, but it seems not to work. 

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:06:45 +0100, tastytea wrote: > > I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks > > ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? > > Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages support it > yet. You can put > */*

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 03/12/2020 21:06, tastytea wrote: Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages support it yet. You can put */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7 into /etc/portage/package.use as a workaround. Don't forget to remove it in a month or so. I'm on the same boat. It's indeed because of

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:06 AM tastytea wrote: > On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 wrote: > > > I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks > > ago, but it seems not to work. Can somebody explain to me why? > > Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 wrote: > I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks > ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages support it yet. You can put */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 20:48 +, antlists wrote: > I've got a similar problem - an "emerge --sync" said "portage has been > updated, you really should emerge it first before doing anything else". > So I tried. > > And it blew up very similarly to you, with loads of python problems Same boat

Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

On 03/12/2020 20:33, n952162 wrote: I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? I've got a similar problem - an "emerge --sync" said "portage has been updated, you really should emerge it first before doing

[gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why

I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks ago, but it seems not to work.  Can somebody explain to me why? These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies  * IMPORTANT: 9 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.  * Use eselect news